Changes in titles
The titles have changed – moving away from models to requirements andguidance.
Changes in scope
The scope of the standard has changed from those activities that impact theproduct to embrace all activities
in an organization that serve the satisfaction of customers. This leaves little if any activity of an organization that would be
outside the scope of the quality management system.
Changes in structure
By far the most significant change is the change in structure – away from 20elements to a model based on five elements.
The ISO 9000:2000 family of standard is based on a process model.
Changes in content
The content has changed from 20 elements organized on the basis of whatcould go wrong to four groups of requirements
that focus on elements of process management. It is however, not the fact that the original elements have
been placed onto a new structure, but that the principles upon which the standard has been based have changed.
Changes in intent
The intent of ISO 9001 has changed from a model for quality assurance to a setof requirements for an effective quality
management. The standard is now based on eight management principles not on what requirements were
necessary to prevent failures that experience had shown led to poor product quality.
The forgotten standard ISO 8402 is brought into the family of ISO 9000 thus making it more likely that people will use it.
However, in the author ’s opinion, all three standards should have been merged into one standard thus
ensuring that everyone who possessed the requirements also possessed the concepts, terminology and
guidelines to refer to as necessary.
Much damage can be done when the requirements of ISO 9000 are taken out
of context, taken in isolation and taken literally. ISO 9000 is not a productstandard therefore it is subject to
interpretation as appropriate to the conditions
in which it is being used. Whatever the initial understanding of a requirement
of ISO 9001 might be, the intent is that:
organizations design and manage their processes effectively to achievecorporate objectives, not that they create functional
silos that compete for resources.
organizations choose the right things to do based on an objective analysis of
the environment in which they operate, not slavishly follow procedures that
serve no practical purpose.
management create an environment in which people will be motivated, not
create bureaucratic systems of documentation that stifle initiative and
creativity.
Changes in language
The language in ISO 9000 has changed to reflect pressure from the usercommunity for a user-friendlier standard.
In some cases the changes are insignificant but in others the changes have a wider impact as indicated
below:
Subcontractor has changed to supplier and supplier changed to organizationso that there is now a supply
chain represented by customer – organization – supplier.
In ISO 9001 the term customer is used but in ISO 9004 the term, interested party
is used in order to embrace customers, employees, investors and otherparties.
Executive management has been changed to Top Management indicating thatwhen the standard uses
the term management responsibility it is the people who direct the organization that should address
these requirements.
Specified requirements have changed to customer and regulatory require-ments or product requirements
depending on the context.
Procedures have not exactly been changed to processes but presented in adifferent way that makes
procedures only one element of managing an effective process. Procedures have lost their dominance in
the standard to be replaced by the concept of managed processes.
Changes in requirement
ISO 9001 still contains 136 ‘shall’ statements, 2 less than the 1994 version so insome respects it is no different.
There were roughly 323 requirements in ISO 9001:1994 (Hoyle, David, 1996)6 . In ISO 9001:2000 there are roughly 250
requirements. This is still too many especially if we are trying to get across the
fundamental requirements of the standard. The following summarizes the
requirement of ISO 9001 at two levels: firstly as a single requirement, secondly
as a series of generic requirements.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Environmental Aspects (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.3.1)
The requirement of ?4.3.1 of ISO 14001 is to establish and maintain procedures 1) for identifying the environmental aspects of the organization’s activities, products, and services that it can control and those that it can influence and 2) for determining which of those aspects have or can have a significant impact on the environment. Understanding the requirement of this element of ISO 14001 is central to understanding the concept of an environmental management system.
1 .A single manufacturing facility has potentially hundreds of environmental aspects. How far must it go in identifying its environmental aspects to satisfy the terms of the requirement? ISO 14001 specifies that the organization is to identify those aspects that it can control and those that it can influence and that it must also take into account planned or new developments and new or modified activities, products, and services. These stipulations in the requirements, without actually drawing boundaries on how far the organization must go in identifying environmental aspects, at least establish some categories of aspect that must be considered. Beyond this principle, each organization must identify its aspects comprehensively enough so as to not fail to identify a significant aspect or a legal requirement. An objection to comprehensive identification of aspects is that the organization may become so immersed in aspects identification that it loses sight of the end objective of the procedure, which is to determine significance.
2. Significant impact is not a stand-alone term in ?4.3.1.
It is accompanied by the phrase impact on the environment_ and environment_ is a defined term (see definition of environment, ?3.5). Significant aspects, then, are those environmental aspects that have or can have significant impacts on air, water, land, natural resources, flora, fauna, and humans. The organization determines, using its own criteria, what magnitude of impact on these seven environmental receptors constitutes a significant impact. Whether an aspect is regulated is not intended to be a factor in determining significance.
3. Proper execution of the environmental aspects procedure is important, in part, because it lifts environmental management out of the regulatory compliance mode and into the mode of systematically identifying environmental aspects and impacts and considering their consequences for the environment, irrespective of regulation. The organization that rigorously applies the environmental aspects procedure discovers many opportunities to improve environmental performance that regulation does not address, including:
• Use of energy
• Consumption of materials
• Environmental impacts of employee activities
•Environmental impacts of products and by-products post-manufacture, including distribution, use, reuse, and disposal
• Environmental impacts of services
• Unregulated waste streams such as carbon dioxide
Aspects vs. Impacts – Environmental aspects and environmental impacts differ by definition from one another in that an aspect is an element of an organization’s activities, products or services that can interact (emphasis added) with the environment_ while an impact is any change (emphasis added) to the environment_ resulting from an organization’s environmental aspects._ An aspect, then, is a precursor to an impact and an impact occurs when the aspect interacts with and changes the environment.
When identifying its aspects and impacts, the organization may find that there are more than one potential impacts associated with any given aspect. For example, an environmental aspect of a coal-fired power generation facility is stack emissions containing sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon. These emissions change the environment and become impacts by contaminating plants, soil, and surface waters; contributing to the formation of ground-level ozone; causing or exacerbating heart and lung disease in humans; entering the aquatic food chain and impairing reproductive, immune, and endocrine systems; and contributing to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide leading to global warming. One aspect, stack emissions, then can generate at least five impacts.
Other organizations, applying benefit/cost analyses to their corrective actions, may discover that creation of a beneficial impact provides a greater environmental benefit than elimination of an adverse impact.
The introduction of the beneficial environmental impact concept into the ISO 14001 Terms and Definitions suggests that it was considered by some of the ISO 14001:1996 drafters as a placeholder for the future possibility of offsetting adverse impacts with beneficial and, on balance, achieving an environmentally neutral organization.
Control and Influence – The environmental aspects procedure requires the organization to identify those environmental aspects that it can control and those that it can influence._ Circumstances where control and influence are considered separately can occur where the environmental aspects of products or services are concerned. Some examples illustrate the case:
1. No control, no influence – When an organization manufactures a product, such as lumber, and sells it to a customer that can use the product in any way that it wishes, the organization has no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The customer could use the product benignly as in the manufacture of a table or to damage the environment by burning the lumber and releasing its carbon into the atmosphere. In this case, the organization would not be expected to have either control or influence over the environmental aspects of the product.
2. Control, no influence – When an organization’s environmental aspect is the use of electric power generated from coal, it may be able to control its use of electric power by using less, by buying from a different, less environmentally damaging source, or by generating its own power. Rarely, however, does the organization have influence over the power generator to an extent that it could influence it to reduce the environmental impacts of power production.
3. Influence, no control – When an organization manufactures a product, such as an automobile, which is sold to the customer without restrictions on its use, the organization may be said to have no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The organization may, however, be able to assert influence with the inclusion of owner’s manuals containing instructions for low impact use of the product.
4. Control and influence – When an organization buys a product built to its specifications, it has control over the products’ environmental aspects in the sense that it can determine the environmental aspects of the product. In this case, control also includes influence.
Significant Impacts – ISO 14001 does not provide guidance as to what constitutes a significant impact on the environment_, leaving that determination to the organization.
Many organizations ignore the qualifying phrase, impact on the environment_, and add additional criteria to what they determine to be significant impacts. For example, many organizations decide that aspects that are the subject of regulation, irrespective of impact to the environment, or that can cause damage to business reputation, are significant. Legal requirements, however, are identified in ?4.3.2 and legal requirements and business requirements are specifically considered when the organization establishes its objectives and targets (?4.3.3). Adding criteria that are not relevant to impact on the environment in the determination of significance distorts the outcome of procedures for environmental aspects and objectives and targets by giving these criteria undue weight in the determination of significance. For example, an environmental aspect that is significant only because its disclosure might affect the organization’s reputation is best dealt with in the Public Relations Department rather than as an environmental aspect.
Determination of significance is a yes or no question, not a determination of relative value. It is possible, therefore, that the execution of the environmental aspects procedure will result in the determination that the organization has no significant aspects. While the organization may elect to rank its aspects from most significant to least significant, that does not necessarily mean that any rise to the level of significant impact on the environment.
Where the impact occurs can be material to determination of significance. For example, a coal-fired power plant’s air emissions can interact with the environment; these emissions are clearly environmental aspects. Whether they significantly impact the environment may depend upon where the interaction with the environment occurs.
Part of the importance of establishing significance lies in the fact that the potentially significant environmental impacts become a focus of Objectives and Targets (?4.3.3), Competence (?4.4.2), Operational Controls (?4.4.6), and Monitoring and Measurement (?4.5.1) requirements.
An organization that determines that aspects are significant because of regulation or business reputation increases the amount of work it must do in these areas.
ISO 14001 does not require the organization to establish objectives and targets for each significant environmental aspect. On the one hand, the absence of a requirement to set objectives and targets for all significant aspects gives organizations latitude to conform to the requirements of ISO 14001 while not presently dealing, for example, with the significant environmental aspects of products. On the other, a requirement to establish objectives and targets for all identified significant aspects could easily overwhelm an organization having many significant aspects. Without this latitude, organizations might choose to ignore the existence of significant aspects that they believe are insurmountable or even decide not to implement ISO 14001. As it is, many organizations choose to deny the existence of significant aspects about which they feel they can do nothing.
1 .A single manufacturing facility has potentially hundreds of environmental aspects. How far must it go in identifying its environmental aspects to satisfy the terms of the requirement? ISO 14001 specifies that the organization is to identify those aspects that it can control and those that it can influence and that it must also take into account planned or new developments and new or modified activities, products, and services. These stipulations in the requirements, without actually drawing boundaries on how far the organization must go in identifying environmental aspects, at least establish some categories of aspect that must be considered. Beyond this principle, each organization must identify its aspects comprehensively enough so as to not fail to identify a significant aspect or a legal requirement. An objection to comprehensive identification of aspects is that the organization may become so immersed in aspects identification that it loses sight of the end objective of the procedure, which is to determine significance.
2. Significant impact is not a stand-alone term in ?4.3.1.
It is accompanied by the phrase impact on the environment_ and environment_ is a defined term (see definition of environment, ?3.5). Significant aspects, then, are those environmental aspects that have or can have significant impacts on air, water, land, natural resources, flora, fauna, and humans. The organization determines, using its own criteria, what magnitude of impact on these seven environmental receptors constitutes a significant impact. Whether an aspect is regulated is not intended to be a factor in determining significance.
3. Proper execution of the environmental aspects procedure is important, in part, because it lifts environmental management out of the regulatory compliance mode and into the mode of systematically identifying environmental aspects and impacts and considering their consequences for the environment, irrespective of regulation. The organization that rigorously applies the environmental aspects procedure discovers many opportunities to improve environmental performance that regulation does not address, including:
• Use of energy
• Consumption of materials
• Environmental impacts of employee activities
•Environmental impacts of products and by-products post-manufacture, including distribution, use, reuse, and disposal
• Environmental impacts of services
• Unregulated waste streams such as carbon dioxide
Aspects vs. Impacts – Environmental aspects and environmental impacts differ by definition from one another in that an aspect is an element of an organization’s activities, products or services that can interact (emphasis added) with the environment_ while an impact is any change (emphasis added) to the environment_ resulting from an organization’s environmental aspects._ An aspect, then, is a precursor to an impact and an impact occurs when the aspect interacts with and changes the environment.
When identifying its aspects and impacts, the organization may find that there are more than one potential impacts associated with any given aspect. For example, an environmental aspect of a coal-fired power generation facility is stack emissions containing sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and carbon. These emissions change the environment and become impacts by contaminating plants, soil, and surface waters; contributing to the formation of ground-level ozone; causing or exacerbating heart and lung disease in humans; entering the aquatic food chain and impairing reproductive, immune, and endocrine systems; and contributing to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide leading to global warming. One aspect, stack emissions, then can generate at least five impacts.
