ISO 14001 Quality Manual

Integrate ISO 14001 with Existing procedures

2011-06-03T05:38:00.001-07:00

Much of what an organization must do in an ISO 14001 EMS is probably already being done. No organization can operate without some environmental programs in place. These programs may need modification to comply with the ISO 14001 standard, but they serve as a good starting point to begin construction of an ISO compliant EMS. In fact, a good way to look at your EMS Manual is to view it as a road map. It will tell people where to find programs the organization uses to handle environmental concerns such as: wastewater systems operational manuals, air permit operating requirements, hazardous wastes handling procedures, materials purchasing requirements, and so forth.

A well-conceived ISO 14001 EMS will use existing environmental programs and procedures as a foundation. It will also include the business management practices of the company wherever possible. An example of this would be tying environmental impacts of raw materials purchases into an existing procedure to review raw materials specifications for engineering requirements and consistency. Many firms already have such procedures in place.

Other types of program integration may include integrating cost accounting practices with environmental operational practices. Many organizations cannot actually determine where their environmental dollars go. As a result, they cannot identify opportunities for financial improvement in environmental practices. Without such information, the environmental management of an organization is difficult. If management cannot see any cost benefit in environmental decision making, the managers usually take the least costly option. Activitybased costing allows a more comprehensive understanding of how environmental expenses are accrued by process and product rather than by facility or region. Then process control and product design can be reviewed to see if costs associated with their environmental impacts can be minimized. This is a good example of what ISO 14001 hopes to accomplish–good financial management leading to better environmental control.

Initial Review Of Gap Analysis In ISO 14001

2011-06-03T05:37:00.001-07:00

A fundamental concept of the ISO 14001 EMS Standard is continual improvement of environmental performance. Before you can plan for improvement, you must first determine the current state of the organization’s environmental programs.

The initial review or gap analysis is, in itself, a microcosm of a well-organized approach to the entire ISO 14001 EMS development process. Each specification of the standard must be reviewed, including policy, legal requirements, training, objectives and targets, operational control systems, document control, auditing, management review, and corrective action.

The review should take into account the culture, products, marketing strategies, and other specifics of the organization. In all cases, consideration should be given to the full range of operating conditions, including possible incidents and emergency situations that may be encountered.

The ability of suppliers and subcontractors to comply with the Organization’s EMS program and applicable regulatory requirements should also be evaluated. It is strongly recommended that the initial review consider energy use, financial accounting, and information systems so that these issues may be integrated into the EMS program.

To effectively begin the Initial Review, several things must happen. First, Management should issue a company-wide announcement of intent and endorsement. This should include estimates of the time required to complete the Initial Review, and time required to complete the entire project. Second, the project leader should be identified and vested with ample authority for completion of the project.

The Initial Review is a review of all pertinent documents, from which an accurate plan is designed for the EMS Gap Analysis.

All information from the review, including deviation from regulatory requirements and adverse impacts on the environment, should be identified along with policies, programs, procedures, training and work instructions, and operational controls.

A portion of the project team should begin to assemble a registry of appropriate regulations identified during the Initial Review. All pertinent national, state, local and self-subscribed requirements should be assembled. They should be compared with identified environmental impacts.

An Initial Review is also important in ensuring that EMS design is compatible with all current organizational management structures and operations wherever possible. This is especially important where the EMS interfaces with the site’s existing health and safety, accounting, computer systems, purchasing, energy utilization and other management programs. The focus will be to achieve operational efficiencies that ensure environmental improvements and maximize cost reductions.

Initial Review outputs will be:

· An EMS Gap Analysis Design that details where existing environmental management procedures must be further investigated to determine conformance with the Standard.

· A review of the site’s overall environmental management strengths/weaknesses.

· A schedule of events for the Gap Analysis.

The gap analysis allows for a quick but comprehensive assessment of the facility’s existing environmental management practices and procedures, and compares them

with the requirements of the Standard. To perform the Gap Analysis, a standard template tailored for that specific purpose is used. The template is a questionnaire with a three way scoring system, which develops a final rating of the current programs of the site as they compare with the sections of the Standard. The score from this questionnaire and investigative template identifies which areas of the EMS might be enhanced to improve environmental performance and comply with the Standard.

Based on the results of the Gap Analysis, the project schedule and design may require modifications. Modification should precede further systems development. Using the results of the Gap Analysis, the EMS developmental process can now begin.

This may involve modifying existing procedures, adapting other business procedures such as those designed for health and safety, accounting, or risk management to environmental utilization. At certain points, new procedures will be required.

Prior to embarking on EMS development, always remember that the more flexible your EMS is, the easier it will be to implement and the more flexible it will be in the future.

EMS AUDITING CONCEPTS AND ISO 14000

2011-06-03T05:36:00.001-07:00

The Environmental Management System (EMS) audit is based on the generic concept of auditing. Simply put, an audit, any audit, is the comparison of actual conditions to expected conditions, and a determination as to whether one is in conformance or not in conformance. This is the same philosophy used to perform financial, quality, regulatory compliance, and systems audits. It is prudent to first review what the common elements are in order to better understand why audits are different.

There are several definitions of audit components that are common to any type of audit. ISO 14001 defines these terms for EMS audits, but they apply in other cases also. As a matter of fact, the ISO committee decided not to create auditing standards for other types of audits, such as compliance audits, although it was originally considered. The main reason for deleting the work items was because the concepts and processes defined in 14011, originally intended for EMS audits, were generic enough to be applied “as is” to other types of audits.

An audit is fundamentally a comparison of audit evidence to audit criteria to determine findings. The evidence is the objective information collected through interviews, visual reconnaissance, and documentation review. The audit criteria are the expectations or “rules” of how conditions should be. It is the criteria that distinguish one audit from the next. For example, in compliance auditing, the criteria are the regulations. With an EMS audit, the criteria would be the description of the expected system elements. In this case, the EMS criteria would be that described in ISO 14001, the specification standard.

When evidence is compared to criteria, one can determine whether the audited entity does or does not conform. This determination is a finding, and a finding can either be one of conformance, or non-conformance. Therefore, an audit will always produce findings, even if what is being audited is in full conformance with criteria.

Other key definitions to be aware of with auditing are: objectives, scope, auditee, client, and auditor. The audit objective(s) is simply why you are conducting an audit; usually the reason is to demonstrate conformance to stated criteria. The audit scope is what entity is being audited, and can be a company, a site, or unit within a site or company.

In the ISO 14000 realm, there is a clear distinction between the auditee and client. The auditee is the entity being audited. The client is the party commissioning the audit. For example, a client can be the customer, and the auditee a supplier to that customer. In ISO 14000, this distinction is important because the client sets the scope, objectives, and plan for an audit, not the auditee, although it is expected the auditee will be involved and cooperate.

The auditor is the one actually collecting evidence and determining findings. The auditor can be comprised of several individuals on a team. There are requirements in ISO 14001 that state that those performing functions within the EMS, such as the auditors, be qualified in their tasks. This means the auditors must have received training in EMS auditing. However, there may be audit team members who do not have the training, but are on the team because of some unique expertise, such as process, language, or regulatory knowledge.

The Difference Between Compliance Auditing and Systems Auditing In ISO 14001

2011-06-03T05:35:00.000-07:00

Often however, there is confusion between regulatory compliance auditing and EMS auditing. This is because there are many elements of regulatory compliance that overlap with the EMS. Recall that the criteria in a compliance audit are the applicable regulations, whereas the criteria in an EMS audit would be ISO 14001. But does not ISO 14001 address compliance? The answer is yes, but from a system standpoint, not performance.

In other words, the standard requires that certain procedures exist regarding identification of legal and other requirements, that periodic compliance assessments be performed, that legal requirements be considered in setting objectives and targets, and that there be a commitment to compliance. However, actually being in compliance is a performance issue, and out of the purview of ISO 14001.

Of course, a system that is constantly out of compliance or does not identify and initiate action to correct noncompliances, will eventually fail due to system failure. The subtle, yet important point is that during an EMS audit, identified regulatory noncompliances are relevant only to the extent that they reflect a potential system problem. The finding therefore is not that the site is out of compliance with a given regulation, but that the noncompliance means some EMS element is not conformed to. For example, a regulatory noncompliance can be related to a problem with training, recordkeeping, or monitoring and measurement.

The EMS auditor is not to do a compliance audit as part of the EMS audit. If, as part of the statistical sampling to verify EMS element requirements, the auditor identifies a regulatory noncompliance, he or she treats it as any other evidence.

This point has been difficult to accept, especially in U.S. industry because of our long history of regulatory enforcement. The EMS auditor needs to constantly remember that compliance auditing is being done separately as part of the EMS requirements itself (4.5.1, paragraph 3) and to stay focused on the criteria at hand – ISO 14001 and the site’s EMS. There may be legal requirements regarding noncompliances encountered during the EMS audit, but this should be decided and addressed in the audit plan.

In summary, the goal of the compliance audit is to verify compliance with regulations, whereas the EMS audit’s goal is to verify that the EMS conforms to planned arrangements, including ISO 14001.

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

2010-06-29T06:27:00.000-07:00

ISO 14001 Standard & Environmental Issues

ISO 14001 is a systematic tool that enables an organization in any market sector to focus on their situation, identify the relevant environmental issues and to lessen their impact to their benefit and the environment. It is part of a global response to the recognition that we are damaging the environment in which we all live. The cause and effect of the foremost world environmental issues, which are all due to mankind, are generally too vast and too intangible for us to grasp and so the slightly cliché expression ‘think global, act local’ is very relevant. Once the EMS is implemented and to become registered to ISO 14001, the external auditor will assess your EMS in two separate stages, on site. The first stage to understand your business activities and determine formal readiness for assessment and the second to check practical compliance with ISO 14001. After registration he will return at regular intervals every year to verify continual improvement and regulatory compliance, against your set objectives and your EMS. The external auditor should be seen as a wise friend, not a policeman. He should certainly explain his findings and assist the company to find ISO 14001 registration is not a cure for all environmental problems but I hope I’ve demonstrated that it is a worthwhile, if not essential business initiative that could enable your management to better manage your business, gain commercial advantage and minimize its environmental impact.

Environmental Policy In iSO 14001 Standard

2010-05-22T15:47:00.000-07:00

Environmental Policy In ISO 14001 Standard

The company or organisation must write an environmental policy

statement which is relevant to the business activities and approved by

top management. Their full commitment is essential if environmental

management is to work. The ISO 14001 Standard clearly sets out

what to cover in the policy. Often a one page document is sufficient.

Produce a first issue and expect to amend it several times before

assessment and registration as knowledge grows in the company.

Changes to ISO 9000

2009-09-30T06:51:00.002-07:00

Changes in titles
The titles have changed – moving away from models to requirements andguidance.

Changes in scope
The scope of the standard has changed from those activities that impact theproduct to embrace all activities
in an organization that serve the satisfaction of customers. This leaves little if any activity of an organization that would be
outside the scope of the quality management system.

Changes in structure

By far the most significant change is the change in structure – away from 20elements to a model based on five elements.
The ISO 9000:2000 family of standard is based on a process model.
Changes in content
The content has changed from 20 elements organized on the basis of whatcould go wrong to four groups of requirements
that focus on elements of process management. It is however, not the fact that the original elements have
been placed onto a new structure, but that the principles upon which the standard has been based have changed.
Changes in intent
The intent of ISO 9001 has changed from a model for quality assurance to a setof requirements for an effective quality
management. The standard is now based on eight management principles not on what requirements were
necessary to prevent failures that experience had shown led to poor product quality.
The forgotten standard ISO 8402 is brought into the family of ISO 9000 thus making it more likely that people will use it.
However, in the author ’s opinion, all three standards should have been merged into one standard thus
ensuring that everyone who possessed the requirements also possessed the concepts, terminology and
guidelines to refer to as necessary.
Much damage can be done when the requirements of ISO 9000 are taken out
of context, taken in isolation and taken literally. ISO 9000 is not a productstandard therefore it is subject to
interpretation as appropriate to the conditions
in which it is being used. Whatever the initial understanding of a requirement
of ISO 9001 might be, the intent is that:
organizations design and manage their processes effectively to achievecorporate objectives, not that they create functional
silos that compete for resources.
organizations choose the right things to do based on an objective analysis of
the environment in which they operate, not slavishly follow procedures that
serve no practical purpose.
management create an environment in which people will be motivated, not
create bureaucratic systems of documentation that stifle initiative and
creativity.
Changes in language
The language in ISO 9000 has changed to reflect pressure from the usercommunity for a user-friendlier standard.
In some cases the changes are insignificant but in others the changes have a wider impact as indicated
below:
Subcontractor has changed to supplier and supplier changed to organizationso that there is now a supply
chain represented by customer – organization – supplier.
In ISO 9001 the term customer is used but in ISO 9004 the term, interested party
is used in order to embrace customers, employees, investors and otherparties.
Executive management has been changed to Top Management indicating thatwhen the standard uses
the term management responsibility it is the people who direct the organization that should address
these requirements.
Specified requirements have changed to customer and regulatory require-ments or product requirements
depending on the context.
Procedures have not exactly been changed to processes but presented in adifferent way that makes
procedures only one element of managing an effective process. Procedures have lost their dominance in
the standard to be replaced by the concept of managed processes.
Changes in requirement
ISO 9001 still contains 136 ‘shall’ statements, 2 less than the 1994 version so insome respects it is no different.
There were roughly 323 requirements in ISO 9001:1994 (Hoyle, David, 1996)6 . In ISO 9001:2000 there are roughly 250
requirements. This is still too many especially if we are trying to get across the
fundamental requirements of the standard. The following summarizes the
requirement of ISO 9001 at two levels: firstly as a single requirement, secondly
as a series of generic requirements.