Other organizations, applying benefit/cost analyses to their corrective actions, may discover that creation of a beneficial impact provides a greater environmental benefit than elimination of an adverse impact.
The introduction of the beneficial environmental impact concept into the ISO 14001 Terms and Definitions suggests that it was considered by some of the ISO 14001:1996 drafters as a placeholder for the future possibility of offsetting adverse impacts with beneficial and, on balance, achieving an environmentally neutral organization.
Control and Influence – The environmental aspects procedure requires the organization to identify those environmental aspects that it can control and those that it can influence._ Circumstances where control and influence are considered separately can occur where the environmental aspects of products or services are concerned. Some examples illustrate the case:
1. No control, no influence – When an organization manufactures a product, such as lumber, and sells it to a customer that can use the product in any way that it wishes, the organization has no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The customer could use the product benignly as in the manufacture of a table or to damage the environment by burning the lumber and releasing its carbon into the atmosphere. In this case, the organization would not be expected to have either control or influence over the environmental aspects of the product.
2. Control, no influence – When an organization’s environmental aspect is the use of electric power generated from coal, it may be able to control its use of electric power by using less, by buying from a different, less environmentally damaging source, or by generating its own power. Rarely, however, does the organization have influence over the power generator to an extent that it could influence it to reduce the environmental impacts of power production.
3. Influence, no control – When an organization manufactures a product, such as an automobile, which is sold to the customer without restrictions on its use, the organization may be said to have no control over the environmental aspects of the product’s use. The organization may, however, be able to assert influence with the inclusion of owner’s manuals containing instructions for low impact use of the product.
4. Control and influence – When an organization buys a product built to its specifications, it has control over the products’ environmental aspects in the sense that it can determine the environmental aspects of the product. In this case, control also includes influence.
Significant Impacts – ISO 14001 does not provide guidance as to what constitutes a significant impact on the environment_, leaving that determination to the organization.
Many organizations ignore the qualifying phrase, impact on the environment_, and add additional criteria to what they determine to be significant impacts. For example, many organizations decide that aspects that are the subject of regulation, irrespective of impact to the environment, or that can cause damage to business reputation, are significant. Legal requirements, however, are identified in ?4.3.2 and legal requirements and business requirements are specifically considered when the organization establishes its objectives and targets (?4.3.3). Adding criteria that are not relevant to impact on the environment in the determination of significance distorts the outcome of procedures for environmental aspects and objectives and targets by giving these criteria undue weight in the determination of significance. For example, an environmental aspect that is significant only because its disclosure might affect the organization’s reputation is best dealt with in the Public Relations Department rather than as an environmental aspect.
Determination of significance is a yes or no question, not a determination of relative value. It is possible, therefore, that the execution of the environmental aspects procedure will result in the determination that the organization has no significant aspects. While the organization may elect to rank its aspects from most significant to least significant, that does not necessarily mean that any rise to the level of significant impact on the environment.
Where the impact occurs can be material to determination of significance. For example, a coal-fired power plant’s air emissions can interact with the environment; these emissions are clearly environmental aspects. Whether they significantly impact the environment may depend upon where the interaction with the environment occurs.
Part of the importance of establishing significance lies in the fact that the potentially significant environmental impacts become a focus of Objectives and Targets (?4.3.3), Competence (?4.4.2), Operational Controls (?4.4.6), and Monitoring and Measurement (?4.5.1) requirements.
An organization that determines that aspects are significant because of regulation or business reputation increases the amount of work it must do in these areas.
ISO 14001 does not require the organization to establish objectives and targets for each significant environmental aspect. On the one hand, the absence of a requirement to set objectives and targets for all significant aspects gives organizations latitude to conform to the requirements of ISO 14001 while not presently dealing, for example, with the significant environmental aspects of products. On the other, a requirement to establish objectives and targets for all identified significant aspects could easily overwhelm an organization having many significant aspects. Without this latitude, organizations might choose to ignore the existence of significant aspects that they believe are insurmountable or even decide not to implement ISO 14001. As it is, many organizations choose to deny the existence of significant aspects about which they feel they can do nothing.
Key Elements of ISO 14001
The Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority; Legal and Other Requirements; Evaluation of Compliance; and Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Preventive Action elements of ISO 14001 are all essential to the ongoing effectiveness of the EMS. This section describes how they function within the overall scheme.
1. Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.4.1)
?4.4.1 of ISO 14001 establishes three important requirements:
1. That management ensure the availability of resources to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the EMS;
2. That roles, responsibilities, and authorities be defined, documented, and communicated in order to facilitate effective environmental management; and
3. That top management appoint a management representative(s) who, irrespective of other responsibilities, will have responsibility and authority for implementing and maintaining the EMS and for reporting to top management on the performance of the EMS.
Ensuring Availability of Resources – Provision of resources for the EMS is almost always an issue within organizations. Although top management usually understands and accepts, at least in principle, the requirement to provide resources, the level of management that makes decisions on capital deployment and operating budgets often does not subscribe to the same requirement. Making the case for resources typically requires the implementation team or management representative to quantify intangibles such as the avoided cost of regulatory fines or the value to the environment of reducing environmental impacts.
When considering the requirement to provide resources, especially financial resources, it may be important to recognize that ISO 14001 requires the provision of resources for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS, not necessarily resources to correct or prevent environmental impacts or to register to ISO 14001. When contemplating the cost of implementing ISO 14001, organizations, again, should think in terms of three separate cost categories:
1) Internal labor and external consultant costs to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the policy and procedural elements of ISO 14001;
2) Capital costs for correction or prevention of environmental impacts; and
3) Costs of registration to ISO 14001, if the organization elects to register.
Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities – In the past, some organizations have employed a practice of not delegating responsibility and authority for environmental affairs to specific management representatives, reasoning that if the responsibility was diffused throughout the organization, no one person could become personally accountable for non-compliance with regulations or for environmental liabilities. §4.4.1 of ISO 14001 limits such ‘willful ignorance’ by requiring top management of the organization to appoint “specific management representative(s)” to ensure that the EMS is implemented and that top management be apprised of EMS performance. It also requires that the delegation of responsibility and authority be documented and communicated, thus eliminating circumstances where responsibility and authority for the EMS are diffuse or uncertain.
When §4.4.1 is read together with the requirement of the Environmental Policy for a commitment to comply with applicable legal requirements, §4.3.2, Legal and Other
Requirements, requiring a procedure for identifying legal requirements (following), and §4.5.2, Evaluation of Compliance, requiring a procedure for evaluating regulatory compliance, it is evident that the management representative is also responsible for ensuring that the organization is in compliance with applicable regulations. While this responsibility and authority can be delegated, the chain of delegation begins with top management and is passed to the management representative, effectively eliminating any uncertainty as to who is responsible and authorized to ensure regulatory compliance.
EMS Organizational Structure – There is an almost universal norm for the management structure of the EMS organization under ISO 14001. It begins with the top management position, proceeds to the top manager’s leadership team, and then to an EMS implementation team that is generally chaired by the management representative. The departments making up the relevant functions and levels of the organization and environmental, safety, and health professionals comprise the typical implementation team.
Defining Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities for the EMS – In defining, documenting, and communicating EMS roles, responsibilities, and authorities, it makes sense to begin with top management and proceed through all of the positions having EMS responsibilities. Following is a generic example of how roles, responsibilities, and authorities might be documented and communicated in an EMS Procedures Manual:
Plant Manager
Authority: The Plant Manager has the authority, responsibility, and accountability for managing all aspects of ABC Company’s activities, products, and services at the Anytown facility.Source: Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, ABC Company, Inc.
EMS Responsibilities: Under the requirements of ISO 14001, the Plant Manager shall be specifically responsible for:
1) Defining the Environmental Policy;
2) Delegating authority and responsibility for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS;
3) Providing human, technological, infrastructure, and financial resources and specialized skills; and
4) Periodically reviewing the EMS for suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness and directing changes as necessary to achieve the goals for an EMS and the commitment to continual improvement.
Leadership Team
EMS Responsibilities: The Leadership Team shall advise the Plant Manager on the exercise by
the Plant Manager of his/her responsibilities for the EMS.
Management Representative, Implementation and Maintenance Responsibilities
EMS Authority: The Plant Manager delegates to the Manager, ______ _______, the authority
to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the Environmental Management System and to
ensure that it conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. In the context of ISO 14001, the
Manager, _____ _________, shall be the Management Representative.
1. Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority (ISO 14001:2004, ?4.4.1)
?4.4.1 of ISO 14001 establishes three important requirements:
1. That management ensure the availability of resources to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the EMS;
2. That roles, responsibilities, and authorities be defined, documented, and communicated in order to facilitate effective environmental management; and
3. That top management appoint a management representative(s) who, irrespective of other responsibilities, will have responsibility and authority for implementing and maintaining the EMS and for reporting to top management on the performance of the EMS.
Ensuring Availability of Resources – Provision of resources for the EMS is almost always an issue within organizations. Although top management usually understands and accepts, at least in principle, the requirement to provide resources, the level of management that makes decisions on capital deployment and operating budgets often does not subscribe to the same requirement. Making the case for resources typically requires the implementation team or management representative to quantify intangibles such as the avoided cost of regulatory fines or the value to the environment of reducing environmental impacts.
When considering the requirement to provide resources, especially financial resources, it may be important to recognize that ISO 14001 requires the provision of resources for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS, not necessarily resources to correct or prevent environmental impacts or to register to ISO 14001. When contemplating the cost of implementing ISO 14001, organizations, again, should think in terms of three separate cost categories:
1) Internal labor and external consultant costs to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the policy and procedural elements of ISO 14001;
2) Capital costs for correction or prevention of environmental impacts; and
3) Costs of registration to ISO 14001, if the organization elects to register.
Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities – In the past, some organizations have employed a practice of not delegating responsibility and authority for environmental affairs to specific management representatives, reasoning that if the responsibility was diffused throughout the organization, no one person could become personally accountable for non-compliance with regulations or for environmental liabilities. §4.4.1 of ISO 14001 limits such ‘willful ignorance’ by requiring top management of the organization to appoint “specific management representative(s)” to ensure that the EMS is implemented and that top management be apprised of EMS performance. It also requires that the delegation of responsibility and authority be documented and communicated, thus eliminating circumstances where responsibility and authority for the EMS are diffuse or uncertain.
When §4.4.1 is read together with the requirement of the Environmental Policy for a commitment to comply with applicable legal requirements, §4.3.2, Legal and Other
Requirements, requiring a procedure for identifying legal requirements (following), and §4.5.2, Evaluation of Compliance, requiring a procedure for evaluating regulatory compliance, it is evident that the management representative is also responsible for ensuring that the organization is in compliance with applicable regulations. While this responsibility and authority can be delegated, the chain of delegation begins with top management and is passed to the management representative, effectively eliminating any uncertainty as to who is responsible and authorized to ensure regulatory compliance.
EMS Organizational Structure – There is an almost universal norm for the management structure of the EMS organization under ISO 14001. It begins with the top management position, proceeds to the top manager’s leadership team, and then to an EMS implementation team that is generally chaired by the management representative. The departments making up the relevant functions and levels of the organization and environmental, safety, and health professionals comprise the typical implementation team.
Defining Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities for the EMS – In defining, documenting, and communicating EMS roles, responsibilities, and authorities, it makes sense to begin with top management and proceed through all of the positions having EMS responsibilities. Following is a generic example of how roles, responsibilities, and authorities might be documented and communicated in an EMS Procedures Manual:
Plant Manager
Authority: The Plant Manager has the authority, responsibility, and accountability for managing all aspects of ABC Company’s activities, products, and services at the Anytown facility.Source: Senior Vice President, Manufacturing, ABC Company, Inc.
EMS Responsibilities: Under the requirements of ISO 14001, the Plant Manager shall be specifically responsible for:
1) Defining the Environmental Policy;
2) Delegating authority and responsibility for the establishment, implementation, maintenance, and improvement of the EMS;
3) Providing human, technological, infrastructure, and financial resources and specialized skills; and
4) Periodically reviewing the EMS for suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness and directing changes as necessary to achieve the goals for an EMS and the commitment to continual improvement.
Leadership Team
EMS Responsibilities: The Leadership Team shall advise the Plant Manager on the exercise by
the Plant Manager of his/her responsibilities for the EMS.
Management Representative, Implementation and Maintenance Responsibilities
EMS Authority: The Plant Manager delegates to the Manager, ______ _______, the authority
to establish, implement, maintain, and improve the Environmental Management System and to
ensure that it conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. In the context of ISO 14001, the
Manager, _____ _________, shall be the Management Representative.
Environmental Management Programmes
ISO 14001 Section 4.3.4, Environmental Management Program(s), requires that organizations establish and maintain one or more environmental management programs for achieving their objectives. The environmental management program is a key element to the success of an EMS. Properly designed and implemented, environmental management programs should achieve the objectives and, consequently, improve your organization’s environmental performance.
According to ISO 14001 Section 4.3.4 the environmental management program must:
1. address each environmental objective and target
2. designate the personnel responsible for achieving targets at each relevant function and level of the
organization
3. provide an “action plan” describing how each environmental target will be achieved
4. establish a time-frame or a schedule for achieving each target.
An environmental management program is an action plan or a series of action plans to achieve an environmental objective.
According to ISO 14001 Section 4.3.4 the environmental management program must:
1. address each environmental objective and target
2. designate the personnel responsible for achieving targets at each relevant function and level of the
organization
3. provide an “action plan” describing how each environmental target will be achieved
4. establish a time-frame or a schedule for achieving each target.
An environmental management program is an action plan or a series of action plans to achieve an environmental objective.
EMS Documentation
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.4, EMS Documentation, requires that organizations “. . . establish and maintain information, in paper or electronic form, to: 1. describe the core elements of the management system and their interaction; 2. provide direction to related documentation.”
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.5, Document Control, requires that organizations establish and maintain procedures to control all documents required by ISO 14001. The purpose of these document control procedures is to ensure that organizations create and maintain documents sufficient to implementing an EMS.
The procedure must ensure that:
• EMS documents can be located
• EMS documents are legible, dated (with dates of revisions) and readily identifiable
• EMS documents are maintained in an orderly manner and retained for a specified period
• EMS documents are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary, and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel
• The current versions of relevant documents are available at all locations where they are necessary
• Obsolete documents are promptly removed from all distribution points
• Any obsolete documents retained for legal and/or knowledge preservation purposes must be identified as such.
ISO 14001 Section 4.3.5 also requires that organizations establish procedures and designate responsibilities and
authority regarding the creation and modification of EMS documents.
ISO 14001 Section 4.4.5, Document Control, requires that organizations establish and maintain procedures to control all documents required by ISO 14001. The purpose of these document control procedures is to ensure that organizations create and maintain documents sufficient to implementing an EMS.
The procedure must ensure that:
• EMS documents can be located
• EMS documents are legible, dated (with dates of revisions) and readily identifiable
• EMS documents are maintained in an orderly manner and retained for a specified period
• EMS documents are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary, and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel
• The current versions of relevant documents are available at all locations where they are necessary
• Obsolete documents are promptly removed from all distribution points
• Any obsolete documents retained for legal and/or knowledge preservation purposes must be identified as such.
ISO 14001 Section 4.3.5 also requires that organizations establish procedures and designate responsibilities and
authority regarding the creation and modification of EMS documents.
Implementing ISO 9000 Quality Management System
Implementation of ISO 9000 affects the entire organization right from the start. If pursued with total dedication, it results in ‘cultural transition’ to an atmosphere of continuous improvement.The process of implementing ISO 9000 depends on:???? The sophistication of your existing quality program,???? The size of your organization, and???? The complexity of your process.The 14 essential steps, briefly described below, are to be followed through in order to implement ISO 9000 quality management system successfully.Step 1: Top management commitmentStep 2: Establish implementation teamStep 3. Start ISO 9000 awareness programsStep 4: Provide TrainingStep 5. Conduct initial status surveyStep 6: Create a documented implementation planStep 7. Develop quality management system documentationStep 8: Document controlStep 9. ImplementationStep 10. Internal quality auditStep 11. Management reviewStep 12. Pre-assessment auditStep 13. Certification and registrationStep 14: Continual ImprovementStep 1: Top Management CommitmentThe top management (managing director or chief executive) should demonstrate a commitment and a determination to implement an ISO 9000 quality management system in the organization. Without top management commitment, no quality initiative can succeed. Top management must be convinced that registration and certification will enable the organization to demonstrate to its customers a visible commitment to quality. It should realize that a quality management system would improve overallbusiness efficiency by elimination of wasteful duplication in management system.The top management should provide evidence of its commitment to the development and implementation of the quality management system and continually improve its effectiveness by:a. Communicating to the organization the importance of meeting customer as well as statutory and regulatory requirements,b. Defining the organization’s quality policy and make this known to every employee,c. Ensuring that quality objectives are established at all levels and functions,d. Ensuring the availability of resources required for the development andimplementation of the quality management system,e. Appointing a management representative to coordinate quality management system activities, and Conducting management review.The top management should also consider actions such as:1. Leading the organization by example,2. Participating in improvement projects,3. Creating an environment that encourages the involvement of people.This type of top management commitment may be driven by:1. Direct marketplace pressure: requirements of crucial customers or parentconglomerates.2. Indirect marketplace pressure: increased quality levels and visibility among competitors.3. Growth ambitions: desire to exploit market opportunities.4. Personal belief in the value of quality as a goal and quality management systems as a means of reaching that goal.The top management should identify the goals to be achieved through the quality management system. Typical goals may be:• Be more efficient and profitable• Produce products and services that consistently meet customers’ needs andexpectations• Achieve customers satisfaction• Increase market share• Improve communications and morale in the organization• Reduce costs and liabilities• Increase confidence in the production systemStep 2. Establish Implementation TeamISO 9000 is implemented by people. The first phase of implementation calls for the commitment of top management – the CEO and perhaps a handful of other key people.The next step is to establish implementation team and appoint a ManagementRepresentative (MR) as its coordinator to plan and oversee implementation. Its members should include representatives of all functions of the organization -Marketing, Design and development, Planning, Production, Quality control, etc.In the context of the standard, the MR is the person within the Organization who acts as interface between organization management and the ISO 9000 registrar. His role is, in fact, much broader than that. The MR should also act as the organization’s “quality management system champion,” and must be a person with:
1. Total backing from the CEO,2. Genuine and passionate commitment to quality in general and the ISO 9000 qualitymanagement system in particular,3. The dignity – resulting from rank, seniority, or both – to influence managers and others of all levels and functions,4. Detailed knowledge of quality methods in general and ISO 9000 in particular.The members of the implementation team should also be trained on ISO 9000 quality management systems by a professional training organization.
Step 3. Start ISO 9000 Awareness ProgramsISO 9000 awareness programs should be conducted to communicate to theemployees the aim of the ISO 9000 quality management system; the advantage it offers to employees, customers and the organization; how it will work; and their roles and responsibilities within the system. Suppliers of materials and components should also participate in these programs.The awareness program should emphasize the benefits that the organization expects to realize through its ISO 9000 quality management system. The program should also stress the higher levels of participation and self-direction that the quality management system renders to employees. Such a focus will go far to enlist employee support and commitment.The programs could be run either by the implementation team or by experts hired to talk to different levels of employees.Step 4. Provide TrainingSince the ISO 9000 quality management system affects all the areas and all personnel in the organization, training programs should be structured for different categories of employees – senior managers, middle-level managers, supervisors and workers. The ISO 9000 implementation plan should make provision for this training. The training should cover the basic concepts of quality management systems and the standard and their overall impact on the strategic goals of the organization, the changed processes, and the likely work culture implications of the system. In addition, initial training mayalso be necessary on writing quality manuals, procedures and work instruction; auditing principles; techniques of laboratory management; calibration; testing procedures, etc.When in-house capacity to carry out such training is not available, it may be necessary to participate in external training courses run by professional training organizations.Alternatively, an external training institution could be invited to conduct in-house training courses.
Step 5. Conduct Initial Status SurveyISO 9000 does not require duplication of effort or redundant system. The goal of ISO 9000 is to create a quality management system that conforms to the standard. This does not preclude incorporating, adapting, and adding onto quality programs already in place. So the next step in the implementation process is to compare the organization’s existing quality management system, if there is one — with the requirements of thestandard (ISO 9001:2008).For this purpose, an organization flow chart showing how information actually flows (not what should be done) from order placement by the customer to delivery to this customer should be drawn up. From this over-all flow chart, a flow chart of activities in each department should be prepared.With the aid of the flow charts, a record of existing quality management system should be established. A significant number of written procedures may already be in place.Unless they are very much out of date, these documents should not be discarded.Rather, they should be incorporated into the new quality management system.Documents requiring modification or elaboration should be identified and listed. Thisexercise is some times referred to as ” gap analysis”. During these review processes,wide consultation with executives and representatives of various unions andassociations within the organization is required to enlist their active cooperation.In the review process, documents should be collected, studied and registered for further use, possibly after they have been revised. Before developing new quality management system documentation, you need to consider with which quality requirements or department you should start. The best is to select an area where processes are fairly well organized, running effectively and functioning satisfactorily.The basic approach is to determine and record how a process is currently carried out.We can do this by identifying the people involved and obtaining information from them during individual interviews. Unfortunately, it often happens that different people will give different, contradicting versions of a process. Each one may refer to oral instructions that are not accurate or clear. This is why the facts are often not described correctly the first time around, and have to be revised several times.Once it has been agreed how to describe the current process, this process has to be adapted, supplemented and implemented according to the requirements of the quality standard (ISO 9001:2008). This requires organizational arrangements, the drawing up of additional documents and possible removal of existing documentation (e.g. procedures, inspection/test plans, inspection/test instructions) and records (e.g.inspection/test reports, inspection/test certificates).In introducing a quality management system, the emphasis is on the improvement of the existing processes or the re-organization of processes.In general, the steps to follow are the following:Ascertain and establish the following:What is the present operation/process? What already exists?
Analyze the relevant sections of the quality standard – ISO 9001:2000:What is actually required? If necessary, supplement and change operational arrangements in accordance with the standard, develop documents and records, and describe operations/processes:What is the desired operation/process?Figure 1: Steps in introducing a quality management systemThe above gap analysis can be done internally, if the knowledge level is there. Or aformal pre-assessment can be obtained from any one of a large number of ISO 9000consulting, implementing, and registration firms.Step 6. Create a Documented Implementation PlanOnce the organization has obtained a clear picture of how its quality management system compares with the ISO 9001:2008 standard, all non-conformances must be addressed with a documented implementation plan. Usually, the plan calls for identifying and describing processes to make the organization’s quality management system fully in compliance with the standard.The implementation plan should be thorough and specific, detailing:???? Quality documentation to be developed???? Objective of the system???? Pertinent ISO 9001:2008 section???? Person or team responsible???? Approval required???? Training required???? Resources required???? Estimated completion dateThese elements should be organized into a detailed chart, to be reviewed andapproved. The plan should define the responsibilities of different departments and personnel and set target dates for the completion of activities. Once approved, the Management Representative should control, review and update the plan as the implementation process proceeds.Typical implementation action plan is shown in Figure 2. Use ISO 10005:1995 for guidance in quality planning
Step 7. Develop Quality Management System DocumentationDocumentation is the most common area of non-conformance among organizations wishing to implement ISO 9000 quality management systems. As one company pointed out: “When we started our implementation, we found that documentation was inadequate. Even absent, in some areas. Take calibration. Obviously it’s necessary, and obviously we do it, but it wasn’t being documented. Another area was inspection and testing. We inspect and test practically every item that leaves here, but our documentation was inadequate”.Documentation of the quality management system should include:???? Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,???? A quality manual,???? Documented procedures and records required by the standard ISO 9001:2008, and???? Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.Quality documentation is generally prepared in the three levels indicated in the box that follows. Use ISO 10013:1995 for guidance in quality documentation.