Environmental Aspects (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.3.1)

2009-09-30T06:51:00.001-07:00

The requirement of ?4.3.1 of ISO 14001 is to establish and maintain procedures 1) for identifying the environmental aspects of the organization’s activities, products, and services that it can control and those that it can influence and 2) for determining which of those aspects have or can have a significant impact on the environment. Understanding the requirement of this element of ISO 14001 is central to understanding the concept of an environmental management system.
1 .A single manufacturing facility has potentially hundreds of environmental aspects. How far must it go in identifying its environmental aspects to satisfy the terms of the requirement? ISO 14001 specifies that the organization is to identify those aspects that it can control and those that it can influence and that it must also take into account planned or new developments and new or modified activities, products, and services. These stipulations in the requirements, without actually drawing boundaries on how far the organization must go in identifying environmental aspects, at least establish some categories of aspect that must be considered. Beyond this principle, each organization must identify its aspects comprehensively enough so as to not fail to identify a significant aspect or a legal requirement. An objection to comprehensive identification of aspects is that the organization may become so immersed in aspects identification that it loses sight of the end objective of the procedure, which is to determine significance.
2. Significant impact is not a stand-alone term in ?4.3.1.
It is accompanied by the phrase impact on the environment_ and environment_ is a defined term (see definition of environment, ?3.5). Significant aspects, then, are those environmental aspects that have or can have significant impacts on air, water, land, natural resources, flora, fauna, and humans. The organization determines, using its own criteria, what magnitude of impact on these seven environmental receptors constitutes a significant impact. Whether an aspect is regulated is not intended to be a factor in determining significance.
3. Proper execution of the environmental aspects procedure is important, in part, because it lifts environmental management out of the regulatory compliance mode and into the mode of systematically identifying environmental aspects and impacts and considering their consequences for the environment, irrespective of regulation. The organization that rigorously applies the environmental aspects procedure discovers many opportunities to improve environmental performance that regulation does not address, including:
• Use of energy
• Consumption of materials
• Environmental impacts of employee activities
•Environmental impacts of products and by-products post-manufacture, including distribution, use, reuse, and disposal
• Environmental impacts of services
• Unregulated waste streams such as carbon dioxide
Aspects vs. Impacts – Environmental aspects and environmental impacts differ by definition from one another in that an aspect is an element of an organization’s activities, products or services that can interact (emphasis added) with the environment_ while an impact is any change (emphasis added) to the environment_ resulting from an organization’s environmental aspects._ An aspect, then, is a precursor to an impact and an impact occurs when the aspect interacts with and changes the environment.
When identifying its aspects and impacts, the organization may find that there are more than one potential impacts associated with any given aspect. For example, an environmental aspect of a coal-fired power generation facility is stack emissions containing sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon. These emissions change the environment and become impacts by contaminating plants, soil, and surface waters; contributing to the formation of ground-level ozone; causing or exacerbating heart and lung disease in humans; entering the aquatic food chain and impairing reproductive, immune, and endocrine systems; and contributing to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide leading to global warming. One aspect, stack emissions, then can generate at least five impacts.
Other organizations, applying benefit/cost analyses to their corrective actions, may discover that creation of a beneficial impact provides a greater environmental benefit than elimination of an adverse impact.
The introduction of the beneficial environmental impact concept into the ISO 14001 Terms and Definitions suggests that it was considered by some of the ISO 14001:1996 drafters as a placeholder for the future possibility of offsetting adverse impacts with beneficial and, on balance, achieving an environmentally neutral organization.
Control and Influence – The environmental aspects procedure requires the organization to identify those environmental aspects that it can control and those that it can influence._ Circumstances where control and influence are considered separately can occur where the environmental aspects of products or services are concerned. Some examples illustrate the case:
1. No control, no influence – When an organization manufactures a product, such as lumber, and sells it to a customer that can use the product in any way that it wishes, the organization has no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The customer could use the product benignly as in the manufacture of a table or to damage the environment by burning the lumber and releasing its carbon into the atmosphere. In this case, the organization would not be expected to have either control or influence over the environmental aspects of the product.
2. Control, no influence – When an organization’s environmental aspect is the use of electric power generated from coal, it may be able to control its use of electric power by using less, by buying from a different, less environmentally damaging source, or by generating its own power. Rarely, however, does the organization have influence over the power generator to an extent that it could influence it to reduce the environmental impacts of power production.
3. Influence, no control – When an organization manufactures a product, such as an automobile, which is sold to the customer without restrictions on its use, the organization may be said to have no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The organization may, however, be able to assert influence with the inclusion of owner’s manuals containing instructions for low impact use of the product.
4. Control and influence – When an organization buys a product built to its specifications, it has control over the products’ environmental aspects in the sense that it can determine the environmental aspects of the product. In this case, control also includes influence.
Significant Impacts – ISO 14001 does not provide guidance as to what constitutes a significant impact on the environment_, leaving that determination to the organization.
Many organizations ignore the qualifying phrase, impact on the environment_, and add additional criteria to what they determine to be significant impacts. For example, many organizations decide that aspects that are the subject of regulation, irrespective of impact to the environment, or that can cause damage to business reputation, are significant. Legal requirements, however, are identified in ?4.3.2 and legal requirements and business requirements are specifically considered when the organization establishes its objectives and targets (?4.3.3). Adding criteria that are not relevant to impact on the environment in the determination of significance distorts the outcome of procedures for environmental aspects and objectives and targets by giving these criteria undue weight in the determination of significance. For example, an environmental aspect that is significant only because its disclosure might affect the organization’s reputation is best dealt with in the Public Relations Department rather than as an environmental aspect.
Determination of significance is a yes or no question, not a determination of relative value. It is possible, therefore, that the execution of the environmental aspects procedure will result in the determination that the organization has no significant aspects. While the organization may elect to rank its aspects from most significant to least significant, that does not necessarily mean that any rise to the level of significant impact on the environment.
Where the impact occurs can be material to determination of significance. For example, a coal-fired power plant’s air emissions can interact with the environment; these emissions are clearly environmental aspects. Whether they significantly impact the environment may depend upon where the interaction with the environment occurs.
Part of the importance of establishing significance lies in the fact that the potentially significant environmental impacts become a focus of Objectives and Targets (?4.3.3), Competence (?4.4.2), Operational Controls (?4.4.6), and Monitoring and Measurement (?4.5.1) requirements.
An organization that determines that aspects are significant because of regulation or business reputation increases the amount of work it must do in these areas.
ISO 14001 does not require the organization to establish objectives and targets for each significant environmental aspect. On the one hand, the absence of a requirement to set objectives and targets for all significant aspects gives organizations latitude to conform to the requirements of ISO 14001 while not presently dealing, for example, with the significant environmental aspects of products. On the other, a requirement to establish objectives and targets for all identified significant aspects could easily overwhelm an organization having many significant aspects. Without this latitude, organizations might choose to ignore the existence of significant aspects that they believe are insurmountable or even decide not to implement ISO 14001. As it is, many organizations choose to deny the existence of significant aspects about which they feel they can do nothing.

Key Elements of ISO 14001

2009-09-30T06:50:00.002-07:00

The Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority; Legal and Other Requirements; Evaluation of Compliance; and Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Preventive Action elements of ISO 14001 are all essential to the ongoing effectiveness of the EMS. This section describes how they function within the overall scheme.
1. Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.4.1)
?4.4.1 of ISO 14001 establishes three important requirements:
1. That management ensure the availability of resources to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the EMS;
2. That roles, responsibilities, and authorities be defined, documented, and communicated in order to facilitate effective environmental management; and
3. That top management appoint a management representative(s) who, irrespective of other responsibilities, will have responsibility and authority for implementing and maintaining the EMS and for reporting to top management on the performance of the EMS.
Ensuring Availability of Resources – Provision of resources for the EMS is almost always an issue within organizations. Although top management usually understands and accepts, at least in principle, the requirement to provide resources, the level of management that makes decisions on capital deployment and operating budgets often does not subscribe to the same requirement. Making the case for resources typically requires the implementation team or management representative to quantify intangibles such as the avoided cost of regulatory fines or the value to the environment of reducing environmental impacts.
When considering the requirement to provide resources, especially financial resources, it may be important to recognize that ISO 14001 requires the provision of resources for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS, not necessarily resources to correct or prevent environmental impacts or to register to ISO 14001. When contemplating the cost of implementing ISO 14001, organizations, again, should think in terms of three separate cost categories:
1) Internal labor and external consultant costs to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the policy and procedural elements of ISO 14001;
2) Capital costs for correction or prevention of environmental impacts; and
3) Costs of registration to ISO 14001, if the organization elects to register.
Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities – In the past, some organizations have employed a practice of not delegating responsibility and authority for environmental affairs to specific management representatives, reasoning that if the responsibility was diffused throughout the organization, no one person could become personally accountable for non-compliance with regulations or for environmental liabilities. §4.4.1 of ISO 14001 limits such ‘willful ignorance’ by requiring top management of the organization to appoint “specific management representative(s)” to ensure that the EMS is implemented and that top management be apprised of EMS performance. It also requires that the delegation of responsibility and authority be documented and communicated, thus eliminating circumstances where responsibility and authority for the EMS are diffuse or uncertain.
When §4.4.1 is read together with the requirement of the Environmental Policy for a commitment to comply with applicable legal requirements, §4.3.2, Legal and Other
Requirements, requiring a procedure for identifying legal requirements (following), and §4.5.2, Evaluation of Compliance, requiring a procedure for evaluating regulatory compliance, it is evident that the management representative is also responsible for ensuring that the organization is in compliance with applicable regulations. While this responsibility and authority can be delegated, the chain of delegation begins with top management and is passed to the management representative, effectively eliminating any uncertainty as to who is responsible and authorized to ensure regulatory compliance.
EMS Organizational Structure – There is an almost universal norm for the management structure of the EMS organization under ISO 14001. It begins with the top management position, proceeds to the top manager’s leadership team, and then to an EMS implementation team that is generally chaired by the management representative. The departments making up the relevant functions and levels of the organization and environmental, safety, and health professionals comprise the typical implementation team.
Defining Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities for the EMS – In defining, documenting, and communicating EMS roles, responsibilities, and authorities, it makes sense to begin with top management and proceed through all of the positions having EMS responsibilities. Following is a generic example of how roles, responsibilities, and authorities might be documented and communicated in an EMS Procedures Manual:
Plant Manager
Authority: The Plant Manager has the authority, responsibility, and accountability for managing all aspects of ABC Company’s activities, products, and services at the Anytown facility.Source: Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, ABC Company, Inc.
EMS Responsibilities: Under the requirements of ISO 14001, the Plant Manager shall be specifically responsible for:
1) Defining the Environmental Policy;
2) Delegating authority and responsibility for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS;
3) Providing human, technological, infrastructure, and financial resources and specialized skills; and
4) Periodically reviewing the EMS for suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness and directing changes as necessary to achieve the goals for an EMS and the commitment to continual improvement.
Leadership Team
EMS Responsibilities: The Leadership Team shall advise the Plant Manager on the exercise by
the Plant Manager of his/her responsibilities for the EMS.
Management Representative, Implementation and Maintenance Responsibilities
EMS Authority: The Plant Manager delegates to the Manager, ______ _______, the authority
to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the Environmental Management System and to
ensure that it conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. In the context of ISO 14001, the
Manager, _____ _________, shall be the Management Representative.

Environmental Management Programmes

2009-09-30T06:50:00.001-07:00

ISO 14001 Section 4.3.4, Environmental Management Program(s), requires that organizations establish and maintain one or more environmental management programs for achieving their objectives. The environmental management program is a key element to the success of an EMS. Properly designed and implemented, environmental management programs should achieve the objectives and, consequently, improve your organization’s environmental performance.
According to ISO 14001 Section 4.3.4 the environmental management program must:
1. address each environmental objective and target
2. designate the personnel responsible for achieving targets at each relevant function and level of the
organization
3. provide an “action plan” describing how each environmental target will be achieved
4. establish a time-frame or a schedule for achieving each target.
An environmental management program is an action plan or a series of action plans to achieve an environmental objective.

EMS Documentation

2009-09-30T06:49:00.000-07:00

ISO 14001 Section 4.4.4, EMS Documentation, requires that organizations “. . . establish and maintain information, in paper or electronic form, to: 1. describe the core elements of the management system and their interaction; 2. provide direction to related documentation.”
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.5, Document Control, requires that organizations establish and maintain procedures to control all documents required by ISO 14001. The purpose of these document control procedures is to ensure that organizations create and maintain documents sufficient to implementing an EMS.
The procedure must ensure that:
• EMS documents can be located
• EMS documents are legible, dated (with dates of revisions) and readily identifiable
• EMS documents are maintained in an orderly manner and retained for a specified period
• EMS documents are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary, and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel
• The current versions of relevant documents are available at all locations where they are necessary
• Obsolete documents are promptly removed from all distribution points
• Any obsolete documents retained for legal and/or knowledge preservation purposes must be identified as such.
ISO 14001 Section 4.3.5 also requires that organizations establish procedures and designate responsibilities and
authority regarding the creation and modification of EMS documents.

Implementing ISO 9000 Quality Management System

2009-09-30T06:48:00.002-07:00

Implementation of ISO 9000 affects the entire organization right from the start. If pursued with total dedication, it results in ‘cultural transition’ to an atmosphere of continuous improvement.The process of implementing ISO 9000 depends on:???? The sophistication of your existing quality program,???? The size of your organization, and???? The complexity of your process.The 14 essential steps, briefly described below, are to be followed through in order to implement ISO 9000 quality management system successfully.Step 1: Top management commitmentStep 2: Establish implementation teamStep 3. Start ISO 9000 awareness programsStep 4: Provide TrainingStep 5. Conduct initial status surveyStep 6: Create a documented implementation planStep 7. Develop quality management system documentationStep 8: Document controlStep 9. ImplementationStep 10. Internal quality auditStep 11. Management reviewStep 12. Pre-assessment auditStep 13. Certification and registrationStep 14: Continual ImprovementStep 1: Top Management CommitmentThe top management (managing director or chief executive) should demonstrate a commitment and a determination to implement an ISO 9000 quality management system in the organization. Without top management commitment, no quality initiative can succeed. Top management must be convinced that registration and certification will enable the organization to demonstrate to its customers a visible commitment to quality. It should realize that a quality management system would improve overallbusiness efficiency by elimination of wasteful duplication in management system.The top management should provide evidence of its commitment to the development and implementation of the quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness by:a. Communicating to the organization the importance of meeting customer as well as statutory and regulatory requirements,b. Defining the organization’s quality policy and make this known to every employee,c. Ensuring that quality objectives are established at all levels and functions,d. Ensuring the availability of resources required for the development andimplementation of the quality management system,e. Appointing a management representative to coordinate quality management system activities, and Conducting management review.The top management should also consider actions such as:1. Leading the organization by example,2. Participating in improvement projects,3. Creating an environment that encourages the involvement of people.This type of top management commitment may be driven by:1. Direct marketplace pressure: requirements of crucial customers or parentconglomerates.2. Indirect marketplace pressure: increased quality levels and visibility among competitors.3. Growth ambitions: desire to exploit market opportunities.4. Personal belief in the value of quality as a goal and quality management systems as a means of reaching that goal.The top management should identify the goals to be achieved through the quality management system. Typical goals may be:• Be more efficient and profitable• Produce products and services that consistently meet customers’ needs andexpectations• Achieve customers satisfaction• Increase market share• Improve communications and morale in the organization• Reduce costs and liabilities• Increase confidence in the production systemStep 2. Establish Implementation TeamISO 9000 is implemented by people. The first phase of implementation calls for the commitment of top management – the CEO and perhaps a handful of other key people.The next step is to establish implementation team and appoint a ManagementRepresentative (MR) as its coordinator to plan and oversee implementation. Its members should include representatives of all functions of the organization -Marketing, Design and development, Planning, Production, Quality control, etc.In the context of the standard, the MR is the person within the Organization who acts as interface between organization management and the ISO 9000 registrar. His role is, in fact, much broader than that. The MR should also act as the organization’s “quality management system champion,” and must be a person with:
1. Total backing from the CEO,2. Genuine and passionate commitment to quality in general and the ISO 9000 qualitymanagement system in particular,3. The dignity – resulting from rank, seniority, or both – to influence managers and others of all levels and functions,4. Detailed knowledge of quality methods in general and ISO 9000 in particular.The members of the implementation team should also be trained on ISO 9000 quality management systems by a professional training organization.
Step 3. Start ISO 9000 Awareness ProgramsISO 9000 awareness programs should be conducted to communicate to theemployees the aim of the ISO 9000 quality management system; the advantage it offers to employees, customers and the organization; how it will work; and their roles and responsibilities within the system. Suppliers of materials and components should also participate in these programs.The awareness program should emphasize the benefits that the organization expects to realize through its ISO 9000 quality management system. The program should also stress the higher levels of participation and self-direction that the quality management system renders to employees. Such a focus will go far to enlist employee support and commitment.The programs could be run either by the implementation team or by experts hired to talk to different levels of employees.Step 4. Provide TrainingSince the ISO 9000 quality management system affects all the areas and all personnel in the organization, training programs should be structured for different categories of employees – senior managers, middle-level managers, supervisors and workers. The ISO 9000 implementation plan should make provision for this training. The training should cover the basic concepts of quality management systems and the standard and their overall impact on the strategic goals of the organization, the changed processes, and the likely work culture implications of the system. In addition, initial training mayalso be necessary on writing quality manuals, procedures and work instruction; auditing principles; techniques of laboratory management; calibration; testing procedures, etc.When in-house capacity to carry out such training is not available, it may be necessary to participate in external training courses run by professional training organizations.Alternatively, an external training institution could be invited to conduct in-house training courses.
Step 5. Conduct Initial Status SurveyISO 9000 does not require duplication of effort or redundant system. The goal of ISO 9000 is to create a quality management system that conforms to the standard. This does not preclude incorporating, adapting, and adding onto quality programs already in place. So the next step in the implementation process is to compare the organization’s existing quality management system, if there is one — with the requirements of thestandard (ISO 9001:2008).For this purpose, an organization flow chart showing how information actually flows (not what should be done) from order placement by the customer to delivery to this customer should be drawn up. From this over-all flow chart, a flow chart of activities in each department should be prepared.With the aid of the flow charts, a record of existing quality management system should be established. A significant number of written procedures may already be in place.Unless they are very much out of date, these documents should not be discarded.Rather, they should be incorporated into the new quality management system.Documents requiring modification or elaboration should be identified and listed. Thisexercise is some times referred to as ” gap analysis”. During these review processes,wide consultation with executives and representatives of various unions andassociations within the organization is required to enlist their active cooperation.In the review process, documents should be collected, studied and registered for further use, possibly after they have been revised. Before developing new quality management system documentation, you need to consider with which quality requirements or department you should start. The best is to select an area where processes are fairly well organized, running effectively and functioning satisfactorily.The basic approach is to determine and record how a process is currently carried out.We can do this by identifying the people involved and obtaining information from them during individual interviews. Unfortunately, it often happens that different people will give different, contradicting versions of a process. Each one may refer to oral instructions that are not accurate or clear. This is why the facts are often not described correctly the first time around, and have to be revised several times.Once it has been agreed how to describe the current process, this process has to be adapted, supplemented and implemented according to the requirements of the quality standard (ISO 9001:2008). This requires organizational arrangements, the drawing up of additional documents and possible removal of existing documentation (e.g. procedures, inspection/test plans, inspection/test instructions) and records (e.g.inspection/test reports, inspection/test certificates).In introducing a quality management system, the emphasis is on the improvement of the existing processes or the re-organization of processes.In general, the steps to follow are the following:Ascertain and establish the following:What is the present operation/process? What already exists?
Analyze the relevant sections of the quality standard – ISO 9001:2000:What is actually required? If necessary, supplement and change operational arrangements in accordance with the standard, develop documents and records, and describe operations/processes:What is the desired operation/process?Figure 1: Steps in introducing a quality management systemThe above gap analysis can be done internally, if the knowledge level is there. Or aformal pre-assessment can be obtained from any one of a large number of ISO 9000consulting, implementing, and registration firms.Step 6. Create a Documented Implementation PlanOnce the organization has obtained a clear picture of how its quality management system compares with the ISO 9001:2008 standard, all non-conformances must be addressed with a documented implementation plan. Usually, the plan calls for identifying and describing processes to make the organization’s quality management system fully in compliance with the standard.The implementation plan should be thorough and specific, detailing:???? Quality documentation to be developed???? Objective of the system???? Pertinent ISO 9001:2008 section???? Person or team responsible???? Approval required???? Training required???? Resources required???? Estimated completion dateThese elements should be organized into a detailed chart, to be reviewed andapproved. The plan should define the responsibilities of different departments and personnel and set target dates for the completion of activities. Once approved, the Management Representative should control, review and update the plan as the implementation process proceeds.Typical implementation action plan is shown in Figure 2. Use ISO 10005:1995 for guidance in quality planning
Step 7. Develop Quality Management System DocumentationDocumentation is the most common area of non-conformance among organizations wishing to implement ISO 9000 quality management systems. As one company pointed out: “When we started our implementation, we found that documentation was inadequate. Even absent, in some areas. Take calibration. Obviously it’s necessary, and obviously we do it, but it wasn’t being documented. Another area was inspection and testing. We inspect and test practically every item that leaves here, but our documentation was inadequate”.Documentation of the quality management system should include:???? Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,???? A quality manual,???? Documented procedures and records required by the standard ISO 9001:2008, and???? Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.Quality documentation is generally prepared in the three levels indicated in the box that follows. Use ISO 10013:1995 for guidance in quality documentation.
In small companies, the above levels of documentation could be presented in one manual; otherwise, separate manuals should be prepared.A list of the documents to be prepared should be drawn up and the responsibility for writing the documents should be assigned to the persons concerned in various functional departments. They should be advised to prepare the drafts within a specific time frame.Step 8: Document ControlOnce the necessary quality management system documentation has been generated, a documented system must be created to control it. Control is simply a means of managing the creation, approval, distribution, revision, storage, and disposal of the various types of documentation. Document control systems should be as simple and as easy to operate as possible — sufficient to meet ISO 9001:2008 requirements and that is all.Document control should include:???? Approval for adequacy by authorized person (s) before issue,???? Review, updating and re-approval of documents by authorized person (s),???? Identification of changes and of the revision status of documents,???? Availability of relevant versions of documents at points of use,???? Identification and control of documents of external origin,???? Assurance of legibility and identifability of documents, and???? Prevention of unintended use of obsolete documents.The principle of ISO 9000 document control is that employees should have access to the documentation and records needed to fulfil their responsibilities.Step 9. ImplementationIt is good practice to implement the quality management system being documented as the documentation is developed, although this may be more effective in larger firms. In smaller companies, the quality management system is often implemented all at once throughout the organization. Where phased implementation takes place, the effectiveness of the system in selected areas can be evaluated.It would be a good idea initially to evaluate areas where the chances of a positive evaluation are high, to maintain the confidence of both management and staff in the merits of implementing the quality management system.The implementation progress should be monitored to ensure that the qualitymanagement system is effective and conforms to the standard. These activities include internal quality audit, formal corrective action and management review.Step 10. Internal Quality AuditAs the system is being installed, its effectiveness should be checked by regular internal quality audits. Internal quality audits are conducted to verify that the installed quality management system:
???? Conform to the planned arrangements, to the requirements of the standard (ISO 9001:2008) and to the quality management system requirements established by your organization, and???? Is effectively implemented and maintained.Even after the system stabilizes and starts functioning, internal audits should be planned and performed as part of an ongoing strategy.A few staff members should be trained to carry out internal auditing. Use ISO 19011 for guidance in auditing, auditor qualification and programmes.Step 11. Management ReviewWhen the installed quality management system has been operating for three to six months, an internal audit and management review should be conducted and corrective actions implemented. The management reviews are conducted to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system.????The review should include assessing opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system, including the quality policy and quality objectives.The input to management review should include information on:???? Results of audits,???? Customer feed back,???? Process performance and product conformity,???? Status of preventive and corrective actions,???? Follow-up actions from previous management reviews,???? Changes that could affect the quality management system, and???? Recommendations for improvements.Management reviews should also address the pitfalls to effective implementation, including lack of CEO commitment, failure to involve everyone in the process, and failure to monitor progress and enforce deadlines.Step 12. Pre-assessment AuditWhen system deficiencies are no longer visible, it is normally time to apply for certification. However, before doing so, a pre-assessment audit should be arranged with an independent and qualified auditor. Sometimes certification bodies provide this service for a nominal charge. The pre-assessment audit would provide a degree of confidence for formally going ahead with an application for certification.Step 13. Certification and RegistrationOnce the quality management system has been in operation for a few months and has stabilized, a formal application for certification could be made to a selected certification agency. The certification agency first carries out an audit of the documents (referred to as an “adequacy audit”). If the documents conform to the requirements of the quality standard, then on-site audit is carried out. If the certification body finds the system to be working satisfactorily, it awards the organization a certificate, generallyfor a period of three years. During this three-year period, it will carry out periodic surveillance audits to ensure that the system is continuing to operate satisfactorily.Step 14: Continual ImprovementCertification to ISO 9000 should not be an end. You should continually seek to improve the effectiveness and suitability of the quality management system through the use of:???? Quality policy???? Quality objectives???? Audit results???? Analysis of data???? Corrective and preventive actions???? Management reviewISO 9004:2008 provides a methodology for continual improvement.

ISO 14001 Auditing and Registration

2009-09-30T06:48:00.001-07:00

ISO 14001 Registration
A registration system has grown up around the implementation of the ISO 9000 quality management documents and has formed the basis for a similar system of registration to ISO 14001. At this writing, ISO 14001 is the only specification_ document of the ISO 14000 series and the only standard that is intended to be auditable; all of the other standards are, or will be, guidance documents.
Registrars – Globally, there are 40 – 50 or more organizations established to register organizations to ISO 14001. These registration organizations are accredited by the standards bodies in, for the most part, major industrial nations that have adopted ISO 14001 as their country’s EMS standard. In the U.S., for example, the body that accredits registrars is the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB). ANAB passes on the credentials of registrars to register organizations to ISO 14001.
ISO 14001 Audits
First-, second-, or third-party auditors can assess an organization’s conformity to the requirements of the standard. First-party Audits – In the first-party circumstance, the internal auditors of the implementing organization conduct an audit to determine that the EMS has been properly implemented and is being maintained. If the organization passes the internal audit, it may self declare_ its conformity to ISO 14001.
Second-party Audits – In the second-party circumstance, the audit is conducted by a representative of a party interested in the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The interested party_ may be a customer, an environmental regulator, an insurance company, or any other organization affected by the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The second-party audit can be a condition of doing business with the auditor’s organization.
Third-party Audits – In the third-party circumstance, an external EMS auditor conducts an audit, usually at the request of the implementing organization, to determine if the organization conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. The third-party audit is most often for the purpose of certifying_ that the organization is in conformity with the requirements of ISO 14001.
Typically, when a registration is awarded, it is for a period of three years with a provision for the periodic conduct of surveillance_ audits to ensure continuing conformity.
A principal benefit of the third-party audit is that it compels organizations to continually maintain the EMS in order to pass the follow-up surveillance audits; without this, there might be slippage in the maintenance of ISO 14001.
It is not a requirement of implementing ISO 14001 that organizations have a registration audit conducted; this is a decision made by each organization based upon its determination of the commercial value or necessity of certifying. When an ISO 14001 EMS is intended to be audited,
the requirements must be implemented and documented sufficiently for an auditor/registrar to be
able to conduct the audit based on the finding of objective evidence that the organization has implemented an EMS conforming to ISO 14001.
Establishing objective evidence requires a higher level of documentation and record keeping than is required for mere implementation of ISO 14001. The implementation of ISO 14001 is a simpler task for the organization when it is only seeking to implement the policy and sixteen procedures than when it is implementing with the intention or expectation of being audited.