In small companies, the above levels of documentation could be presented in one manual; otherwise, separate manuals should be prepared.A list of the documents to be prepared should be drawn up and the responsibility for writing the documents should be assigned to the persons concerned in various functional departments. They should be advised to prepare the drafts within a specific time frame.Step 8: Document ControlOnce the necessary quality management system documentation has been generated, a documented system must be created to control it. Control is simply a means of managing the creation, approval, distribution, revision, storage, and disposal of the various types of documentation. Document control systems should be as simple and as easy to operate as possible — sufficient to meet ISO 9001:2008 requirements and that is all.Document control should include:???? Approval for adequacy by authorized person (s) before issue,???? Review, updating and re-approval of documents by authorized person (s),???? Identification of changes and of the revision status of documents,???? Availability of relevant versions of documents at points of use,???? Identification and control of documents of external origin,???? Assurance of legibility and identifability of documents, and???? Prevention of unintended use of obsolete documents.The principle of ISO 9000 document control is that employees should have access to the documentation and records needed to fulfil their responsibilities.Step 9. ImplementationIt is good practice to implement the quality management system being documented as the documentation is developed, although this may be more effective in larger firms. In smaller companies, the quality management system is often implemented all at once throughout the organization. Where phased implementation takes place, the effectiveness of the system in selected areas can be evaluated.It would be a good idea initially to evaluate areas where the chances of a positive evaluation are high, to maintain the confidence of both management and staff in the merits of implementing the quality management system.The implementation progress should be monitored to ensure that the qualitymanagement system is effective and conforms to the standard. These activities include internal quality audit, formal corrective action and management review.Step 10. Internal Quality AuditAs the system is being installed, its effectiveness should be checked by regular internal quality audits. Internal quality audits are conducted to verify that the installed quality management system:
???? Conform to the planned arrangements, to the requirements of the standard (ISO 9001:2008) and to the quality management system requirements established by your organization, and???? Is effectively implemented and maintained.Even after the system stabilizes and starts functioning, internal audits should be planned and performed as part of an ongoing strategy.A few staff members should be trained to carry out internal auditing. Use ISO 19011 for guidance in auditing, auditor qualification and programmes.Step 11. Management ReviewWhen the installed quality management system has been operating for three to six months, an internal audit and management review should be conducted and corrective actions implemented. The management reviews are conducted to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system.????The review should include assessing opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system, including the quality policy and quality objectives.The input to management review should include information on:???? Results of audits,???? Customer feed back,???? Process performance and product conformity,???? Status of preventive and corrective actions,???? Follow-up actions from previous management reviews,???? Changes that could affect the quality management system, and???? Recommendations for improvements.Management reviews should also address the pitfalls to effective implementation, including lack of CEO commitment, failure to involve everyone in the process, and failure to monitor progress and enforce deadlines.Step 12. Pre-assessment AuditWhen system deficiencies are no longer visible, it is normally time to apply for certification. However, before doing so, a pre-assessment audit should be arranged with an independent and qualified auditor. Sometimes certification bodies provide this service for a nominal charge. The pre-assessment audit would provide a degree of confidence for formally going ahead with an application for certification.Step 13. Certification and RegistrationOnce the quality management system has been in operation for a few months and has stabilized, a formal application for certification could be made to a selected certification agency. The certification agency first carries out an audit of the documents (referred to as an “adequacy audit”). If the documents conform to the requirements of the quality standard, then on-site audit is carried out. If the certification body finds the system to be working satisfactorily, it awards the organization a certificate, generallyfor a period of three years. During this three-year period, it will carry out periodic surveillance audits to ensure that the system is continuing to operate satisfactorily.Step 14: Continual ImprovementCertification to ISO 9000 should not be an end. You should continually seek to improve the effectiveness and suitability of the quality management system through the use of:???? Quality policy???? Quality objectives???? Audit results???? Analysis of data???? Corrective and preventive actions???? Management reviewISO 9004:2008 provides a methodology for continual improvement.
1. Total backing from the CEO,2. Genuine and passionate commitment to quality in general and the ISO 9000 qualitymanagement system in particular,3. The dignity – resulting from rank, seniority, or both – to influence managers and others of all levels and functions,4. Detailed knowledge of quality methods in general and ISO 9000 in particular.The members of the implementation team should also be trained on ISO 9000 quality management systems by a professional training organization.
Step 3. Start ISO 9000 Awareness ProgramsISO 9000 awareness programs should be conducted to communicate to theemployees the aim of the ISO 9000 quality management system; the advantage it offers to employees, customers and the organization; how it will work; and their roles and responsibilities within the system. Suppliers of materials and components should also participate in these programs.The awareness program should emphasize the benefits that the organization expects to realize through its ISO 9000 quality management system. The program should also stress the higher levels of participation and self-direction that the quality management system renders to employees. Such a focus will go far to enlist employee support and commitment.The programs could be run either by the implementation team or by experts hired to talk to different levels of employees.Step 4. Provide TrainingSince the ISO 9000 quality management system affects all the areas and all personnel in the organization, training programs should be structured for different categories of employees – senior managers, middle-level managers, supervisors and workers. The ISO 9000 implementation plan should make provision for this training. The training should cover the basic concepts of quality management systems and the standard and their overall impact on the strategic goals of the organization, the changed processes, and the likely work culture implications of the system. In addition, initial training mayalso be necessary on writing quality manuals, procedures and work instruction; auditing principles; techniques of laboratory management; calibration; testing procedures, etc.When in-house capacity to carry out such training is not available, it may be necessary to participate in external training courses run by professional training organizations.Alternatively, an external training institution could be invited to conduct in-house training courses.
Step 5. Conduct Initial Status SurveyISO 9000 does not require duplication of effort or redundant system. The goal of ISO 9000 is to create a quality management system that conforms to the standard. This does not preclude incorporating, adapting, and adding onto quality programs already in place. So the next step in the implementation process is to compare the organization’s existing quality management system, if there is one — with the requirements of thestandard (ISO 9001:2008).For this purpose, an organization flow chart showing how information actually flows (not what should be done) from order placement by the customer to delivery to this customer should be drawn up. From this over-all flow chart, a flow chart of activities in each department should be prepared.With the aid of the flow charts, a record of existing quality management system should be established. A significant number of written procedures may already be in place.Unless they are very much out of date, these documents should not be discarded.Rather, they should be incorporated into the new quality management system.Documents requiring modification or elaboration should be identified and listed. Thisexercise is some times referred to as ” gap analysis”. During these review processes,wide consultation with executives and representatives of various unions andassociations within the organization is required to enlist their active cooperation.In the review process, documents should be collected, studied and registered for further use, possibly after they have been revised. Before developing new quality management system documentation, you need to consider with which quality requirements or department you should start. The best is to select an area where processes are fairly well organized, running effectively and functioning satisfactorily.The basic approach is to determine and record how a process is currently carried out.We can do this by identifying the people involved and obtaining information from them during individual interviews. Unfortunately, it often happens that different people will give different, contradicting versions of a process. Each one may refer to oral instructions that are not accurate or clear. This is why the facts are often not described correctly the first time around, and have to be revised several times.Once it has been agreed how to describe the current process, this process has to be adapted, supplemented and implemented according to the requirements of the quality standard (ISO 9001:2008). This requires organizational arrangements, the drawing up of additional documents and possible removal of existing documentation (e.g. procedures, inspection/test plans, inspection/test instructions) and records (e.g.inspection/test reports, inspection/test certificates).In introducing a quality management system, the emphasis is on the improvement of the existing processes or the re-organization of processes.In general, the steps to follow are the following:Ascertain and establish the following:What is the present operation/process? What already exists?
Analyze the relevant sections of the quality standard – ISO 9001:2000:What is actually required? If necessary, supplement and change operational arrangements in accordance with the standard, develop documents and records, and describe operations/processes:What is the desired operation/process?Figure 1: Steps in introducing a quality management systemThe above gap analysis can be done internally, if the knowledge level is there. Or aformal pre-assessment can be obtained from any one of a large number of ISO 9000consulting, implementing, and registration firms.Step 6. Create a Documented Implementation PlanOnce the organization has obtained a clear picture of how its quality management system compares with the ISO 9001:2008 standard, all non-conformances must be addressed with a documented implementation plan. Usually, the plan calls for identifying and describing processes to make the organization’s quality management system fully in compliance with the standard.The implementation plan should be thorough and specific, detailing:???? Quality documentation to be developed???? Objective of the system???? Pertinent ISO 9001:2008 section???? Person or team responsible???? Approval required???? Training required???? Resources required???? Estimated completion dateThese elements should be organized into a detailed chart, to be reviewed andapproved. The plan should define the responsibilities of different departments and personnel and set target dates for the completion of activities. Once approved, the Management Representative should control, review and update the plan as the implementation process proceeds.Typical implementation action plan is shown in Figure 2. Use ISO 10005:1995 for guidance in quality planning
Step 7. Develop Quality Management System DocumentationDocumentation is the most common area of non-conformance among organizations wishing to implement ISO 9000 quality management systems. As one company pointed out: “When we started our implementation, we found that documentation was inadequate. Even absent, in some areas. Take calibration. Obviously it’s necessary, and obviously we do it, but it wasn’t being documented. Another area was inspection and testing. We inspect and test practically every item that leaves here, but our documentation was inadequate”.Documentation of the quality management system should include:???? Documented statements of a quality policy and quality objectives,???? A quality manual,???? Documented procedures and records required by the standard ISO 9001:2008, and???? Documents needed by the organization to ensure the effective planning, operation and control of its processes.Quality documentation is generally prepared in the three levels indicated in the box that follows. Use ISO 10013:1995 for guidance in quality documentation.
In small companies, the above levels of documentation could be presented in one manual; otherwise, separate manuals should be prepared.A list of the documents to be prepared should be drawn up and the responsibility for writing the documents should be assigned to the persons concerned in various functional departments. They should be advised to prepare the drafts within a specific time frame.Step 8: Document ControlOnce the necessary quality management system documentation has been generated, a documented system must be created to control it. Control is simply a means of managing the creation, approval, distribution, revision, storage, and disposal of the various types of documentation. Document control systems should be as simple and as easy to operate as possible — sufficient to meet ISO 9001:2008 requirements and that is all.Document control should include:???? Approval for adequacy by authorized person (s) before issue,???? Review, updating and re-approval of documents by authorized person (s),???? Identification of changes and of the revision status of documents,???? Availability of relevant versions of documents at points of use,???? Identification and control of documents of external origin,???? Assurance of legibility and identifability of documents, and???? Prevention of unintended use of obsolete documents.The principle of ISO 9000 document control is that employees should have access to the documentation and records needed to fulfil their responsibilities.Step 9. ImplementationIt is good practice to implement the quality management system being documented as the documentation is developed, although this may be more effective in larger firms. In smaller companies, the quality management system is often implemented all at once throughout the organization. Where phased implementation takes place, the effectiveness of the system in selected areas can be evaluated.It would be a good idea initially to evaluate areas where the chances of a positive evaluation are high, to maintain the confidence of both management and staff in the merits of implementing the quality management system.The implementation progress should be monitored to ensure that the qualitymanagement system is effective and conforms to the standard. These activities include internal quality audit, formal corrective action and management review.Step 10. Internal Quality AuditAs the system is being installed, its effectiveness should be checked by regular internal quality audits. Internal quality audits are conducted to verify that the installed quality management system:
???? Conform to the planned arrangements, to the requirements of the standard (ISO 9001:2008) and to the quality management system requirements established by your organization, and???? Is effectively implemented and maintained.Even after the system stabilizes and starts functioning, internal audits should be planned and performed as part of an ongoing strategy.A few staff members should be trained to carry out internal auditing. Use ISO 19011 for guidance in auditing, auditor qualification and programmes.Step 11. Management ReviewWhen the installed quality management system has been operating for three to six months, an internal audit and management review should be conducted and corrective actions implemented. The management reviews are conducted to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system.????The review should include assessing opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system, including the quality policy and quality objectives.The input to management review should include information on:???? Results of audits,???? Customer feed back,???? Process performance and product conformity,???? Status of preventive and corrective actions,???? Follow-up actions from previous management reviews,???? Changes that could affect the quality management system, and???? Recommendations for improvements.Management reviews should also address the pitfalls to effective implementation, including lack of CEO commitment, failure to involve everyone in the process, and failure to monitor progress and enforce deadlines.Step 12. Pre-assessment AuditWhen system deficiencies are no longer visible, it is normally time to apply for certification. However, before doing so, a pre-assessment audit should be arranged with an independent and qualified auditor. Sometimes certification bodies provide this service for a nominal charge. The pre-assessment audit would provide a degree of confidence for formally going ahead with an application for certification.Step 13. Certification and RegistrationOnce the quality management system has been in operation for a few months and has stabilized, a formal application for certification could be made to a selected certification agency. The certification agency first carries out an audit of the documents (referred to as an “adequacy audit”). If the documents conform to the requirements of the quality standard, then on-site audit is carried out. If the certification body finds the system to be working satisfactorily, it awards the organization a certificate, generallyfor a period of three years. During this three-year period, it will carry out periodic surveillance audits to ensure that the system is continuing to operate satisfactorily.Step 14: Continual ImprovementCertification to ISO 9000 should not be an end. You should continually seek to improve the effectiveness and suitability of the quality management system through the use of:???? Quality policy???? Quality objectives???? Audit results???? Analysis of data???? Corrective and preventive actions???? Management reviewISO 9004:2008 provides a methodology for continual improvement.
ISO 14001 Auditing and Registration
ISO 14001 Registration
A registration system has grown up around the implementation of the ISO 9000 quality management documents and has formed the basis for a similar system of registration to ISO 14001. At this writing, ISO 14001 is the only specification_ document of the ISO 14000 series and the only standard that is intended to be auditable; all of the other standards are, or will be, guidance documents.