The Future of ISO 14001

2009-09-30T06:47:00.000-07:00

ISO 14001 has the potential to reframe the conduct of environmental management. It has proven to be an elegant document that anticipates the needs of organizations of all sizes and purposes for direction on environmental management.
As ISO 14001 gains credibility as an effective system for managing and improving environmental performance, environmental regulators will be encouraged to accept registration to ISO 14001 in satisfaction of some regulatory administrative requirements and, thus, reduce the burden of compliance for those organizations that are managing their environmental exposures.
Ultimately, the greatest strides in environmental performance improvement and sustainability will come as a consequence of millions of organizations – municipalities, colleges and universities, governmental departments, and property owners and operators as well as industrial corporations – identifying and managing the environmental impacts of their activities, services, and products.

ISO 14001:2004 Environment Management System Audit

2009-09-30T06:46:00.002-07:00

ISO 14001 Section 4.5.4, Environmental Management System Audits, requires that organizations establish and maintain programs and procedures to conduct periodic EMS audits. The EMS audits must determine if the EMS:
• is properly implemented and maintained
• conforms to the planned arrangements
• meets the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard.

ISO 14001 Section 4.5.4 requires the programs and procedures to define:
• audit scope
• audit frequency
• audit methodologies
• responsibilities and requirements for conducting audit
• communication of the audit results.

Assessing the Corporate Impact of ISO 14000 Certification

2009-09-30T06:46:00.001-07:00

The 1990s have indeed been a period of change. This has seen a change from a perspective that longer viewed as something that is primarily done for publicity sake or to avoid prosecution. Rather it is recent emergence of the ISO 14000 environmental standard. There are several features that make this
emphasized trade-offs (you can have only one of the following ? shorter lead times, lower costs or higher quality) to a paradigm that stresses simultaneity (you can simultaneously achieve lower costs and higher quality and shorter lead times). This has also become a period when more and more managers are expected to become increasingly environmentally conscious. Being environmentally responsible is no seen as a matter of good business. An indication of the increasing importance of the environment is the new standard noteworthy. First, it builds on the success of ISO 9000, and its variants (e.g., QS 9000). Second, ISO 14000 is an international standard. It is hoped that it will replace the numerous and often conflicting standards found in various countries. Third, ISO 14000 shifts attention from the outcome (reduced pollution) to processes. However, being a new standard, the introduction of ISO 14000 has raised a number of questions, namely:

ISO 14000 – Environmental Program Management

2009-09-30T06:45:00.004-07:00

The ISO 14000 series of standards has
received widespread attention, and, like ISO 9000, it is becoming a requirementfor domestic and global organizations.
This document is intended to provide a
baseline understanding of the ISO 14000 standards and to discuss the current status of this important standard.
The International Organization for Geneva, Switzerland, is composed of 92 European Union (EU) to establish universal quality standards. Over time, ISO
Standardization (IOS), headquartered in member countries. Adherance to standards developed by the IOS is voluntary. However, countries and industries may adopt the IOS standards. Until approximately 15 years ago, IOS focused on traditional standards-setting activities. In 1987, IOS published the ISO 9000 series standards that were used with the 9000 became recognized as a positive indicator of quality and a prerequisite to establishing/maintaining business relationships within and outside the European Union.
In the United States, both the American
National Standards Institute and the American Society of Quality Control are privately funded organizations that have adopted ISO 9000, Quality Management, and the ISO 14000 standards.
ISO 14000 is the generic title given to 14040, ISO 14041, and ISO14050 have
the 14000 series of standards. ISO 14001, ISO 14004, ISO 14010, ISO 14011, ISO 14012, ISO 14020, ISO been published as international standards. The ISO 14000 series of standards consists of the following 18 subjects that can be grouped under two major headings:
14001 Specification with Guidance for Use
14004 General Guidelines on Principles,
14010 General Principles of Environmental Auditing
14011 Audit Procedures
14012 Environmental Auditing ? Qualification Criteria
14015 Environmental Site Assessments
14031 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Guidelines
14032 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Case Studies
14020 Goals and Principles of All Environmental Labeling
14021 Environmental Labels and Declarations ? Terms and Definitions
14024 Environmental Labels and
14025 Type III Labeling
14040 Life Cycle Assessment ? Principles and Framework
14041 Life Cycle Assessment ? Inventory Analysis
14042 Life Cycle Assessment ? ImpactAssessment
14043 Life Cycle Assessment ? Interpretation
14048 Life Cycle Indicator Format
14050 Guide on the Principles of Terminology Work

At the current time, the ISO 14000 as International Standards are referred to
Standards that have not been published as Draft International Standards (DIS). Most DIS are in the final review period before publication. If a particular standard is of interest and is not final, a copy of the DIS may be available for review.

The Development of EMS Standards

2009-09-30T06:45:00.003-07:00

The world’s first standard for environmental management systems (EMS) – BS 7750 – wasdeveloped and published by the British Standards Institution (BSI) in 1992. This standard was the model for the ISO 14000 Series developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14001, which establishes the requirements for an EMS, was finalized in 1996. BS 7750 was also the basis for the European Union’s Eco-Management and Audit scheme, known as EMAS.
ISO is an international standard and therefore must incorporate the different interests ofmany countries. This standard clearly has the weakest requirements. By contrast, EMAS is the most stringent and detailed standard reflecting the high environmental standards of German interests and companies which played a key role developing it.
Because ISO 14001 and EMAS are both based on BS 7750, all three standards arequite similar in their approach. If your organization complies with BS 7750 today, little effort will be needed to fullfill the requirements of ISO 14001 or EMAS. Be aware however, that EMAS emphasizes public environmental reporting.
Today there are two major areas in the evaluation of environmental management practice.One area focuses on organizational issues, and the other on products, services and processes.

1. Organization Evaluation
a. Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001, 14004)
b. Environmental Performance Evaluation (ISO 14014, 14015, 14031)
c. Environmental Auditing (ISO 14010, 14011, 14012, 14013, 14014)

2. Products, Services and Processes

a. Life Cycle Assessment (ISO 14040, 14041, 14042, 14043)

b. Environmental Labeling (ISO 14020, 14021, 14022, 14023, 1402X)

c. Environmental Aspects in Product Standards (ISO 14060)

Commitment and Environmental Policy

2009-09-30T06:45:00.001-07:00

An environmental policy is a statement of the organization’s overall aims and principles ofaction with respect to the environment, including compliance with all relevant stakeholders. As such, it should be written clearly and concisely to enable a
regulatory requirements. It is a key tool in communicating the environmental priorities of your organization to employees at all levels, as well as to external layperson to understand it, and should be made publicly available. It is up to the organization to decide on environmental priorities based on an initial environmental review, but these choices should be justified in the policy. To be truly effective the policy should regularly be reviewed and revised and incorporated into the organization’s overall corporate policy. The policy statement should set in writing a few achievable quantifiable priorities related to the environmental management system and the significant environmental effects found at the work-site. Furthermore, EMAS requires that the most signifcant environmental effects be mitigated within three years. Some form of improvement must also be accomplished from year-to-year by the organization and must be shown in the annual reports.

Although the formulation of policies and clear priorities is the most important step of
environmental management, this step is often neglected. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Environmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities but no clear direction. For an organization to be a credible and efficient environmental performer and to reap the benefits of being an environmental leader in its markets, the rationale for investing in environmental management must be very clear.

To ensure an organization’s commitment towards a formulated environmental policy, it is
essential that top management is involved in the process of formulating the policy and of setting priorities. Therefore the first step is to get the commitment from the highest level of management. Based on this commitment the organization should then conduct an initial environmental review and draft an environmental policy. This draft should be discussed and approved by the board of directors. Finally, the approved environmental policy statement must be communicated internally and made available to the public.

As the environmental policy establishes an overall sense of direction and sets the principles
of action for an organization, it requires commitment from the highest level of management. Top management should be involved in the development and adoption of an environmental policy.

Getting the commitment from the highest level should be argued on the basis of costs and the implementation of an EMS increases shareholder value it is easier for top
benefits and their impact on shareholder value. If management to commit themselves to approving an environmental policy and to implementing an environmental management system. This commitment includes three basic policy statements:
Continuous improvement in environmental performance
Compliance with environmental regulations

Maintaining public relations regarding environmental issues of the organization, its activities, products and services.

The central focus of the policy should be a commitment to continuous improvement. This

means improvement in the EMS itself and a decrease in environmental impacts caused by an organization’s activities, products and services. It is important for businesses to show improvement over time, both in environmental performance and in organizational commitment to this path.

A commitment to comply with at least local environmental regulations is a minimum
requirement for all of the environmental standards. However, multinationals operating in various environments and facing different laws in each, should think about which laws to abide by and if it is feasible to adopt the same standard worldwide. Generally, laws in newly industrializing countries are lax as compared to industrialized countries. However, given the increase in interest in environmental issues in these industrializing countries and the possible impact of the ISO 14000 series, it may be sound practice to adopt the more stringent laws in worldwide operations, where it is feasible to do so. In addition, the adoption of high standards worldwide can yield other benefits, such as an improved public image or easier technology transfer between different sites.

Companies should guard against going overboard in fulfilling environmental policies. Limits
are in fact set on how far a company has to go to reduce its environmental impacts. Reductions do not have to exceed levels which can be achieved by economically viable application of the best available technology (BAT).

Measurement and Evaluation In ISO 14001:2004

2009-09-30T06:44:00.003-07:00

After implementing the environmental policy, management needs to measure environmental that the data can be verified by an internal or external auditor.
interventions and their impact on the environment. This is done by building up an environmental effects register (environmental inventory). All equipment used for monitoring and measuring must be accurate and calibrated on a regular basis. To check the compliance status of an organization, additional information about regulations and other requirements is needed. A so called environmental regulations register?Eis often installed and maintained for this purpose. To obtain a better picture about the financial consequences of environmental protection, the accounting system should reflect environmental costs. Therefore, information about environmentally-induced costs and earnings needs to be collected. All this information should be recorded in such a manner.er
Environmental Performance Evaluation Accesses Environment Performance against environmental targets and objectives and against applicable environmental regulations. Responsibilities and authority need to be defined to deal with non-compliance within the EMS. This includes specifying the actions to be taken to correct an undesirable ituation and to prevent future non-compliance.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco
efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management. The recording of physical environmental data, environmental regulations and environmentally-induced financial information is necessary as a basis for effective decision making. Therefore, financial, legal and ecological data systems must be built up from scratch or adapted to the requirements of the EMS standard.

Basic QC and Six Sigma Tools

2009-09-30T06:44:00.001-07:00

The 7 QC Tools
The Seven Quality Control tools (7QC tools) are graphical and statistical tools which are most often used in QC for continuous improvement. Since they are so widely utilized by almost every level of the company, they have been nicknamed the Magnificent Seven. They are applicable to improvements in all dimensions of the process performance triangle: variation of quality, cycle time and yield of productivity.
Each one of the 7QC tools had been used separately before 1960. However, in the early 1960s, they were gathered together by a small group of Japanese scientists lead by Kaoru Ishikawa, with the aim of providing the QC Circles with effective and easy-to-use tools. They are, in alphabetical order, cause-and-effect diagram, check sheet, control chart, histogram, Pareto chart, scatter diagram and stratification. In Six Sigma, they are extensively used in all phases of the improvement methodology – define, measure, analyze, improve and control.
(1) Cause-and-effect diagram
An effective tool as part of a problem-solving process is the cause-and-effect diagram, also known as the Ishikawa diagram (after its originator) or fishbone diagram. This technique is useful to trigger ideas and promote a balanced approach in group brainstorming sessions where individuals list the perceived sources (causes) with respect to outcomes (effect).
When constructing a cause-and-effect diagram, it is often appropriate to consider six main causes that can contribute to an outcome response (effect): so-called 5M1E (man, machine, material, method, measurement, and environment).
When preparing a cause-and-effect diagram, the first step is to agree on the specific wording of the effect and then to identify the main causes that can possibly produce the effect. The main causes can often be identified as any of 5M1E, which helps us to get started, but these are by no means exhaustive.
Using brainstorming techniques, each main cause is analyzed. The aim is to refine the list of causes in greater detail until the root causes of that particular main cause are established. The same procedure is then followed for each of the other main causes. The method is a main cause, the pressure and the temperature are the causes, and “the pressure is low” and “the temperature is too high” are the root causes.
(2) Check sheet
The check sheet is used for the specific data collection of any desired characteristics of a process or product that is to be improved. It is frequently used in the measure phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, DMAIC. For practical purposes, the check sheet is commonly formatted as a table. It is important that the check sheet is kept simple and that its design is aligned to the characteristics that are measured. Consideration should be given as to who should gather the data and what measurement intervals to apply. For example, Figure 4.2 shows a check sheet for defect items in an assembly process of automobile ratios.
(3) Control chart
(a) Introduction
The control chart is a very important tool in the “analyze, improve and control” phases of the Six Sigma improvement methodology. In the “analyze” phase, control charts are applied to judge if the process is predictable; in the “improve” phase, to identify evidence of special causes of variation so that they can be acted on; in the “control” phase, to verify that the performance of the process is under control.
The original concept of the control chart was proposed by Walter A. Shewhart in 1924 and the tool has been used extensively in industry since the Second World War, especially in Japan and the USA after about 1980. Control charts offer the study of variation and its source. They can give process monitoring and control, and can also give direction for improvements. They can separate special from common cause issues of a process. They can give early identification of special causes so that there can be timely resolution before many poor quality products are produced. Shewhart control charts track processes by plotting data over time in the form shown in Figure 4.3. This chart can track either variables or attribute process parameters. The types of variable charts are process mean (x), range (R), standard deviation (s), individual value (x) and moving range (Rs). The attribute types are fraction nonconforming (p), number of nonconforming items (np), number of nonconformities (c), and nonconformities per unit (u).
(4) Histogram
It is meaningful to present data in a form that visually illustrates the frequency of occurrence of values. In the analysis phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, histograms are commonly applied to learn about the distribution of the data within the results Ys and the causes Xs collected in the measure phase and they are also used to obtain an understanding of the potential for improvements.
(5) Pareto chart
The Pareto chart was introduced in the 1940s by Joseph M.Juran, who named it after the Italian economist and statistician Vilfredo Pareto, 1848–1923. It is applied to distinguish the “vital few from the trivial many” as Juran formulated the purpose of the Pareto chart. It is closely related to the so-called 80/20 rule – “80% of the problems stem from 20% of the causes,” or in Six Sigma terms “80% of the poor values in Y stem from 20% of the Xs.”
In the Six Sigma improvement methodology, the Pareto chart has two primary applications. One is for selecting appropriate improvement projects in the define phase. Here it offers a very objective basis for selection, based on, for example, frequency of occurrence, cost saving and improvement potential in process performance.
The other primary application is in the analyze phase for identifying the vital few causes (Xs) that will constitute the greatest improvement in Y if appropriate measures are taken.
A procedure to construct a Pareto chart is as follows:
1) Define the problem and process characteristics to use in the diagram.
2) Define the period of time for the diagram – for example, weekly, daily, or shift.
Quality improvements over time can later be made from the information determined within this step.
3) Obtain the total number of times each characteristic occurred.
4) Rank the characteristics according to the totals from
(6) Scatter diagram
The scatter plot is a useful way to discover the relationship between two factors, X and Y, i.e., the correlation. An important feature of the scatter plot is its visualization of the correlation pattern, through which the relationship can be determined. In the improve phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, one often searches the collected data for Xs that have a special influence on Y. Knowing the existence of such relationships, it is possible to identify input variables that
cause special variation of the result variable. It can then be determined how to set the input variables, if they are controllable, so that the process is improved. When several Xs may influence the values of Y, one scatter plot should be drawn for each combination of the Xs and Y.
(7) Stratification
Stratification is a tool used to split collected data into subgroups in order to determine if any of them contain special cause variation. Hence, data from different sources in a process can be separated and analyzed individually. Stratification is mainly used in the analyze phase to stratify data in the
search for special cause variation in the Six Sigma improvement methodology.
The most important decision in using stratification is to determine the criteria by which to stratify. Examples can be machines, material, suppliers, shifts, day and night, age groups and so on. It is common to stratify into two groups. If the number of observations is large enough, more detailed stratification is also possible.

TQM and Six Sigma

2009-09-30T06:43:00.004-07:00

While Six Sigma is definitely succeeding in creating some impressive results and culture changes in some influential organizations, it is certainly not yet a widespread success. Total Quality Management (TQM) seems less visible in many businesses than it was in the early 1990s. However, many companies are still engaged in improvement efforts based on the principles and tools of TQM. It appears at least in Korea that Six Sigma is succeeding while TQM is losing its momentum.
One of the problems that plagued many of the early TQM initiatives was the preeminence placed on quality at the expense of all other aspects of the business. Some organizations experienced severe financial consequences in the rush to make quality “first among equals.” The disconnection between management systems designed to measure customer satisfaction and those designed to measure provider profitability often led to unwise investments in quality, which has been often practiced in TQM. Ronald Snee (1999) points out that although some people believe it is nothing new, Six Sigma is unique in its approach and deployment. He defines Six Sigma as a strategic business improvement approach that seeks to increase both customer satisfaction and an organization’s financial health. Snee goes on to claim that the following eight characteristics account for Six Sigma’s increasing bottom-line (net income or profit) success and popularity with executives.
• Bottom-line results expected and delivered
• Senior management leadership
• A disciplined approach (DMAIC)
• Rapid (3–6 months) project completion
• Clearly defined measures of success
• Infrastructure roles for Six Sigma practitioners and leadership
• Focus on customers and processes
• A sound statistical approach to improvement
Other quality initiatives including TQM have laid claim to a subset of these characteristics, but only Six Sigma attributes its success to the simultaneous application of all eight. Six Sigma is regarded as a vigorous rebirth of quality ideals and methods, as these are applied with even greater passion and commitment than often was the case in the past. Six Sigma is revealing a potential for success that goes beyond the levels of improvement achieved through the many TQM efforts. Some of the mistakes of yesterday’s TQM efforts certainly might be repeated in a Six Sigma initiative if we are not careful.
A review of some of the major TQM pitfalls, as well as hints on how the Six Sigma system can keep them from derailing our efforts is listed below.
1. Links to the business and bottom-line success:
In TQM, quality often was a “sidebar” activity, separated from the key issues of business strategy and performance. The link to the business and bottom-line success was undermined, despite the term “total” quality, since the effort actually was limited to product and manufacturing functions. Six Sigma emphasizes reduction of costs, thereby contributing to the bottom-line, and participation of three major areas: manufacturing, R&D and service parts.
2. Top-level management leadership:
In many TQM efforts, top-level management’s skepticism has been apparent, or their willingness to drive quality ideas has been weak. Passion for and belief in Six Sigma at the very summit of the business is unquestioned in companies like
Motorola, GE, Allied Signal (now Honeywell), LG and Samsung. In fact, top-level management involvement is the beginning of Six Sigma.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.
4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money to help people meet those standards.
5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.
6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.

4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money
to help people meet those standards.

5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.

6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success

ISO 9000 Series and Six Sigma

2009-09-30T06:43:00.003-07:00

ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 9000 series standards were first published in 1987, revised in 1994, and re-revised in 2000 by the ISO. The 2000 revision, denoted by ISO 9000:2000, has attracted broad expectations in industry.
As of the year 2001, more than 300,000 organizations world-wide have been certified to the ISO 9000 series standards. It embodies a consistent pair of standards, ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000, both of which have been significantly updated and modernized. The ISO 9001:2000 standard specifies requirements for a quality management system for which third-party certification is possible, whereas ISO 9004:2000 provides guide- lines for a comprehensive quality management system and performance improvement through Self-Assessment.
The origin and historical development of ISO 9000 and Six Sigma are very different. The genesis of ISO 9000 can be traced back to the standards that the British aviation industry and the U.S. Air Force developed in the 1920s to reduce the need for inspection by approving the conformance of suppliers’ product quality. These standards developed into requirements for suppliers’ quality assurance systems in a number of western countries in the 1970s. In 1987 they were amalgamated into the ISO 9000 series standards.
Independent of ISO 9000, the same year also saw the launch of Six Sigma at Motorola and the launch of Self-Assessment by means of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in USA. Both Six Sigma and Self-Assessment can be traced back to Walter A. Shewhart and his work on variation and continuous improvement in the 1920s. It was Japanese industry that pioneered a broad application of these ideas from the 1950s through to the 1970s. When variation and continuous improvement caught the attention of some of the American business leaders in the late 1980s, it took the form of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, on a national level, and of Six Sigma at Motorola.
Some people are wondering if the ISO 9000:2000 series standards make Six Sigma superfluous. They typically refer to clause 8 of ISO 9001: “Measurement, analysis, improvement.”
It requires that companies install procedures in operations for the measurement of processes and data analysis using statistical techniques with the demonstration of continuous improvement . They also partly refer to the ISO 9004:2000 standards that embody guidelines and criteria for Self-Assessment similar to the national quality awards.
The author firmly believes that Six Sigma is needed regardless of whether a company is compliant with the ISO 9000 series. The two initiatives are not mutually exclusive and the objectives in applying them are different. A Six Sigma program is applied in organizations based on its top-line and bottom-line rationales. The primary objective for applying the ISO 9000 series standards is to demonstrate the company’s capability to consistently provide conforming products and/or services. Therefore, the ISO 9000 series standard falls well short of making Six Sigma superfluous.
The ISO 9000 series standards have from their early days been regarded and practiced by industry as a minimum set of requirements for doing business. The new ISO 9000:2000 stan
dards do not represent a significant change to this perspective. Six Sigma on the other hand, aims at world-class performance, based on a pragmatic framework for continuous improvement.
The author believes that Six Sigma is superior in such important areas as rate of improvement, bottom-line and top-line results, customer satisfaction, and top-level management commitment. However, considering the stronghold of ISO 9000 in industry, Six Sigma and ISO 9000 are likely to be applied by the same organization, but for very different purposes.

Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma

2009-09-30T06:43:00.001-07:00

(1) What is lean manufacturing?
Currently there are two premier approaches to improving manufacturing operations. One is lean manufacturing (hereinafter referred to as “lean”) and the other is Six Sigma.
Lean evaluates the entire operation of a factory and restructures the manufacturing method to reduce wasteful activities like waiting, transportation, material hand-offs,inventory, and over-production. It reduces variation associated with manufacturing routings, material handling, storage, lack of communication, batch production and so forth. Six Sigma tools, on the other hand, commonly focus on specific part numbers and processes to reduce variation. The combination of the two approaches represents a formidable opponent to variation in that it includes both layout of the factory and a focus on specific part numbers and processes.
Lean and Six Sigma are promoted as different approaches and different thought processes. Yet, upon close inspection, both approaches attack the same enemy and behave like two links within a chain – that is, they are dependent on each other for success. They both battle variation, but from two different points of view. The integration of Lean and Six Sigma takes two powerful problem-solving techniques and bundles them into a powerful package. The two approaches should be viewed as complements to each other rather than as equiva
lents of or replacements for each other (Pyzdek, 2000). In practice, manufacturers that have widely adopted lean practices record performance metrics superior to those achieved by plants that have not adopted lean practices. Those practices cited as lean in a recent industrial survey (Jusko, 1999) include
• quick changeover techniques to reduce setup time;
• adoption of manufacturing cells in which equipment and workstations are arranged sequentially to facilitate small-lot, continuous-flow production;
• just-in-time (JIT) continuous-flow production techniques to reduce lot sizes, setup time, and cycle time; and,
• JIT supplier delivery in which parts and materials are delivered to the shop floor on a frequent and as-needed basis.
(2) Differences between Lean and Six Sigma
There are some differences between Lean and Six Sigma as noted below.
• Lean focuses on improving manufacturing operations in variation, quality and productivity. However, Six Sigma focuses not only on manufacturing operations, but also on all possible processes including R&D and service areas.
• Generally speaking, a Lean approach attacks variation differently than a Six Sigma system does (Denecke, 1998) as shown in Figure 5.4. Lean tackles the most common form of process noise by aligning the organization in such a way that it can begin working as a coherent whole instead of as separate units. Lean seeks to co-locate, in sequential order, all the processes required to produce a product. Instead of focusing on the part number, Lean focuses on product flow and on the operator. Setup time, machine maintenance and routing of processes are important measures in Lean. However, Six Sigma focuses on defective rates and costs of poor quality due to part variation and process variation based on measured data.
• The data-driven nature of Six Sigma problem-solving lends itself well to lean standardization and the physical rearrangement of the factory. Lean provides a solid foundation for Six Sigma problem-solving where the system is measured by deviation from and improvements to the standard.
• While Lean emphasizes standardization and productivity, Six Sigma can be more effective at tackling process noise and cost of poor quality.

Seven Steps for Six Sigma Introduction

2009-09-30T06:42:00.003-07:00

When a company intends to introduce Six Sigma for its new management strategy, we would like to recommend the following seven-step procedures:
1. Top-level management commitment for Six Sigma is first and foremost. The CEO of the corporation or business unit should genuinely accept Six Sigma as the management strategy. Then organize a Six Sigma team and set up the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company.
2. Start Six Sigma education for Champions first. Then start the education for WBs, GBs, BBs and MBBs in sequence. Every employee of the company should take the WB education first and then some of the WBs receive the GB education, and finally some of the GBs receive the BB education. However, usually MBB education is practiced in professional organizations.
3. Choose the area in which Six Sigma will be first introduced.
4. Deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. The most important is the company’s deployment of big CTQy from the standpoint of customer satisfaction. Appoint BBs as full-time project leaders and ask them to solve some important CTQ problems.
5. Strengthen the infrastructure for Six Sigma, including measurement systems, statistical process control (SPC), knowledge management (KM), database management system (DBMS) and so on.
6. Designate a Six Sigma day each month, and have the progress of Six Sigma reviewed by top-level management.
7. Evaluate the company’s Six Sigma performance from the customers’ viewpoint, benchmark the best company in the world, and revise the Six Sigma roadmap if necessary. Go to step 1 for further improvement.
First of all, a handful or a group of several members should be appointed as a Six Sigma team to handle all kinds of Six Sigma tasks. The team is supposed to prepare proper education and the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company. We can say that this is the century of the 3Cs, which are Changing society, Customer satisfaction and Competition in quality. The Six Sigma vision should be well matched to these 3Cs. Most importantly, all employees in the company should agree to and respect this long-term vision.
Second, Six Sigma can begin from proper education for all classes of the company. The education should begin from the top managers, so called Champions. If Champions do not understand the real meaning of Six Sigma, there is no way for Six Sigma to proceed further in the company. After Champion’s education, GB BB MBB education should be completed in sequence.
Third, we can divide Six Sigma into three parts according to its characteristics. They are R&D Six Sigma, manufacturing Six Sigma, and Six Sigma for non-manufacturing areas. The R&D Six Sigma is often called DFSS (Design for Six Sigma). It is usually not wise to introduce Six Sigma to all areas at the same time. The CEO should decide the order of introduction to these three areas. It is common to introduce Six Sigma to manufacturing processes first, and then service areas and R&D areas. However, the order really depends on the current circumstances of the company.
Fourth, deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. These CTQs can be deployed by policy management or by management by objectives. Some important CTQs should be given to BBs to solve as project themes. In principle, the BBs who lead the project teams work as full-time workers until the projects are finished.