Registrars – Globally, there are 40 – 50 or more organizations established to register organizations to ISO 14001. These registration organizations are accredited by the standards bodies in, for the most part, major industrial nations that have adopted ISO 14001 as their country’s EMS standard. In the U.S., for example, the body that accredits registrars is the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB). ANAB passes on the credentials of registrars to register organizations to ISO 14001.
ISO 14001 Audits
First-, second-, or third-party auditors can assess an organization’s conformity to the requirements of the standard. First-party Audits – In the first-party circumstance, the internal auditors of the implementing organization conduct an audit to determine that the EMS has been properly implemented and is being maintained. If the organization passes the internal audit, it may self declare_ its conformity to ISO 14001.
Second-party Audits – In the second-party circumstance, the audit is conducted by a representative of a party interested in the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The interested party_ may be a customer, an environmental regulator, an insurance company, or any other organization affected by the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The second-party audit can be a condition of doing business with the auditor’s organization.
Third-party Audits – In the third-party circumstance, an external EMS auditor conducts an audit, usually at the request of the implementing organization, to determine if the organization conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. The third-party audit is most often for the purpose of certifying_ that the organization is in conformity with the requirements of ISO 14001.
Typically, when a registration is awarded, it is for a period of three years with a provision for the periodic conduct of surveillance_ audits to ensure continuing conformity.
A principal benefit of the third-party audit is that it compels organizations to continually maintain the EMS in order to pass the follow-up surveillance audits; without this, there might be slippage in the maintenance of ISO 14001.
It is not a requirement of implementing ISO 14001 that organizations have a registration audit conducted; this is a decision made by each organization based upon its determination of the commercial value or necessity of certifying. When an ISO 14001 EMS is intended to be audited,
the requirements must be implemented and documented sufficiently for an auditor/registrar to be
able to conduct the audit based on the finding of objective evidence that the organization has implemented an EMS conforming to ISO 14001.
Establishing objective evidence requires a higher level of documentation and record keeping than is required for mere implementation of ISO 14001. The implementation of ISO 14001 is a simpler task for the organization when it is only seeking to implement the policy and sixteen procedures than when it is implementing with the intention or expectation of being audited.
A registration system has grown up around the implementation of the ISO 9000 quality management documents and has formed the basis for a similar system of registration to ISO 14001. At this writing, ISO 14001 is the only specification_ document of the ISO 14000 series and the only standard that is intended to be auditable; all of the other standards are, or will be, guidance documents.
Registrars – Globally, there are 40 – 50 or more organizations established to register organizations to ISO 14001. These registration organizations are accredited by the standards bodies in, for the most part, major industrial nations that have adopted ISO 14001 as their country’s EMS standard. In the U.S., for example, the body that accredits registrars is the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB). ANAB passes on the credentials of registrars to register organizations to ISO 14001.
ISO 14001 Audits
First-, second-, or third-party auditors can assess an organization’s conformity to the requirements of the standard. First-party Audits – In the first-party circumstance, the internal auditors of the implementing organization conduct an audit to determine that the EMS has been properly implemented and is being maintained. If the organization passes the internal audit, it may self declare_ its conformity to ISO 14001.
Second-party Audits – In the second-party circumstance, the audit is conducted by a representative of a party interested in the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The interested party_ may be a customer, an environmental regulator, an insurance company, or any other organization affected by the environmental performance of the implementing organization. The second-party audit can be a condition of doing business with the auditor’s organization.
Third-party Audits – In the third-party circumstance, an external EMS auditor conducts an audit, usually at the request of the implementing organization, to determine if the organization conforms to the requirements of ISO 14001. The third-party audit is most often for the purpose of certifying_ that the organization is in conformity with the requirements of ISO 14001.
Typically, when a registration is awarded, it is for a period of three years with a provision for the periodic conduct of surveillance_ audits to ensure continuing conformity.
A principal benefit of the third-party audit is that it compels organizations to continually maintain the EMS in order to pass the follow-up surveillance audits; without this, there might be slippage in the maintenance of ISO 14001.
It is not a requirement of implementing ISO 14001 that organizations have a registration audit conducted; this is a decision made by each organization based upon its determination of the commercial value or necessity of certifying. When an ISO 14001 EMS is intended to be audited,
the requirements must be implemented and documented sufficiently for an auditor/registrar to be
able to conduct the audit based on the finding of objective evidence that the organization has implemented an EMS conforming to ISO 14001.
Establishing objective evidence requires a higher level of documentation and record keeping than is required for mere implementation of ISO 14001. The implementation of ISO 14001 is a simpler task for the organization when it is only seeking to implement the policy and sixteen procedures than when it is implementing with the intention or expectation of being audited.
The Future of ISO 14001
ISO 14001 has the potential to reframe the conduct of environmental management. It has proven to be an elegant document that anticipates the needs of organizations of all sizes and purposes for direction on environmental management.
As ISO 14001 gains credibility as an effective system for managing and improving environmental performance, environmental regulators will be encouraged to accept registration to ISO 14001 in satisfaction of some regulatory administrative requirements and, thus, reduce the burden of compliance for those organizations that are managing their environmental exposures.
Ultimately, the greatest strides in environmental performance improvement and sustainability will come as a consequence of millions of organizations – municipalities, colleges and universities, governmental departments, and property owners and operators as well as industrial corporations – identifying and managing the environmental impacts of their activities, services, and products.
As ISO 14001 gains credibility as an effective system for managing and improving environmental performance, environmental regulators will be encouraged to accept registration to ISO 14001 in satisfaction of some regulatory administrative requirements and, thus, reduce the burden of compliance for those organizations that are managing their environmental exposures.
Ultimately, the greatest strides in environmental performance improvement and sustainability will come as a consequence of millions of organizations – municipalities, colleges and universities, governmental departments, and property owners and operators as well as industrial corporations – identifying and managing the environmental impacts of their activities, services, and products.
ISO 14001:2004 Environment Management System Audit
ISO 14001 Section 4.5.4, Environmental Management System Audits, requires that organizations establish and maintain programs and procedures to conduct periodic EMS audits. The EMS audits must determine if the EMS:
• is properly implemented and maintained
• conforms to the planned arrangements
• meets the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard.
ISO 14001 Section 4.5.4 requires the programs and procedures to define:
• audit scope
• audit frequency
• audit methodologies
• responsibilities and requirements for conducting audit
• communication of the audit results.
• is properly implemented and maintained
• conforms to the planned arrangements
• meets the requirements of the ISO 14001 standard.
ISO 14001 Section 4.5.4 requires the programs and procedures to define:
• audit scope
• audit frequency
• audit methodologies
• responsibilities and requirements for conducting audit
• communication of the audit results.
Assessing the Corporate Impact of ISO 14000 Certification
The 1990s have indeed been a period of change. This has seen a change from a perspective that longer viewed as something that is primarily done for publicity sake or to avoid prosecution. Rather it is recent emergence of the ISO 14000 environmental standard. There are several features that make this
emphasized trade-offs (you can have only one of the following ? shorter lead times, lower costs or higher quality) to a paradigm that stresses simultaneity (you can simultaneously achieve lower costs and higher quality and shorter lead times). This has also become a period when more and more managers are expected to become increasingly environmentally conscious. Being environmentally responsible is no seen as a matter of good business. An indication of the increasing importance of the environment is the new standard noteworthy. First, it builds on the success of ISO 9000, and its variants (e.g., QS 9000). Second, ISO 14000 is an international standard. It is hoped that it will replace the numerous and often conflicting standards found in various countries. Third, ISO 14000 shifts attention from the outcome (reduced pollution) to processes. However, being a new standard, the introduction of ISO 14000 has raised a number of questions, namely:
emphasized trade-offs (you can have only one of the following ? shorter lead times, lower costs or higher quality) to a paradigm that stresses simultaneity (you can simultaneously achieve lower costs and higher quality and shorter lead times). This has also become a period when more and more managers are expected to become increasingly environmentally conscious. Being environmentally responsible is no seen as a matter of good business. An indication of the increasing importance of the environment is the new standard noteworthy. First, it builds on the success of ISO 9000, and its variants (e.g., QS 9000). Second, ISO 14000 is an international standard. It is hoped that it will replace the numerous and often conflicting standards found in various countries. Third, ISO 14000 shifts attention from the outcome (reduced pollution) to processes. However, being a new standard, the introduction of ISO 14000 has raised a number of questions, namely:
ISO 14000 – Environmental Program Management
The ISO 14000 series of standards has
received widespread attention, and, like ISO 9000, it is becoming a requirementfor domestic and global organizations.
This document is intended to provide a
baseline understanding of the ISO 14000 standards and to discuss the current status of this important standard.
The International Organization for Geneva, Switzerland, is composed of 92 European Union (EU) to establish universal quality standards. Over time, ISO
Standardization (IOS), headquartered in member countries. Adherance to standards developed by the IOS is voluntary. However, countries and industries may adopt the IOS standards. Until approximately 15 years ago, IOS focused on traditional standards-setting activities. In 1987, IOS published the ISO 9000 series standards that were used with the 9000 became recognized as a positive indicator of quality and a prerequisite to establishing/maintaining business relationships within and outside the European Union.
In the United States, both the American
National Standards Institute and the American Society of Quality Control are privately funded organizations that have adopted ISO 9000, Quality Management, and the ISO 14000 standards.
ISO 14000 is the generic title given to 14040, ISO 14041, and ISO14050 have
the 14000 series of standards. ISO 14001, ISO 14004, ISO 14010, ISO 14011, ISO 14012, ISO 14020, ISO been published as international standards. The ISO 14000 series of standards consists of the following 18 subjects that can be grouped under two major headings:
14001 Specification with Guidance for Use
14004 General Guidelines on Principles,
14010 General Principles of Environmental Auditing
14011 Audit Procedures
14012 Environmental Auditing ? Qualification Criteria
14015 Environmental Site Assessments
14031 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Guidelines
14032 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Case Studies
14020 Goals and Principles of All Environmental Labeling
14021 Environmental Labels and Declarations ? Terms and Definitions
14024 Environmental Labels and
14025 Type III Labeling
14040 Life Cycle Assessment ? Principles and Framework
14041 Life Cycle Assessment ? Inventory Analysis
14042 Life Cycle Assessment ? ImpactAssessment
14043 Life Cycle Assessment ? Interpretation
14048 Life Cycle Indicator Format
14050 Guide on the Principles of Terminology Work
At the current time, the ISO 14000 as International Standards are referred to
Standards that have not been published as Draft International Standards (DIS). Most DIS are in the final review period before publication. If a particular standard is of interest and is not final, a copy of the DIS may be available for review.
received widespread attention, and, like ISO 9000, it is becoming a requirementfor domestic and global organizations.
This document is intended to provide a
baseline understanding of the ISO 14000 standards and to discuss the current status of this important standard.
The International Organization for Geneva, Switzerland, is composed of 92 European Union (EU) to establish universal quality standards. Over time, ISO
Standardization (IOS), headquartered in member countries. Adherance to standards developed by the IOS is voluntary. However, countries and industries may adopt the IOS standards. Until approximately 15 years ago, IOS focused on traditional standards-setting activities. In 1987, IOS published the ISO 9000 series standards that were used with the 9000 became recognized as a positive indicator of quality and a prerequisite to establishing/maintaining business relationships within and outside the European Union.
In the United States, both the American
National Standards Institute and the American Society of Quality Control are privately funded organizations that have adopted ISO 9000, Quality Management, and the ISO 14000 standards.
ISO 14000 is the generic title given to 14040, ISO 14041, and ISO14050 have
the 14000 series of standards. ISO 14001, ISO 14004, ISO 14010, ISO 14011, ISO 14012, ISO 14020, ISO been published as international standards. The ISO 14000 series of standards consists of the following 18 subjects that can be grouped under two major headings:
14001 Specification with Guidance for Use
14004 General Guidelines on Principles,
14010 General Principles of Environmental Auditing
14011 Audit Procedures
14012 Environmental Auditing ? Qualification Criteria
14015 Environmental Site Assessments
14031 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Guidelines
14032 Evaluation of Environmental Performance ? Case Studies
14020 Goals and Principles of All Environmental Labeling
14021 Environmental Labels and Declarations ? Terms and Definitions
14024 Environmental Labels and
14025 Type III Labeling
14040 Life Cycle Assessment ? Principles and Framework
14041 Life Cycle Assessment ? Inventory Analysis
14042 Life Cycle Assessment ? ImpactAssessment
14043 Life Cycle Assessment ? Interpretation
14048 Life Cycle Indicator Format
14050 Guide on the Principles of Terminology Work
At the current time, the ISO 14000 as International Standards are referred to
Standards that have not been published as Draft International Standards (DIS). Most DIS are in the final review period before publication. If a particular standard is of interest and is not final, a copy of the DIS may be available for review.