Conducting An Initial Environmental Review For EMS

2009-09-30T06:42:00.001-07:00

Conducting An Initial Environmental Review in ISO 14001 EMSAn initial environmental review covers all the aspects of an EMS. As a result of this review the organization knows its strengths and weaknesses, risks and opportunities regarding the current status of its EMS. The gap between the requirements of the EMS standard and the actual status of the organization shows which aspects the organization should focus its efforts on to improve the system. This leads directly to the development of an environmental management program that should fill the gaps.The Environmental review should focus on three key areas:- Examination of existing environmental management practices and procedures- Identification of significant environmental impacts and their priority- Identification of legal and regulatory requirements1. Examination of Existing Environmental Management Practices andProceduresThe methodology for assessing existing environmental management practices and procedures is proposed here using a questionnaire. The review team fills out this questionnaire by interviewing appropriate people, by analyzing existing documents and procedures dealing with environmental issues and by collecting information about environmental aspects of the organization’s operations, products and services.By conducting the initial environmental review, an organization-specific profile of strengths and weaknesses can be drawn up. Because the score in each EMS area shows the effort needed in terms of financial and human resources,the organization knows where to focus its efforts when building up an EMS and where the largest effort is needed.
2. Identification of Significant Environmental Aspects and their PriorityAn environmental policy requires top management to set priorities regarding environmental aspects. An initial review clearly shows where to set priorities regarding the EMS itself. But, it does not help to set priorities among different environmental problems. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Eenvironmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities, but no clear direction. One way to solve this problem is to develop a so called ?Environmental exposure portfolio?EThe first step of this portfolio analysis is to assess the exposure and therefore the importance of different environmental aspects for an organization’s overall performance.The appropriate perspective and priorities of the environmental policy will differ depending on this preliminary analysis. The analysis should be conducted from the perspective of the stakeholders of the organization, their needs and their importance for the success of the organization. The degree of exposure to different environmental aspects should guide the involvement and perspective of an organization when implementing an EMS. Evaluating exposure to environmental aspects is important, because this exposure is likely to influence the organization’s success sooner or later, either through new legislation, public or consumer perception and behavior or otherwise.The analysis of the expected exposure of an organization to different environmental problems and the weight given to these aspects by various stakeholders enables management to focus on environmental issues that are a high priority to the organization. This is represented in the quadrant in the upper right corner of the environmental exposure portfolio. However, the two quadrants on the left must also be observed, although less vigorously. Issues with low public priority, to which the firm contributes heavily become a problem as soon as the perception of the stakeholders and the public environmental policy changes (the quadrant in the upper left corner of the portfolio). That this can happen very rapidly is obvious, for example from Shell`s ?Brent Spar?Edumping case (detailed information about this case is available from Shell or Greenpeace at their respective WWW-sites). Investments in new production technology, products and services can increase the environmental impact of the organization when not anticipated early enough. In this case, a problem ranked in the lower right corner of the portfolio would shift to the field with the highest priority. Problems ranked in the lower left corner are of no priority. No measures should be taken here.
3. Identification of Legal and Regulatory RequirementsThe identification of legal and regulatory requirements assesses two levels of an organization:- production-related environmental regulations- product- and service-related environmental regulationsThe former addresses the production department while the latter addresses the marketingand R&D departments. Basically, three questions must be answered:- Which are the relevant environmental regulations? (= target)- Is the current situation in the organization known? (= actual)- Does the organization comply with relevant regulations? (=gap)The methodology used here is a questionnaire. To obtain information about environmental regulations the following information sources can be used:- governmental authorities- industry associations- daily newspaper- university publications (law departments)

Emergency Preparedness and Response In ISO 14001

2009-09-30T06:41:00.004-07:00

Emergency Preparedness and Response In ISO 14001
Under the Emergency Preparedness and Response requirement of ISO 14001:2004 (§4.4.7), the organization is required to establish procedures for identifying the potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents that can have an impact on the environment.
Identification of Potential Emergency and Accident Situations – Experience indicates that organizations infrequently have a preexisting procedure for identifying potential emergency and accident situations.The norm is to establish emergency and accident responses for a variety of emergency and accident situations irrespective of the potential for their occurrence. But ISO 14001 is specific about requiring a procedure to identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents. Adhering to the requirement of the procedure is a valuable exercise that helps organizations identify weaknesses in their own emergency planning and to plan for that which is most likely to occur.Because many environmental impacts of an emergency or accident situation are secondary in nature, it appears that all potential emergency or accident situations need to be identified before a determination of environmental impacts can be made. An organization that attempts to identify potential emergency or accident situations based on a review of its environmental aspects would likely miss the environmental impact potential of, say, an automobile accident.
There are five steps implied by the emergency preparedness and response requirement:
1) Identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents of all kinds;2) Paying particular attention to the potential environmental impacts of accidents and emergency situations, identify how the organization can prevent and mitigate associated adverse environmental impacts;3) Determine how the organization and its employees should respond to emergency situations and accidents;4) Periodically simulate emergency situations to test response capabilities; and,5) Review and revise procedures based on experience derived from actual and simulated emergency situations and accidents.
Accident and Emergency Situation Identification – In order to identify potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents, the organization should develop a procedure for systematically identifying accident and emergency situations, evaluating their probability of occurrence, their likely consequences, and their severity.Organizations often engage risk management specialists to assist in the identification of potential emergency or accident situations that could lead to human injury, environmental damage, or economic loss. While many checklists are available to facilitate this kind of evaluation, there is virtually no substitute for physical evaluation of facilities by knowledgeable personnel, whether employees or outside professionals.
Emergency Response Procedures – The organization is required to develop procedures for responding to emergency situations and accidents when they occur. Typically, response procedures include identifying public emergency response agencies and their capabilities, identifying individuals within the organization who are trained and able to provide assistance in emergencies, establishing an emergency communications network, and providing emergency lighting, signage, and equipment. Because Emergency Response Procedures are based on identified potential emergency situations and accidents specific to the organization, the emergency response plan will be unique for each organization.
Periodic Testing – The value of conducting emergency response exercises lies not only with simulating situations that could occur but also in identifying flaws in the response plan. Practice drills can be the most effective test of the system to give employees, emergency response personnel, and management the opportunity to walk through the plan and gain familiarity with its procedures. While a full-dress response exercise is valuable, testing of procedures can be effectively done on much smaller scales and still provide the benefits of testing. Above all, the organization should not let the impracticality of a full-dress exercise keep it from testing sub elements of the emergency response plan.
Review and Revise – ISO 14001 calls for continual improvement of the EMS. Periodically reviewing and revising emergency response plans based on the experience gained from the occurrence of emergency situations or accidents or in testing response plans is an example of continual improvement.
Written Response Plans – Many written emergency response plans are too cumbersome to be of value in an emergency situation – their value depends entirely upon previous training of persons who will be called upon to execute them. Yet, many organizations fail to provide the emergency response training necessary to make the plans functional.Keeping in mind that even the simplest, most direct emergency response plan requires training for effective implementation, an alternative for organizations to consider is establishment of abbreviated, readily available Immediate Response Directions established for each kind of potential emergency situation or accident. Such an emergency response plan might consist of a laminated card prepared for each potential emergency situation or accident and providing specific responsibilities and associated actions for employees and visitors, supervisors, emergency coordinators, and emergency directors.

Migration to ISO 9001:2008

2009-09-30T06:41:00.003-07:00

Migration To ISO 9001:2008The International Accreditation Forum (IAF) and the International Organization forStandardization (ISO) have agreed on an implementation plan to ensure a smooth transition ofaccredited certification to ISO 9001:2008, the latest version of the world’s most widely usedstandard for quality management systems (QMS). The details of the plan are given in the jointcommuniqué by the two organizations which appears below.Like all of ISO’s more than 17 000 standards, ISO 9001 is periodically reviewed to ensure that itis maintained at the state of the art and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise thedocument.ISO 9001:2008, which is due to be published before the end of the year, will replace the year2000 version of the standard which is implemented by both business and public sectororganizations in 170 countries. Although certification is not a requirement of the standard, theQMS of about one million organizations have been audited and certified by independentcertification bodies (also known in some countries as registration bodies) to ISO 9001:2000.ISO 9001 certification is frequently used in both private and public sectors to increaseconfidence in the products and services provided by certified organizations, between partnersin business-to-business relations, in the selection of suppliers in supply chains and in the rightto tender for procurement contracts.ISO is the developer and publisher of ISO 9001, but does not itself carry out auditing andcertification. These services are performed independently of ISO by certification bodies. ISOdoes not control such bodies, but does develop voluntary International Standards toencourage good practice in their activities on a worldwide basis. For example, ISO/IEC17021:2006 specifies the requirements for bodies providing auditing and certification ofmanagement systems.Certification bodies that wish to provide further confidence in their services may apply to be“accredited” as competent by an IAF recognized national accreditation body. ISO/IEC17011:2004 specifies the requirements for carrying out such accreditation. IAF is aninternational association whose membership includes the national accreditation bodies of 49economies.ISO technical committee ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, which isresponsible for the ISO 9000 family of standards, is preparing a number of support documentsexplaining what the differences are between ISO 9001:2008 and the year 2000 version, whyand what they mean for users. Once approved, these documents will be posted on the ISOWeb site – probably in October 2008.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and the IAF (International AccreditationForum) have agreed an implementation plan to ensure a smooth migration of accreditedcertification to ISO 9001:2008, after consultation with international groupings representingquality system or auditor certification bodies, and industry users of ISO 9001 certificationservices.ISO 9001:2008 does not contain any new requirementsThey have recognized that ISO 9001:2008 introduces no new requirements. ISO 9001:2008only introduces clarifications to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eightyears of experience of implementing the standard world wide with about one millioncertificates issued in 170 countries to date. It also introduces changes intended to improveconsistency with ISO14001:2004The agreed implementation plan in relation to accredited certification is therefore thefollowing:Accredited certification to the ISO 9001:2008 shall not be granted until the publication of ISO9001:2008 as an International Standard.Certification of conformity to ISO 9001:2008 and/or national equivalents shall only be issuedafter official publication of ISO 9001:2008 (which should take place before the end of 2008)and after a routine surveillance or recertification audit against ISO 9001:2008.Validity of certifications to ISO 9001:2000One year after publication of ISO 9001:2008 all accredited certifications issued (newcertifications or recertifications) shall be to ISO 9001:2008.Twenty four months after publication by ISO of ISO 9001:2008, any existing certification issuedto ISO 9001:2000 shall not be valid.

Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Preventive Action in ISO 14001 EMS

2009-09-30T06:41:00.001-07:00

The intent of §4.5.3 is that the organization put in place procedures for 1) identifying actual and potential nonconformities to EMS requirements, 2) taking appropriate corrective or preventive action, and 3) reviewing the effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions taken.The nonconformity requirement of ISO 14001:1996 was a passive requirement in that it was only triggered when a nonconformity came to the attention of the organization through one of the other EMS procedures, such as the EMS audit or management review. ISO 14001:2004, however, requires that the organization establish and maintain procedures to identify actual or potential nonconformities, determine their causes, take action to avoid recurrence or occurrence, record results, and review effectiveness of corrective or preventive actions.
How the organization goes about identifying actual or potential nonconformities is up to it to determine. From the standpoint of registration auditors, it would seem that they would want to see a specific procedure requiring members of the organization to conduct some kind of periodic checklist driven, walk-through inspection for nonconformities. In addition, the procedure should allow for submission of nonconformities by any member of the organization. Actual nonconformities are usually fairly evident and relatively easy to investigate because there is a tangible occurrence with which to deal. The organization should also want to evaluate minor instances of nonconformity that, while not significant in and of themselves, if they occurred under different circumstances, could lead to a significant deviation from the EMS. Such “near misses” could be identified by the occurrence of a sudden, unexpected event, a failure to achieve an objective or target, or a deviation from the Environmental Policy.Potential nonconformities are more difficult to identify and correct. Here, application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis would be appropriate for organizations having that capability.
When investigating nonconformities, organizations should focus on identifying underlying root causes, not just the immediate manifestation of the problem. If a chemical storage drum leaks, the organization should take action, first, to mitigate the damage and, then, to determine why the leak occurred; e.g., improper or negligent handling, mechanical failure, or lack of a leak detection system. Corrective or preventive actions should then focus on eliminating the cause through training, communication of procedures, use of leak-resistant drums, or installation of a leak detection system.
Other ISO 14001 sections, principally Emergency Preparedness and Response, Internal Audit, and Management Review, are tools that the organization implements in order to help identify instances of actual or potential nonconformity. The underlying principle of these sections is that the identification of nonconformities should be made by the organization through diligent application of these tools, not from the occurrence of an environmental event, a customer or community complaint, or investigation by a regulatory authority. While §4.5.3 does not specifically mention disciplinary action, in many cases disciplinary action or the threat of disciplinary action is appropriate to prevention of future nonconformities. Many organizations have written codes of conduct that give employees notice that deviations from the codes will not be tolerated and that prescribed penalties can result for infractions. These codes can be expanded to include penalties for deviations from the EMS. If so, penalties should be commensurate with the violation itself and should acknowledge the nature of the environmental damage, the degree of negligence, prior conduct, and the forthrightness of the employee being disciplined. Any such code and its remedies should be administered fairly and consistently and should have as its objective correction and prevention of EMS nonconformities, not punishment of employees.Finally, identification, investigation, and correction of nonconformities leads to the need to revise documented procedures.

Evaluation Of Compliance Of ISO 14001 EMS

2009-09-30T06:40:00.004-07:00

The requirement to establish a procedure for periodically evaluating compliance with applicable legal and other requirements falls short of specifically requiring regulatory compliance audits but, in fact, a system of regular regulatory compliance audits may be the most practical means for meeting this requirement of the standard. In the U.S., determination of whether to conduct a compliance audit will be governed in part by the particular jurisdiction’s approach to allowing a legal privilege for the self-assessment audit.
Evaluation vs. Audit – The difference between an evaluation and audit can only be determined by looking outside of ISO 14001. Consulting a dictionary reveals that an evaluation involves a determination of value or worth and that an audit is an examination of accounts done by persons appointed for the purpose. A better definition `is the more specific ISO 19011:2002, Guidelines for Quality and/or Environmental Management Systems Auditing, which defines an audit as a “systematic, independent, and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria are fulfilled.” Many organizations do not have a system for evaluating regulatory compliance other than their own records and the inspections of regulatory officials. This lack of a verification system can be a risky way to operate. Reports of enforcement actions and consent agreements show that many organizations are blindsided by rogue employees who violate rules and falsify documents to cover up environmental misdeeds. Although ISO 14001 does not prescribe a specific approach to evaluation of regulatory compliance, organizations should consider methods for going beyond verification of records by collecting and evaluating physical evidence.