The Development of EMS Standards
The world’s first standard for environmental management systems (EMS) – BS 7750 – wasdeveloped and published by the British Standards Institution (BSI) in 1992. This standard was the model for the ISO 14000 Series developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14001, which establishes the requirements for an EMS, was finalized in 1996. BS 7750 was also the basis for the European Union’s Eco-Management and Audit scheme, known as EMAS.
ISO is an international standard and therefore must incorporate the different interests ofmany countries. This standard clearly has the weakest requirements. By contrast, EMAS is the most stringent and detailed standard reflecting the high environmental standards of German interests and companies which played a key role developing it.
Because ISO 14001 and EMAS are both based on BS 7750, all three standards arequite similar in their approach. If your organization complies with BS 7750 today, little effort will be needed to fullfill the requirements of ISO 14001 or EMAS. Be aware however, that EMAS emphasizes public environmental reporting.
Today there are two major areas in the evaluation of environmental management practice.One area focuses on organizational issues, and the other on products, services and processes.
1. Organization Evaluation
a. Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001, 14004)
b. Environmental Performance Evaluation (ISO 14014, 14015, 14031)
c. Environmental Auditing (ISO 14010, 14011, 14012, 14013, 14014)
2. Products, Services and Processes
a. Life Cycle Assessment (ISO 14040, 14041, 14042, 14043)
b. Environmental Labeling (ISO 14020, 14021, 14022, 14023, 1402X)
c. Environmental Aspects in Product Standards (ISO 14060)
ISO is an international standard and therefore must incorporate the different interests ofmany countries. This standard clearly has the weakest requirements. By contrast, EMAS is the most stringent and detailed standard reflecting the high environmental standards of German interests and companies which played a key role developing it.
Because ISO 14001 and EMAS are both based on BS 7750, all three standards arequite similar in their approach. If your organization complies with BS 7750 today, little effort will be needed to fullfill the requirements of ISO 14001 or EMAS. Be aware however, that EMAS emphasizes public environmental reporting.
Today there are two major areas in the evaluation of environmental management practice.One area focuses on organizational issues, and the other on products, services and processes.
1. Organization Evaluation
a. Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001, 14004)
b. Environmental Performance Evaluation (ISO 14014, 14015, 14031)
c. Environmental Auditing (ISO 14010, 14011, 14012, 14013, 14014)
2. Products, Services and Processes
a. Life Cycle Assessment (ISO 14040, 14041, 14042, 14043)
b. Environmental Labeling (ISO 14020, 14021, 14022, 14023, 1402X)
c. Environmental Aspects in Product Standards (ISO 14060)
Commitment and Environmental Policy
An environmental policy is a statement of the organization’s overall aims and principles ofaction with respect to the environment, including compliance with all relevant stakeholders. As such, it should be written clearly and concisely to enable a
regulatory requirements. It is a key tool in communicating the environmental priorities of your organization to employees at all levels, as well as to external layperson to understand it, and should be made publicly available. It is up to the organization to decide on environmental priorities based on an initial environmental review, but these choices should be justified in the policy. To be truly effective the policy should regularly be reviewed and revised and incorporated into the organization’s overall corporate policy. The policy statement should set in writing a few achievable quantifiable priorities related to the environmental management system and the significant environmental effects found at the work-site. Furthermore, EMAS requires that the most signifcant environmental effects be mitigated within three years. Some form of improvement must also be accomplished from year-to-year by the organization and must be shown in the annual reports.
Although the formulation of policies and clear priorities is the most important step of
environmental management, this step is often neglected. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Environmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities but no clear direction. For an organization to be a credible and efficient environmental performer and to reap the benefits of being an environmental leader in its markets, the rationale for investing in environmental management must be very clear.
To ensure an organization’s commitment towards a formulated environmental policy, it is
essential that top management is involved in the process of formulating the policy and of setting priorities. Therefore the first step is to get the commitment from the highest level of management. Based on this commitment the organization should then conduct an initial environmental review and draft an environmental policy. This draft should be discussed and approved by the board of directors. Finally, the approved environmental policy statement must be communicated internally and made available to the public.
As the environmental policy establishes an overall sense of direction and sets the principles
of action for an organization, it requires commitment from the highest level of management. Top management should be involved in the development and adoption of an environmental policy.
Getting the commitment from the highest level should be argued on the basis of costs and the implementation of an EMS increases shareholder value it is easier for top
benefits and their impact on shareholder value. If management to commit themselves to approving an environmental policy and to implementing an environmental management system. This commitment includes three basic policy statements:
Continuous improvement in environmental performance
Compliance with environmental regulations
Maintaining public relations regarding environmental issues of the organization, its activities, products and services.
The central focus of the policy should be a commitment to continuous improvement. This
means improvement in the EMS itself and a decrease in environmental impacts caused by an organization’s activities, products and services. It is important for businesses to show improvement over time, both in environmental performance and in organizational commitment to this path.
A commitment to comply with at least local environmental regulations is a minimum
requirement for all of the environmental standards. However, multinationals operating in various environments and facing different laws in each, should think about which laws to abide by and if it is feasible to adopt the same standard worldwide. Generally, laws in newly industrializing countries are lax as compared to industrialized countries. However, given the increase in interest in environmental issues in these industrializing countries and the possible impact of the ISO 14000 series, it may be sound practice to adopt the more stringent laws in worldwide operations, where it is feasible to do so. In addition, the adoption of high standards worldwide can yield other benefits, such as an improved public image or easier technology transfer between different sites.
Companies should guard against going overboard in fulfilling environmental policies. Limits
are in fact set on how far a company has to go to reduce its environmental impacts. Reductions do not have to exceed levels which can be achieved by economically viable application of the best available technology (BAT).
regulatory requirements. It is a key tool in communicating the environmental priorities of your organization to employees at all levels, as well as to external layperson to understand it, and should be made publicly available. It is up to the organization to decide on environmental priorities based on an initial environmental review, but these choices should be justified in the policy. To be truly effective the policy should regularly be reviewed and revised and incorporated into the organization’s overall corporate policy. The policy statement should set in writing a few achievable quantifiable priorities related to the environmental management system and the significant environmental effects found at the work-site. Furthermore, EMAS requires that the most signifcant environmental effects be mitigated within three years. Some form of improvement must also be accomplished from year-to-year by the organization and must be shown in the annual reports.
Although the formulation of policies and clear priorities is the most important step of
environmental management, this step is often neglected. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Environmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities but no clear direction. For an organization to be a credible and efficient environmental performer and to reap the benefits of being an environmental leader in its markets, the rationale for investing in environmental management must be very clear.
To ensure an organization’s commitment towards a formulated environmental policy, it is
essential that top management is involved in the process of formulating the policy and of setting priorities. Therefore the first step is to get the commitment from the highest level of management. Based on this commitment the organization should then conduct an initial environmental review and draft an environmental policy. This draft should be discussed and approved by the board of directors. Finally, the approved environmental policy statement must be communicated internally and made available to the public.
As the environmental policy establishes an overall sense of direction and sets the principles
of action for an organization, it requires commitment from the highest level of management. Top management should be involved in the development and adoption of an environmental policy.
Getting the commitment from the highest level should be argued on the basis of costs and the implementation of an EMS increases shareholder value it is easier for top
benefits and their impact on shareholder value. If management to commit themselves to approving an environmental policy and to implementing an environmental management system. This commitment includes three basic policy statements:
Continuous improvement in environmental performance
Compliance with environmental regulations
Maintaining public relations regarding environmental issues of the organization, its activities, products and services.
The central focus of the policy should be a commitment to continuous improvement. This
means improvement in the EMS itself and a decrease in environmental impacts caused by an organization’s activities, products and services. It is important for businesses to show improvement over time, both in environmental performance and in organizational commitment to this path.
A commitment to comply with at least local environmental regulations is a minimum
requirement for all of the environmental standards. However, multinationals operating in various environments and facing different laws in each, should think about which laws to abide by and if it is feasible to adopt the same standard worldwide. Generally, laws in newly industrializing countries are lax as compared to industrialized countries. However, given the increase in interest in environmental issues in these industrializing countries and the possible impact of the ISO 14000 series, it may be sound practice to adopt the more stringent laws in worldwide operations, where it is feasible to do so. In addition, the adoption of high standards worldwide can yield other benefits, such as an improved public image or easier technology transfer between different sites.
Companies should guard against going overboard in fulfilling environmental policies. Limits
are in fact set on how far a company has to go to reduce its environmental impacts. Reductions do not have to exceed levels which can be achieved by economically viable application of the best available technology (BAT).
Measurement and Evaluation In ISO 14001:2004
After implementing the environmental policy, management needs to measure environmental that the data can be verified by an internal or external auditor.
interventions and their impact on the environment. This is done by building up an environmental effects register (environmental inventory). All equipment used for monitoring and measuring must be accurate and calibrated on a regular basis. To check the compliance status of an organization, additional information about regulations and other requirements is needed. A so called environmental regulations register?Eis often installed and maintained for this purpose. To obtain a better picture about the financial consequences of environmental protection, the accounting system should reflect environmental costs. Therefore, information about environmentally-induced costs and earnings needs to be collected. All this information should be recorded in such a manner.er
Environmental Performance Evaluation Accesses Environment Performance against environmental targets and objectives and against applicable environmental regulations. Responsibilities and authority need to be defined to deal with non-compliance within the EMS. This includes specifying the actions to be taken to correct an undesirable ituation and to prevent future non-compliance.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco
efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management. The recording of physical environmental data, environmental regulations and environmentally-induced financial information is necessary as a basis for effective decision making. Therefore, financial, legal and ecological data systems must be built up from scratch or adapted to the requirements of the EMS standard.
interventions and their impact on the environment. This is done by building up an environmental effects register (environmental inventory). All equipment used for monitoring and measuring must be accurate and calibrated on a regular basis. To check the compliance status of an organization, additional information about regulations and other requirements is needed. A so called environmental regulations register?Eis often installed and maintained for this purpose. To obtain a better picture about the financial consequences of environmental protection, the accounting system should reflect environmental costs. Therefore, information about environmentally-induced costs and earnings needs to be collected. All this information should be recorded in such a manner.er
Environmental Performance Evaluation Accesses Environment Performance against environmental targets and objectives and against applicable environmental regulations. Responsibilities and authority need to be defined to deal with non-compliance within the EMS. This includes specifying the actions to be taken to correct an undesirable ituation and to prevent future non-compliance.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management.
The analysis of environmental and economic performance leads to eco
efficiency, the key component in sustainable business management. The recording of physical environmental data, environmental regulations and environmentally-induced financial information is necessary as a basis for effective decision making. Therefore, financial, legal and ecological data systems must be built up from scratch or adapted to the requirements of the EMS standard.
Basic QC and Six Sigma Tools
The 7 QC Tools
The Seven Quality Control tools (7QC tools) are graphical and statistical tools which are most often used in QC for continuous improvement. Since they are so widely utilized by almost every level of the company, they have been nicknamed the Magnificent Seven. They are applicable to improvements in all dimensions of the process performance triangle: variation of quality, cycle time and yield of productivity.
Each one of the 7QC tools had been used separately before 1960. However, in the early 1960s, they were gathered together by a small group of Japanese scientists lead by Kaoru Ishikawa, with the aim of providing the QC Circles with effective and easy-to-use tools. They are, in alphabetical order, cause-and-effect diagram, check sheet, control chart, histogram, Pareto chart, scatter diagram and stratification. In Six Sigma, they are extensively used in all phases of the improvement methodology – define, measure, analyze, improve and control.
(1) Cause-and-effect diagram
An effective tool as part of a problem-solving process is the cause-and-effect diagram, also known as the Ishikawa diagram (after its originator) or fishbone diagram. This technique is useful to trigger ideas and promote a balanced approach in group brainstorming sessions where individuals list the perceived sources (causes) with respect to outcomes (effect).
When constructing a cause-and-effect diagram, it is often appropriate to consider six main causes that can contribute to an outcome response (effect): so-called 5M1E (man, machine, material, method, measurement, and environment).
When preparing a cause-and-effect diagram, the first step is to agree on the specific wording of the effect and then to identify the main causes that can possibly produce the effect. The main causes can often be identified as any of 5M1E, which helps us to get started, but these are by no means exhaustive.
Using brainstorming techniques, each main cause is analyzed. The aim is to refine the list of causes in greater detail until the root causes of that particular main cause are established. The same procedure is then followed for each of the other main causes. The method is a main cause, the pressure and the temperature are the causes, and “the pressure is low” and “the temperature is too high” are the root causes.
(2) Check sheet
The check sheet is used for the specific data collection of any desired characteristics of a process or product that is to be improved. It is frequently used in the measure phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, DMAIC. For practical purposes, the check sheet is commonly formatted as a table. It is important that the check sheet is kept simple and that its design is aligned to the characteristics that are measured. Consideration should be given as to who should gather the data and what measurement intervals to apply. For example, Figure 4.2 shows a check sheet for defect items in an assembly process of automobile ratios.
(3) Control chart
(a) Introduction
The control chart is a very important tool in the “analyze, improve and control” phases of the Six Sigma improvement methodology. In the “analyze” phase, control charts are applied to judge if the process is predictable; in the “improve” phase, to identify evidence of special causes of variation so that they can be acted on; in the “control” phase, to verify that the performance of the process is under control.
The original concept of the control chart was proposed by Walter A. Shewhart in 1924 and the tool has been used extensively in industry since the Second World War, especially in Japan and the USA after about 1980. Control charts offer the study of variation and its source. They can give process monitoring and control, and can also give direction for improvements. They can separate special from common cause issues of a process. They can give early identification of special causes so that there can be timely resolution before many poor quality products are produced. Shewhart control charts track processes by plotting data over time in the form shown in Figure 4.3. This chart can track either variables or attribute process parameters. The types of variable charts are process mean (x), range (R), standard deviation (s), individual value (x) and moving range (Rs). The attribute types are fraction nonconforming (p), number of nonconforming items (np), number of nonconformities (c), and nonconformities per unit (u).
(4) Histogram
It is meaningful to present data in a form that visually illustrates the frequency of occurrence of values. In the analysis phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, histograms are commonly applied to learn about the distribution of the data within the results Ys and the causes Xs collected in the measure phase and they are also used to obtain an understanding of the potential for improvements.
(5) Pareto chart
The Pareto chart was introduced in the 1940s by Joseph M.Juran, who named it after the Italian economist and statistician Vilfredo Pareto, 1848–1923. It is applied to distinguish the “vital few from the trivial many” as Juran formulated the purpose of the Pareto chart. It is closely related to the so-called 80/20 rule – “80% of the problems stem from 20% of the causes,” or in Six Sigma terms “80% of the poor values in Y stem from 20% of the Xs.”
In the Six Sigma improvement methodology, the Pareto chart has two primary applications. One is for selecting appropriate improvement projects in the define phase. Here it offers a very objective basis for selection, based on, for example, frequency of occurrence, cost saving and improvement potential in process performance.
The other primary application is in the analyze phase for identifying the vital few causes (Xs) that will constitute the greatest improvement in Y if appropriate measures are taken.
A procedure to construct a Pareto chart is as follows:
1) Define the problem and process characteristics to use in the diagram.
2) Define the period of time for the diagram – for example, weekly, daily, or shift.
Quality improvements over time can later be made from the information determined within this step.
3) Obtain the total number of times each characteristic occurred.
4) Rank the characteristics according to the totals from
(6) Scatter diagram
The scatter plot is a useful way to discover the relationship between two factors, X and Y, i.e., the correlation. An important feature of the scatter plot is its visualization of the correlation pattern, through which the relationship can be determined. In the improve phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, one often searches the collected data for Xs that have a special influence on Y. Knowing the existence of such relationships, it is possible to identify input variables that
cause special variation of the result variable. It can then be determined how to set the input variables, if they are controllable, so that the process is improved. When several Xs may influence the values of Y, one scatter plot should be drawn for each combination of the Xs and Y.
(7) Stratification
Stratification is a tool used to split collected data into subgroups in order to determine if any of them contain special cause variation. Hence, data from different sources in a process can be separated and analyzed individually. Stratification is mainly used in the analyze phase to stratify data in the
search for special cause variation in the Six Sigma improvement methodology.
The most important decision in using stratification is to determine the criteria by which to stratify. Examples can be machines, material, suppliers, shifts, day and night, age groups and so on. It is common to stratify into two groups. If the number of observations is large enough, more detailed stratification is also possible.
The Seven Quality Control tools (7QC tools) are graphical and statistical tools which are most often used in QC for continuous improvement. Since they are so widely utilized by almost every level of the company, they have been nicknamed the Magnificent Seven. They are applicable to improvements in all dimensions of the process performance triangle: variation of quality, cycle time and yield of productivity.
Each one of the 7QC tools had been used separately before 1960. However, in the early 1960s, they were gathered together by a small group of Japanese scientists lead by Kaoru Ishikawa, with the aim of providing the QC Circles with effective and easy-to-use tools. They are, in alphabetical order, cause-and-effect diagram, check sheet, control chart, histogram, Pareto chart, scatter diagram and stratification. In Six Sigma, they are extensively used in all phases of the improvement methodology – define, measure, analyze, improve and control.
(1) Cause-and-effect diagram
An effective tool as part of a problem-solving process is the cause-and-effect diagram, also known as the Ishikawa diagram (after its originator) or fishbone diagram. This technique is useful to trigger ideas and promote a balanced approach in group brainstorming sessions where individuals list the perceived sources (causes) with respect to outcomes (effect).
When constructing a cause-and-effect diagram, it is often appropriate to consider six main causes that can contribute to an outcome response (effect): so-called 5M1E (man, machine, material, method, measurement, and environment).
When preparing a cause-and-effect diagram, the first step is to agree on the specific wording of the effect and then to identify the main causes that can possibly produce the effect. The main causes can often be identified as any of 5M1E, which helps us to get started, but these are by no means exhaustive.
Using brainstorming techniques, each main cause is analyzed. The aim is to refine the list of causes in greater detail until the root causes of that particular main cause are established. The same procedure is then followed for each of the other main causes. The method is a main cause, the pressure and the temperature are the causes, and “the pressure is low” and “the temperature is too high” are the root causes.
(2) Check sheet
The check sheet is used for the specific data collection of any desired characteristics of a process or product that is to be improved. It is frequently used in the measure phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, DMAIC. For practical purposes, the check sheet is commonly formatted as a table. It is important that the check sheet is kept simple and that its design is aligned to the characteristics that are measured. Consideration should be given as to who should gather the data and what measurement intervals to apply. For example, Figure 4.2 shows a check sheet for defect items in an assembly process of automobile ratios.
(3) Control chart
(a) Introduction
The control chart is a very important tool in the “analyze, improve and control” phases of the Six Sigma improvement methodology. In the “analyze” phase, control charts are applied to judge if the process is predictable; in the “improve” phase, to identify evidence of special causes of variation so that they can be acted on; in the “control” phase, to verify that the performance of the process is under control.
The original concept of the control chart was proposed by Walter A. Shewhart in 1924 and the tool has been used extensively in industry since the Second World War, especially in Japan and the USA after about 1980. Control charts offer the study of variation and its source. They can give process monitoring and control, and can also give direction for improvements. They can separate special from common cause issues of a process. They can give early identification of special causes so that there can be timely resolution before many poor quality products are produced. Shewhart control charts track processes by plotting data over time in the form shown in Figure 4.3. This chart can track either variables or attribute process parameters. The types of variable charts are process mean (x), range (R), standard deviation (s), individual value (x) and moving range (Rs). The attribute types are fraction nonconforming (p), number of nonconforming items (np), number of nonconformities (c), and nonconformities per unit (u).
(4) Histogram
It is meaningful to present data in a form that visually illustrates the frequency of occurrence of values. In the analysis phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, histograms are commonly applied to learn about the distribution of the data within the results Ys and the causes Xs collected in the measure phase and they are also used to obtain an understanding of the potential for improvements.
(5) Pareto chart
The Pareto chart was introduced in the 1940s by Joseph M.Juran, who named it after the Italian economist and statistician Vilfredo Pareto, 1848–1923. It is applied to distinguish the “vital few from the trivial many” as Juran formulated the purpose of the Pareto chart. It is closely related to the so-called 80/20 rule – “80% of the problems stem from 20% of the causes,” or in Six Sigma terms “80% of the poor values in Y stem from 20% of the Xs.”
In the Six Sigma improvement methodology, the Pareto chart has two primary applications. One is for selecting appropriate improvement projects in the define phase. Here it offers a very objective basis for selection, based on, for example, frequency of occurrence, cost saving and improvement potential in process performance.
The other primary application is in the analyze phase for identifying the vital few causes (Xs) that will constitute the greatest improvement in Y if appropriate measures are taken.
A procedure to construct a Pareto chart is as follows:
1) Define the problem and process characteristics to use in the diagram.
2) Define the period of time for the diagram – for example, weekly, daily, or shift.
Quality improvements over time can later be made from the information determined within this step.
3) Obtain the total number of times each characteristic occurred.
4) Rank the characteristics according to the totals from
(6) Scatter diagram
The scatter plot is a useful way to discover the relationship between two factors, X and Y, i.e., the correlation. An important feature of the scatter plot is its visualization of the correlation pattern, through which the relationship can be determined. In the improve phase of the Six Sigma improvement methodology, one often searches the collected data for Xs that have a special influence on Y. Knowing the existence of such relationships, it is possible to identify input variables that
cause special variation of the result variable. It can then be determined how to set the input variables, if they are controllable, so that the process is improved. When several Xs may influence the values of Y, one scatter plot should be drawn for each combination of the Xs and Y.
(7) Stratification
Stratification is a tool used to split collected data into subgroups in order to determine if any of them contain special cause variation. Hence, data from different sources in a process can be separated and analyzed individually. Stratification is mainly used in the analyze phase to stratify data in the
search for special cause variation in the Six Sigma improvement methodology.
The most important decision in using stratification is to determine the criteria by which to stratify. Examples can be machines, material, suppliers, shifts, day and night, age groups and so on. It is common to stratify into two groups. If the number of observations is large enough, more detailed stratification is also possible.
TQM and Six Sigma
While Six Sigma is definitely succeeding in creating some impressive results and culture changes in some influential organizations, it is certainly not yet a widespread success. Total Quality Management (TQM) seems less visible in many businesses than it was in the early 1990s. However, many companies are still engaged in improvement efforts based on the principles and tools of TQM. It appears at least in Korea that Six Sigma is succeeding while TQM is losing its momentum.
One of the problems that plagued many of the early TQM initiatives was the preeminence placed on quality at the expense of all other aspects of the business. Some organizations experienced severe financial consequences in the rush to make quality “first among equals.” The disconnection between management systems designed to measure customer satisfaction and those designed to measure provider profitability often led to unwise investments in quality, which has been often practiced in TQM. Ronald Snee (1999) points out that although some people believe it is nothing new, Six Sigma is unique in its approach and deployment. He defines Six Sigma as a strategic business improvement approach that seeks to increase both customer satisfaction and an organization’s financial health. Snee goes on to claim that the following eight characteristics account for Six Sigma’s increasing bottom-line (net income or profit) success and popularity with executives.
• Bottom-line results expected and delivered
• Senior management leadership
• A disciplined approach (DMAIC)
• Rapid (3–6 months) project completion
• Clearly defined measures of success
• Infrastructure roles for Six Sigma practitioners and leadership
• Focus on customers and processes
• A sound statistical approach to improvement
Other quality initiatives including TQM have laid claim to a subset of these characteristics, but only Six Sigma attributes its success to the simultaneous application of all eight. Six Sigma is regarded as a vigorous rebirth of quality ideals and methods, as these are applied with even greater passion and commitment than often was the case in the past. Six Sigma is revealing a potential for success that goes beyond the levels of improvement achieved through the many TQM efforts. Some of the mistakes of yesterday’s TQM efforts certainly might be repeated in a Six Sigma initiative if we are not careful.
A review of some of the major TQM pitfalls, as well as hints on how the Six Sigma system can keep them from derailing our efforts is listed below.
1. Links to the business and bottom-line success:
In TQM, quality often was a “sidebar” activity, separated from the key issues of business strategy and performance. The link to the business and bottom-line success was undermined, despite the term “total” quality, since the effort actually was limited to product and manufacturing functions. Six Sigma emphasizes reduction of costs, thereby contributing to the bottom-line, and participation of three major areas: manufacturing, R&D and service parts.
2. Top-level management leadership:
In many TQM efforts, top-level management’s skepticism has been apparent, or their willingness to drive quality ideas has been weak. Passion for and belief in Six Sigma at the very summit of the business is unquestioned in companies like
Motorola, GE, Allied Signal (now Honeywell), LG and Samsung. In fact, top-level management involvement is the beginning of Six Sigma.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.
4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money to help people meet those standards.
5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.
6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.
4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money
to help people meet those standards.