Continual improvement in the quality management In ISO 9001

2009-09-30T06:40:00.003-07:00

Continual improvement in the quality management system and its processes In ISO 9001
The standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results andcontinual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
This requirement responds to the Continual Improvement principle. If the management system is enabling the organization to accomplish its objectives when that is its purpose, why improve? The need for improvement arises out of a need to become more effective at what you do, more efficient in the utilization of resources so that the organization becomes best in its class. The purpose of measuring process performance is to establish whether or not the objectives are being achieved and if not to take action on the difference. If the performance targets are being achieved, opportunities may well exist to raise standards and increase efficiency and effectiveness.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higherIncrease efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning in Chapter 5. There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement (Juran, J. M., 1995)12 .1 Determine current performance2 Establish the need for change3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives4 Organize diagnostic resources5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of currentperformance6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvementobjectives7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changeswill be implemented8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change9 Implement the change10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one.

Preparing the ISO 9001 quality manual

2009-09-30T06:40:00.001-07:00

The standard requires a quality manual to be establishedand maintained that includes the scope of the qualitymanagement system, the documented procedures or refer-ence to them and a description of the sequence andinteraction of processes included in the quality manage-ment system.
ISO 9000 defines a quality manual as a documentspecifying the quality management system of an organi-zation. It is therefore not intended that themanual be a response to the requirements ofISO 9001. As the top-level document describingthe management system it is a system descriptiondescribing how the organization is managed.Countless quality manuals produced to satisfy ISO 9000 :2008, were nomore than 20 sections that paraphrased the requirements of the standard.Such documentation adds no value. They are of no use to managers, staff orauditors. Often thought to be useful to customers, organizations would gainno more confidence from customers than would be obtained from theirregistration certificate.
This requirement responds to the System Approach Principle.A description of the management system is necessary as a means of showinghow all the processes are interconnected and how they collectively deliver thebusiness outputs. It has several uses as :a means to communicate the vision, values, mission, policies and objectivesof the organizationa means of showing how the system has been designeda means of showing linkages between processesa means of showing who does whatan aid to training new peoplea tool in the analysis of potential improvementsa means of demonstrating compliance with external standards and regulations
When formulating the policies, objectives and identifying the processes toachieve them, the manual provides a convenient vehicle for containing suchinformation. If left as separate pieces of information, it may be more difficult tosee the linkages.The requirement provides the framework for the manual. Its content maytherefore include the following:1 Introduction(a) Purpose (of the manual)(b) Scope (of the manual)(c) Applicability (of the manual)(d) Definitions (of terms used in the manual)2 Business overview(a) Nature of the business/organization – its scope of activity, its productsand services(b) The organization’s interested parties (customers, employees, regulators,shareholders, suppliers, owners etc.)(c) The context diagram showing the organization relative to its externalenvironment(d) Vision, values(e) Mission3 Organization(a) Function descriptions(b) Organization chart(c) Locations with scope of activity4 Business processes(a) The system model showing the key business processes and how they areinterconnected(b) System performance indicators and method of measurement(c) Business planning process description(d) Resource management process description(e) Marketing process description(f) Product/service generation processes description(g) Sales process description(h) Order fulfilment process description5 Function matrix (Relationship of functions to processes)6 Location matrix (Relationship of locations to processes)7 Requirement deployment matrices(a) ISO 9001 compliance matrix(b) ISO 14001 compliance matrix(c) Regulation compliance matrices (FDA, Environment, Health, Safety,CAA etc.)8 Approvals (List of current product, process and system approvals)

Scope of the ISO 9001 quality management system

2009-09-30T06:39:00.003-07:00

The standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion.
The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9000 :2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because itoperated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the management system.
This requirement responds to the System Approach Principle.It is sensible to describe the scope of the management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor.
Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical tojustify inclusions.
The scope of the management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’. It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable. For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.

Managing processes In ISO 9001 Standard

2009-09-30T06:39:00.001-07:00

The standard requires the organization to manage the identified processes in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001. The first stage in managing a process is to establish what it is you are trying to achieve, what requirements you need to satisfy, what goals you are aiming at; then establish how you will measure your achievements. The next stage is to define the process you will employ to deliver the results. Managing the process then involves managing all the inherentcharacteristics of the process in such a manner that the requirements of customers and interested parties are fulfilled by the process outcomes. This means:Managing the process inputsManaging the workManaging the physical resourcesManaging the financial resourcesManaging the human resourcesManaging the constraintsManaging the outputs
Process management is therefore much more than managing activities and therefore when describing processes, one needs more than a flow chart of activities. The chart is a diagrammatical representation of a process but only one aspect. One can also add numerical data to the charts to indicate resources, cycle times, delays, costs etc. but the intangible factors of the human environment cannot be reduced to numerical data to add to the charts.
The notes to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001 need some explanation. It is stated that the processes needed for the management system include management activities, provision of resources, product realization and measurement. This note could cause confusion because it suggests that these are the processes that are needed for the management system. It would be unwise to use this as the model and far better to identify the processes from observing how the business operates. The term provision of resources should be Resource Management, which is thecollection of processes covering financial, human and physical resources.
Product realization is also a collection of processes such as design, production, service delivery, etc. Measurement is not a single process but a sub-process within each process. Grouping all the measurement processes together serves no useful purpose except it matches the standard – a purpose of little value in managing the organization.
The second note refers to outsourcing processes although it is difficult to imagine that management activities, product realization or measurement would be outsourced in its entirety. It is likely that market research; design, product verification, equipment calibration and other specialized services may be outsourced. While outsourcing comes under purchasing, it is correct to point out that the organization should control any outsourced processes. The supplier of the process is usually referred to as a subcontractor because they provide services to the organization’s requirements not their own. Control of subcontractors is covered by clause 7.4 but in meeting clause 7.4.3, you need to treat suppliers and subcontractors differently.

ISO 9001 Quality Policy

2009-09-30T06:38:00.003-07:00

On customersWe will listen to our customers, understand and balance their needs andexpectations with those of our suppliers, employees, investors and society andendeavour to give full satisfaction to all parties.On leadershipWe will establish and communicate our vision for the organization and throughour leadership exemplify core values to guide the behaviour of all to achieve ourvision.On peopleWe will involve our people in the organization’s development, utilize theirknowledge and experience, recognize their contribution and provide an environ-ment in which they are motivated to realize their full potential.On processes and systemsWe will take a process approach towards the management of work and manage ourprocesses as a single system of interconnected processes that delivers all theorganization’s objectives.On continual improvementWe will provide an environment in which every person is motivated tocontinually improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our products, processes andour management system.On decisionsWe will base our decisions on the logical and intuitive analysis of data collectedwhere possible from accurate measurements of product, process and systemcharacteristics.On supplier relationshipsWe will develop alliances with our suppliers and work with them to jointlyimprove performance.http://www.iso-consults.com http://www.iso9001store.com http://www.iso14000store.com

ISO 9001 Quality Policy

2009-09-30T06:38:00.002-07:00

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System Standard

2009-09-30T06:38:00.001-07:00

ISO 9001:2008 is the world most successful standard addressing best practice in the application of quality management systems.
The standard is based around the principles of customer satisfaction, continual improvement and the development of a process based quality management system. Although not referenced in the standard itself the ISO 9001:2008 document is underpinned by eight key quality management principles;
a customer focused organisation
leadership
the involvement of people
ensuring a process approach
a systematic approach to management
a factual approach to decision making
mutually beneficial supplier relations
continuous improvement
ISO 9001:2008 has been written to ensure that its guiding principles are equally relevant to all sectors of industry and to all types of organisation. Although containing requirements to control the key processes within an organisation, it only requires six documented procedures. The standard emphasises the need for an organisation to continually monitor their own processes and systems, with many clauses making reference to self monitoring or measurement or both. This emphasis aims for an integrated approach to business processes. Instead of operating to a business plan on one hand and a quality management system on the other, the standard aims to integrate both of these functions into one system.
What is a quality management system?ISO 9001:2008 is a standard that specifies criteria for a quality management system (QMS). A QMS incorporates those elements of an organisations management system that direct and control it with regard to quality. Such a system will need to be supported by top management who will need to be able to demonstrate management commitment.
How do you demonstrate management commitment?Management commitment is one of the cornerstones of ISO 9001:2008, requiring top management to develop and improve the QMS throughout the organisation. This commitment can be demonstrated by a number of methods including creating a quality policy, conducting management reviews and establishing quality objectives.
What is a quality policy?ISO 9001:2008 specifies that an organisation must have a quality policy that documents the organisations overall intentions and direction related to quality as formally expressed by top management. Such a policy will include a commitment to comply with ISO 9001:2008, to continuously improve the QMS and to set and monitor measurable quality objectives.
What are quality objectives?The quality objectives are those targets sought or aimed for by the organisation that are related to quality. These quality objectives must be SMART (suitable, measurable, achievable, reviewed and timely). Examples of quality objectives might be; to reduce machine down time by 20% or to reduce rework costs by ?00 p/m. Whatever quality objectives are chosen they must be meaningful and adequately resourced by the organisation.
What is a management review?A management review is a key element of how the top management of an organisation can assess its performance in terms of the objectives it sets itself, the requirements set by the standard and how its systems are operating. Normally, a management review is a regular meeting of the top management team and uses the information that the organisation? systems have derived. It is a useful forum to review and revise quality objectives.
What are internal audits and why do I need to carry them out?Internal audit is one of the key monitoring processes required by the standard and functions as a check on the organisation? systems. It is the opportunity for an organisation to determine compliance to the systems it has established and maintained to meet the needs of its customers and identify opportunities for improvement. Internal audit can be seen as a ealth check?for an organisation.
The ore?of ISO 9001:2008, Product realisationClause 7 of ISO 9001:2008 contains the core processes that most organisations carry out. Any clause or sub-clause in section 7 can be excluded from an organisations quality management system if it can be justifiably excluded. Examples of common exclusions are clause 7.3 design and development, clause 7.5.3 traceability and clause 7.6 the control of monitoring and measuring devices. Clauses can only be excluded if their exclusion does not affect the company? ability to provide a product or service that meets customer requirements.
These core processes should be managed and controlled via the quality management system, and are evaluated for effectiveness and suitability by the internal audits with feed back into the management review.
This is a clear demonstration of one of the key principles of ISO 9001:2008, continuous improvement by critical self-evaluation. The output from the self-evaluation is fed into a planning stage to determine actions needed to improve the system. Following the planning and consultation comes the action phase where the proposed changes are implemented. Then the cycle starts again by checking that the changes are effective and meaningful by self-evaluation.
Other requirements of section 7 are;Product planning to ascertain and then implement the necessary controls and resources to ensure product realisation.
Purchasing control to verify purchased product against comprehensive purchasing information and the selection and evaluation of suppliers.
Production and service provision to ensure that this activity is carried out in controlled conditions and that any processes that cannot be verified during production are validated to ensure capability. Where appropriate the product must be identified, and if required, traceable at all stages of production. Any customer property must be identified and protected from harm and all products must be stored and handled in such a way to preserve product conformity.
Any monitoring and measuring devices needed to provide evidence of product conformity must be identified and if necessary calibrated.
But what about the customer? All of the clauses in ISO 9001:2008 are in some way focused towards meeting and exceeding the customer? expectations. For example the requirement of management to determine and communicate the importance of customer requirements throughout the organisation, and the review of customer orders to ensure that they can be met. Companies are required to implement methods for effective communication with the client at all stages of the business including ascertaining customer satisfaction after the product or service has been delivered as well as resolving customer complaints.
Finally?ISO 9001:2008 is widely acclaimed as being the pre-eminent specification for quality management systems, it requires a company to look at itself and ask the question, ‘how can we improve?’ An ISO 9001:2008 management system should be an essential part of any business process, requiring continual improvement by self-evaluation with a goal of ensuring that current and future customer expectation can be met and exceeded.
If you have any queries concerning ISO 9001:2008 please visit http://www.iso-consults.com/

REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 14001

2009-09-30T06:37:00.004-07:00

REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 14001In order to effectively implement and benefit from an ISO 14001 EMS, it is important tohave an understanding of the standard’s requirements. A quick review of the standardshows that it is structured following the Plan, Do, Check, Improve philosophy of theTotal Quality Management movement, as follows:
PLAN4.2 Policy4.3 Planning
DO4.4 Implementation and Operation
CHECK4.5 Checking and Corrective Action
IMPROVE4.6 Management Review
Within these five elements are 17 sub-elements stating the various requirements.
4.2 Policy
4.3 Planning4.3.1 Environmental Aspects4.3.2 Legal and Other Requirements4.3.3 Objectives and Targets4.4.4 Environmental Management Programs
4.4 Implementation and Operation4.4.1 Structure and Responsibility4.4.2 Training Awareness and Competence4.4.3 Communications4.4.4 EMS Documentation4.4.5 Document Control4.4.6 Operation Control4.4.7 Emergency Planning and Response
4.5 Checking and Corrective Action4.5.1 Monitoring and Measurement4.5.2 Nonconformance, Corrective, and Preventive Action4.5.3 Records4.5.4 EMS Audit
4.6 Management Review
Within these 17 sub-elements are all of the requirements, or “shalls”, necessary toconform to ISO 14001. There is no substitute for reading the standard in terms ofrecognizing the requirements. As a matter of fact, no auditor should embark on an auditwithout having easily available the criteria to which they are doing the audit. However,below we briefly summarize the key points of the sub-elements. This summary is notintended to be a replacement for ISO 14001, and should not be used exclusively as suchduring an audit.
Detailed Section by Section Summary4.2 PolicyISO 14001 requires that the organization have a policy statement to drive the EMS.These tend to be short, one page or less documents, and simply affirm the commitments.There is no expectation that specific details be noted in the policy. For example, thecommitment to pollution prevention can simply be stated saying, “we are committed toprevention of pollution”. The policy must be clearly endorsed by top management andbe available to the public and employees. Although the availability to the public can berather passive; i.e. “is here if they want it”, there is an expectation that the employeeawareness is more proactive. Section 4.2 of ISO 14001 lists the other requirements of thepolicy.
4.3.1 Environmental AspectsThis element requires a procedure that not only identifies the aspects and impacts, butalso provides for determination of significance, and keeping the information up to date.ISO 14001 does not prescribe what aspects should be significant, or even how todetermine significance. However, it is expected the organization will develop aconsistent and verifiable process to do so.
4.3.2 Legal and Other RequirementsThis is a requirement for a procedure that explains how the organization obtainsinformation regarding its legal and other requirements, and makes that informationknown to key functions. This is not the assessment or compliance audit requirement, butrather a more up front determination of requirements.
4.3.3 Objectives and TargetsThere is no requirement for a procedure in this element, only that objectives and targetsbe documented. It does require that certain items be considered in developing theobjectives, such as legal requirements and prevention of pollution. It is sometimeseasiest to develop a procedure anyway for this element to be able to verify theseconsiderations were made.
4.3.4 Environmental Management Programs (EMP)EMPs are the detailed plans and programs explaining how the objectives and targets willbe accomplished. These EMPs usually note responsible personnel, milestones and dates,and measurements of success. Noting monitoring and measurement parameters directlyin the EMP facilitates conforming to 4.5.1 on Monitoring and Measurement discussedbelow.
4.4.1 Structure and ResponsibilityISO 14001 requires that the relevant management and accountability structure be definedin this element. This usually takes the form of an organizational chart. Also, theorganization must denote the Management Representative who is responsible to overseethe EMS and report to management on its operation.
4.4.2 Training Awareness and CompetenceThe key point in this element is that personnel must receive applicable training regardingthe EMS. Specific requirements are itemized in ISO 14001, and include general,company-wide items such as knowing the policy, to more function-specific training onaspects and emergency response. An organization usually responds to this element with atraining matrix, cross-referencing to training materials and records.
4.4.3 CommunicationsProcedures are required for both internal and external communications. Note that ISO14001 only requires procedures, and allows the organization to decide for itself thedegree of openness and disclosure of information. Whatever the decision in terms ofdisclosure, that decision process must be recorded.
4.4.4 EMS DocumentationThis requirement is simply that the organization has documented the system in eitherelectronic or paper form such that it addresses the elements of the standard and providesdirection to related documentation. Not all ISO 14001-required procedures need to bedocumented, as long as the system requirements can be verified.
4.4.5 Document Control.Procedures are required to control documents, such as system procedures and workinstructions, and to ensure that current versions are distributed and obsolete versions areremoved from the system.
4.4.6 Operational ControlThis element is the one which connects the EMS with the organization as a whole. Here,the critical functions related to significant aspects and objectives and targets are identifiedand procedures and work instructions created to ensure proper execution of activities.Requirements for communicating applicable system requirements to contractors are alsoaddressed.
4.4.7 Emergency Planning and ResponseAlthough typically addressed through conventional emergency response plans, thiselement also requires that a process exist for identifying the potential emergencies, inaddition to planning and mitigating them. A linkage to the aspects analysis, whereimpacts are assessed, is appropriate. Emergency incidents include those that may not beregulated, but may still cause significant impact as defined by the organization.
4.5.1 Monitoring and MeasurementProcedures are required describing how the organization will monitor and measure keyparameters of operations. These parameters relate to the significant aspects, objectivesand targets and legal and regulatory compliance. In order to properly manage the system,measurements must be taken of its performance to provide data for action. Responses tothis element usually cross reference to many other specific procedures and workinstructions describing measurement and equipment calibration. It is in this element thatwe find the requirement for what is commonly referred to as a compliance audit.
4.5.2 Nonconformance, Corrective, and Preventive ActionThis element requires procedures for acting on Non-conformances identified in the system,including corrective and preventive action. Non-conformances may be identified throughaudits, monitoring and measurement, and communications. The intent is to correct thesystem flaws. Typically, Corrective Action Report (CAR) forms are the norm, noting thenonconformance, the suggested fix, and closure of the action when completed. Note thatthis requirement does not imply in any way that the party identifying the nonconformancemust be the one to suggest the fix. Instead, it is expected that the system provide for theinformation to be routed to the most appropriate party to address the concern.
4.5.3 RecordsRecords are expected to exist to serve as verification of the system operating. Forexample, records include audit reports and training records. Unlike controlleddocuments, records are “once and done” documents, resulting from the execution of someprocess or procedure. Procedures in this element are required for the maintenance ofrecords.
4.5.4 EMS AuditsISO 14001 requires that the system provide for internal audits. This procedures(s) willinclude methodologies, schedules, and processes to conduct the audits. Interestingly, theEMS audit will in essence, audit the audit process itself!
4.6 Management ReviewThis element requires that periodically, top management will review the EMS to ensure itis operating as planned. If not, resources must be provided for corrective action. Forareas where there are no problems, the expectation is that with time, management willprovide for improvement programs. Usually there is no detailed procedure for thiselement, although records of agendas, attendance, and agreed upon action items aremaintained as verification.

Structure Of ISO 9001

2009-09-30T06:37:00.003-07:00

ISO 9001 was first published in 1987. Later, it went through three revisions in 1994, 2000 and 2008. The latest version version of the ISO 9001 standard was published on 14th November 2008. This is the structure of the standard:
Clause 1 Scope
Clause 2 Normative reference
Clause 3 Terms and definitions
Clause 4 Quality management system
Clause 5 Management responsibility
Clause 6 Resource management
Clause 7 Product realization
Clause 8 Measurement, analysis and improvement
http://www.e-wia.com

ISO 9001:2008 General Requirements

2009-09-30T06:37:00.001-07:00

4.1 General requirements
The organization shall establish, document, implement and maintain a quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness in accordance with the requirements of this International Standards. The organization
shall determine the processes needed for the quality management system and their application throughout the organizations,
determine the sequence and interaction of these processes,
determine criteria and methods needed to ensure that both the operation and control of these processes are effective,
ensure the availability of resources and information necessary to support the operation and monitoring of these processes,
monitor, measure (where applicable) and analyze these processes, and
implement actions necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of these processes.
These processes shall be managed by the organization in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard.
Where an organization chooses to outsource any process that affects product conformity to requirements, the organization shall ensure control over such processes. The type and extent of control to be applied to these outsourced processes shall be defined within the quality management system.
NOTE 1: Processes needed for the quality management system referred to above include processes for management activities, provision of resources, product realization and measurement, analysis and improvement.
NOTE 2: An outsourced process is identified as one being needed for the organization’s quality management system, but chosen to be performed by a party external to the organization.
NOTE 3: Ensuring control over outsourced processes does not absolve the organization of the responsibility of conformity to all customer, statutory, and regulatory requirements. The type and extent of control to be applied to the outsourced process can be influenced by factors such asa) the potential impact of the outsourced process on the organization’s capability to provide product that conforms to requirements,b) the degree to which the control for the process is shared;c) the capability of achieving the necessary control through the application of clause 7.4.
Clause 4.2 Documentation requirements
4.2.1 General
The quality management system documentation shall includedocumented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,
a quality manual,
documented procedures and records required by this International Standard,
documents including records, needed determined by the organization to be necessary to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes
NOTE 1: Where the term “documented procedure” appears within this International Standard, this means that the procedure is established, documented, implemented and maintained. A single document may include the requirements for one or more procedures. A requirement for a documented procedure may be covered by more than one document.
NOTE 2: The extent of the quality management system documentation can differ from one organization to another due to the size of organization and type of activities, the complexity of processes and their interactions, and the competence of personnel.
NOTE 3: The documentation can be in any form or type of medium.
4.2.2 Quality Manual
The organization shall establish and maintain a quality manual that includes the scope of the quality management system, including details of and justification for any exclusions (see 1.2), the documented procedures established for the quality management system, or reference to them, and a description of the interaction between the processes of the quality management.
4.2.3 Control of documents
Documents required by the quality management system shall be controlled. Records are a special type of document and shall be controlled according to the requirements given in 4.2.4.
A documented procedure shall be established to define the controls needed
to approve documents for adequacy prior to issue,
to review and update as necessary and re-approve documents,
to ensure that the changes and the current revision status of documents are identified,
to ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are available at points of use,
to ensure that documents of external origin are identified and their distribution controlled, and
to prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents, and to apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any purpose.
4.2.4 Control of records
Records established to provide evidence of conformity to requirements and of the effective operation of the quality management system shall be controlled. The organization shall establish a documented procedure to define the controls needed for the identification, storage, protection, retrieval, retention, and disposition of records. Records shall remain legible, readily identifiable, and retrievable.

ISO 9001 Management Representative

2009-09-30T06:36:00.002-07:00

The ISO 9001 Management Representative is appointed by the top management of an organization. Irrespective of other responsibilities, he/she is responsible and has the authority in
ensuring that processes needed for the quality management system are established, implemented and maintained,
reporting to top management on the performance of the quality management system and any need for improvement, and
ensuring the promotion of awareness of customer requirements throughout the organization.
The responsibility of the Management Representative also includes liaison with external parties on matters relating to the quality management system.
The Management Representative is usually assisted at the departmental level by Quality Representatives. This position is assumed by the respective Department Managers. The Quality Representatives are responsible for the quality processes which are applicable to their respective departments.
The Quality Representatives head their respective Quality Improvement Teams which are established for the purpose of monitoring processes and identifying opportunities for improvements. Members of the Quality Improvement Teams comprise of key personnel within the departments/process areas who are appointed by the Quality Representative to assist him/her at the process-level.
The Management Representative is also assisted by an appointed Document Controller whose responsibility is to implement the Control of Documents and Control of records procedures.
Collectively, the Management Representative, Quality Representatives and the Document Controller make up the Quality Management System Committee. This committee meets regularly to provide relevant inputs and resolutions for the quality management system. The structure of the Quality Management System Committee is as follows:
Management Representative – Chairman
Document Controller – Secretary
Quality Representatives – Members
[Note: The above is just an example. If you are a small organization, a QMS Committee and Quality Improvement Teams may not be necessary]
To facilitate effecetive communications, the Quality Management System Committee and the Quality Improvement Teams, respectively, meet regularly in order to ensure that communication regarding the effectiveness of the quality management system takes place. Pertinent information regarding the quality management system is then posted by the Management Representative on the Bulletin Board for the benefit of all employees. Employees are generally encouraged to provide their inputs towards the quality management system through suggestion boxes which are located at strategic locations within the organization’s premises.
Note: Some organizations employ this method but results may vary among other organizations. The key is to continually improve on these methods/processes.

ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 Information Site

2009-09-30T06:36:00.001-07:00

ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 Forum

2009-09-30T06:35:00.002-07:00

Introduction to ISO Certification

2009-09-30T06:35:00.001-07:00

Certification is a way to attest, by the intermediary of a third-party certifier, to a company’s ability to provide a service, product or system in accordance with client requirements and regulation requirements. ISO and IEC give the following definition:
Procedure by which a third party gives written assurancethat a product, process or service complies with the requirementsspecified in a benchmark.The ISO 9000 family of standards corresponds to all the management best practices benchmarks as regards quality, which are defined by ISO (the International Organisation for Standardization).
ISO 9000 standards were originally written in 1987, with revisions taking place in 1994 and 2000. Thus, the 2000 version of the ISO 9001 standard, which is part of the ISO 9000 family, is written “ISO 9001:2000″. The ISO 9001:2000 standard mainly focuses on the processes used to produce a service or product, whereas the ISO 9001:1994 standard was mainly focused on the product itself. Here is an overview of all the different standards in the ISO 9000 family:
ISO 9000: “Quality Management Systems – Basic Principles and Vocabulary”. The ISO 9000 standard describes the principles of a quality management system and defines the terminologyISO 9001: “Quality Management Systems – Requirements”. The ISO 9001 standard describes the requirements relative to a quality management system either for internal use or for contractual or certification purposes. Therefore, this standard is a group of requirements that companies must followISO 9004: “Quality Management Systems – Guidelines for Improving Performance”. This standard, which is intended for internal use and not for contractual purposes, focuses particularly on continually improving performanceISO 10011: “Guidelines for auditing quality management and/or environmental management systems”.

ISO 14001 And The Environment

2009-09-23T06:46:00.000-07:00

The ISO 14000 family of International Standards on environmental management is a relative newcomer to ISO’s portfolio – but enviroment-related standardization is far from being a new departure for ISO.
In fact, ISO has two-pronged approach to meeting the needs of business, industry, governments, non-governmental organizations and consumers in the field of the environment.
On the one hand, it offers a wideranging portfolio of standardized sampling, testing and analytical methods to deal with specific environmental challenges. It has developed more than 350 International Standards (out of a total morethan 12000) for the monitoring of such aspects as the quality of air, water and soil. These standards are means of providing business and government with scientifically valid data on the environmental effects of economic activity.
They also serve in a number of countries as the technical basis for environmental regulations.
ISO is leading a strategic approach by developing environmental management system standards that can be implemented in any type of organization in either public or private sectors (companies, administration, public utilities). To spearhead this strategic approach, ISO establish a new technical commitee, ISO /TC 207, Environmental management, in
1993. This followed ISO’s successful pioneering experience in management system standardization with the ISO 9000 series for quality management.
ISO’s direct involvement in environmental management stemmed from an intensive consultation process, carried out within the framework of a Strategic Advisory Group on Environment (SAGE),set up in 1991, in which 20 countrie, 11 international organizations and more than 100 environmental experts participated in defining the basic requirements of a new approach to environment-related standards.
This pioneering work was consolidated with ISO’s commitment to support the objective of “sustainable development” dicussed at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
Today, delegations of business and government experts from 55 countries have participate actively within TC 207,
and another 16 countries have observer status. These delegations are chosen by the national standars institute concerned and they are required to bring to TC 207 a national consensus on issue being addressed by the commitee.
This national consensus is derived from a process of consultation with interested parties.
From its beginning, it was recognized that ISO/TC 207 should have close cooperation with ISO/TC 176, Quality management and quality assurance, in the areas of management systems, auditing and related terminology. Active efforts are under way to ensure compatibility of ISO environmental management and quality management standards, for the benefit of all organizations wishing to implement them.