5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.
6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success
One of the problems that plagued many of the early TQM initiatives was the preeminence placed on quality at the expense of all other aspects of the business. Some organizations experienced severe financial consequences in the rush to make quality “first among equals.” The disconnection between management systems designed to measure customer satisfaction and those designed to measure provider profitability often led to unwise investments in quality, which has been often practiced in TQM. Ronald Snee (1999) points out that although some people believe it is nothing new, Six Sigma is unique in its approach and deployment. He defines Six Sigma as a strategic business improvement approach that seeks to increase both customer satisfaction and an organization’s financial health. Snee goes on to claim that the following eight characteristics account for Six Sigma’s increasing bottom-line (net income or profit) success and popularity with executives.
• Bottom-line results expected and delivered
• Senior management leadership
• A disciplined approach (DMAIC)
• Rapid (3–6 months) project completion
• Clearly defined measures of success
• Infrastructure roles for Six Sigma practitioners and leadership
• Focus on customers and processes
• A sound statistical approach to improvement
Other quality initiatives including TQM have laid claim to a subset of these characteristics, but only Six Sigma attributes its success to the simultaneous application of all eight. Six Sigma is regarded as a vigorous rebirth of quality ideals and methods, as these are applied with even greater passion and commitment than often was the case in the past. Six Sigma is revealing a potential for success that goes beyond the levels of improvement achieved through the many TQM efforts. Some of the mistakes of yesterday’s TQM efforts certainly might be repeated in a Six Sigma initiative if we are not careful.
A review of some of the major TQM pitfalls, as well as hints on how the Six Sigma system can keep them from derailing our efforts is listed below.
1. Links to the business and bottom-line success:
In TQM, quality often was a “sidebar” activity, separated from the key issues of business strategy and performance. The link to the business and bottom-line success was undermined, despite the term “total” quality, since the effort actually was limited to product and manufacturing functions. Six Sigma emphasizes reduction of costs, thereby contributing to the bottom-line, and participation of three major areas: manufacturing, R&D and service parts.
2. Top-level management leadership:
In many TQM efforts, top-level management’s skepticism has been apparent, or their willingness to drive quality ideas has been weak. Passion for and belief in Six Sigma at the very summit of the business is unquestioned in companies like
Motorola, GE, Allied Signal (now Honeywell), LG and Samsung. In fact, top-level management involvement is the beginning of Six Sigma.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.
4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money to help people meet those standards.
5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.
6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success.
3. Clear and simple message:
The fuzziness of TQM started with the word “quality” itself. It is a familiar term with many shades of meaning. In many companies, Quality was an existing department with specific responsibilities for “quality control” or “quality assurance,” where the discipline tended to focus more on stabilizing rather than improving processes. Also TQM does not provide a clear goal at which to aim. The concept of Six Sigma is clear and simple. It is a business system for achieving and sustaining success through customer focus, process management and improvement, and the wise use of facts and data. A clear goal (3. 4 DPMO or 6s quality level) is the centerpiece of Six Sigma.
4. Effective training:
TQM training was ineffective in the sense that the training program was not so systematic. Six Sigma divides all the employees into five groups (WB, GB, BB, MBB and Champion), and it sets very demanding standards for learning, backing them up with the necessary investment in time and money
to help people meet those standards.
5. Internal barriers:
TQM was a mostly “departmentalized” activity in many companies, and it seemed that TQM failed to break down internal barriers among departments. Six Sigma places priority on cross-functional process management, and cross-functional project teams are created, which eventually breaks down internal barriers.
6. Project team activities:
TQM utilized many “quality circles” of blue-collar operators and workers, and not many “task force teams” of white-collar engineers even if they are needed. Six Sigma demands a lot of project teams of BBs and GBs, and the project team activities are one of the major sources of bottom-line and top-line success
ISO 9000 Series and Six Sigma
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 9000 series standards were first published in 1987, revised in 1994, and re-revised in 2000 by the ISO. The 2000 revision, denoted by ISO 9000:2000, has attracted broad expectations in industry.
As of the year 2001, more than 300,000 organizations world-wide have been certified to the ISO 9000 series standards. It embodies a consistent pair of standards, ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000, both of which have been significantly updated and modernized. The ISO 9001:2000 standard specifies requirements for a quality management system for which third-party certification is possible, whereas ISO 9004:2000 provides guide- lines for a comprehensive quality management system and performance improvement through Self-Assessment.
The origin and historical development of ISO 9000 and Six Sigma are very different. The genesis of ISO 9000 can be traced back to the standards that the British aviation industry and the U.S. Air Force developed in the 1920s to reduce the need for inspection by approving the conformance of suppliers’ product quality. These standards developed into requirements for suppliers’ quality assurance systems in a number of western countries in the 1970s. In 1987 they were amalgamated into the ISO 9000 series standards.
Independent of ISO 9000, the same year also saw the launch of Six Sigma at Motorola and the launch of Self-Assessment by means of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in USA. Both Six Sigma and Self-Assessment can be traced back to Walter A. Shewhart and his work on variation and continuous improvement in the 1920s. It was Japanese industry that pioneered a broad application of these ideas from the 1950s through to the 1970s. When variation and continuous improvement caught the attention of some of the American business leaders in the late 1980s, it took the form of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, on a national level, and of Six Sigma at Motorola.
Some people are wondering if the ISO 9000:2000 series standards make Six Sigma superfluous. They typically refer to clause 8 of ISO 9001: “Measurement, analysis, improvement.”
It requires that companies install procedures in operations for the measurement of processes and data analysis using statistical techniques with the demonstration of continuous improvement . They also partly refer to the ISO 9004:2000 standards that embody guidelines and criteria for Self-Assessment similar to the national quality awards.
The author firmly believes that Six Sigma is needed regardless of whether a company is compliant with the ISO 9000 series. The two initiatives are not mutually exclusive and the objectives in applying them are different. A Six Sigma program is applied in organizations based on its top-line and bottom-line rationales. The primary objective for applying the ISO 9000 series standards is to demonstrate the company’s capability to consistently provide conforming products and/or services. Therefore, the ISO 9000 series standard falls well short of making Six Sigma superfluous.
The ISO 9000 series standards have from their early days been regarded and practiced by industry as a minimum set of requirements for doing business. The new ISO 9000:2000 stan
dards do not represent a significant change to this perspective. Six Sigma on the other hand, aims at world-class performance, based on a pragmatic framework for continuous improvement.
The author believes that Six Sigma is superior in such important areas as rate of improvement, bottom-line and top-line results, customer satisfaction, and top-level management commitment. However, considering the stronghold of ISO 9000 in industry, Six Sigma and ISO 9000 are likely to be applied by the same organization, but for very different purposes.
As of the year 2001, more than 300,000 organizations world-wide have been certified to the ISO 9000 series standards. It embodies a consistent pair of standards, ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 9004:2000, both of which have been significantly updated and modernized. The ISO 9001:2000 standard specifies requirements for a quality management system for which third-party certification is possible, whereas ISO 9004:2000 provides guide- lines for a comprehensive quality management system and performance improvement through Self-Assessment.
The origin and historical development of ISO 9000 and Six Sigma are very different. The genesis of ISO 9000 can be traced back to the standards that the British aviation industry and the U.S. Air Force developed in the 1920s to reduce the need for inspection by approving the conformance of suppliers’ product quality. These standards developed into requirements for suppliers’ quality assurance systems in a number of western countries in the 1970s. In 1987 they were amalgamated into the ISO 9000 series standards.
Independent of ISO 9000, the same year also saw the launch of Six Sigma at Motorola and the launch of Self-Assessment by means of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in USA. Both Six Sigma and Self-Assessment can be traced back to Walter A. Shewhart and his work on variation and continuous improvement in the 1920s. It was Japanese industry that pioneered a broad application of these ideas from the 1950s through to the 1970s. When variation and continuous improvement caught the attention of some of the American business leaders in the late 1980s, it took the form of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, on a national level, and of Six Sigma at Motorola.
Some people are wondering if the ISO 9000:2000 series standards make Six Sigma superfluous. They typically refer to clause 8 of ISO 9001: “Measurement, analysis, improvement.”
It requires that companies install procedures in operations for the measurement of processes and data analysis using statistical techniques with the demonstration of continuous improvement . They also partly refer to the ISO 9004:2000 standards that embody guidelines and criteria for Self-Assessment similar to the national quality awards.
The author firmly believes that Six Sigma is needed regardless of whether a company is compliant with the ISO 9000 series. The two initiatives are not mutually exclusive and the objectives in applying them are different. A Six Sigma program is applied in organizations based on its top-line and bottom-line rationales. The primary objective for applying the ISO 9000 series standards is to demonstrate the company’s capability to consistently provide conforming products and/or services. Therefore, the ISO 9000 series standard falls well short of making Six Sigma superfluous.
The ISO 9000 series standards have from their early days been regarded and practiced by industry as a minimum set of requirements for doing business. The new ISO 9000:2000 stan
dards do not represent a significant change to this perspective. Six Sigma on the other hand, aims at world-class performance, based on a pragmatic framework for continuous improvement.
The author believes that Six Sigma is superior in such important areas as rate of improvement, bottom-line and top-line results, customer satisfaction, and top-level management commitment. However, considering the stronghold of ISO 9000 in industry, Six Sigma and ISO 9000 are likely to be applied by the same organization, but for very different purposes.
Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma
(1) What is lean manufacturing?
Currently there are two premier approaches to improving manufacturing operations. One is lean manufacturing (hereinafter referred to as “lean”) and the other is Six Sigma.
Lean evaluates the entire operation of a factory and restructures the manufacturing method to reduce wasteful activities like waiting, transportation, material hand-offs,inventory, and over-production. It reduces variation associated with manufacturing routings, material handling, storage, lack of communication, batch production and so forth. Six Sigma tools, on the other hand, commonly focus on specific part numbers and processes to reduce variation. The combination of the two approaches represents a formidable opponent to variation in that it includes both layout of the factory and a focus on specific part numbers and processes.
Lean and Six Sigma are promoted as different approaches and different thought processes. Yet, upon close inspection, both approaches attack the same enemy and behave like two links within a chain – that is, they are dependent on each other for success. They both battle variation, but from two different points of view. The integration of Lean and Six Sigma takes two powerful problem-solving techniques and bundles them into a powerful package. The two approaches should be viewed as complements to each other rather than as equiva
lents of or replacements for each other (Pyzdek, 2000). In practice, manufacturers that have widely adopted lean practices record performance metrics superior to those achieved by plants that have not adopted lean practices. Those practices cited as lean in a recent industrial survey (Jusko, 1999) include
• quick changeover techniques to reduce setup time;
• adoption of manufacturing cells in which equipment and workstations are arranged sequentially to facilitate small-lot, continuous-flow production;
• just-in-time (JIT) continuous-flow production techniques to reduce lot sizes, setup time, and cycle time; and,
• JIT supplier delivery in which parts and materials are delivered to the shop floor on a frequent and as-needed basis.
(2) Differences between Lean and Six Sigma
There are some differences between Lean and Six Sigma as noted below.
• Lean focuses on improving manufacturing operations in variation, quality and productivity. However, Six Sigma focuses not only on manufacturing operations, but also on all possible processes including R&D and service areas.
• Generally speaking, a Lean approach attacks variation differently than a Six Sigma system does (Denecke, 1998) as shown in Figure 5.4. Lean tackles the most common form of process noise by aligning the organization in such a way that it can begin working as a coherent whole instead of as separate units. Lean seeks to co-locate, in sequential order, all the processes required to produce a product. Instead of focusing on the part number, Lean focuses on product flow and on the operator. Setup time, machine maintenance and routing of processes are important measures in Lean. However, Six Sigma focuses on defective rates and costs of poor quality due to part variation and process variation based on measured data.
• The data-driven nature of Six Sigma problem-solving lends itself well to lean standardization and the physical rearrangement of the factory. Lean provides a solid foundation for Six Sigma problem-solving where the system is measured by deviation from and improvements to the standard.
• While Lean emphasizes standardization and productivity, Six Sigma can be more effective at tackling process noise and cost of poor quality.
Currently there are two premier approaches to improving manufacturing operations. One is lean manufacturing (hereinafter referred to as “lean”) and the other is Six Sigma.
Lean evaluates the entire operation of a factory and restructures the manufacturing method to reduce wasteful activities like waiting, transportation, material hand-offs,inventory, and over-production. It reduces variation associated with manufacturing routings, material handling, storage, lack of communication, batch production and so forth. Six Sigma tools, on the other hand, commonly focus on specific part numbers and processes to reduce variation. The combination of the two approaches represents a formidable opponent to variation in that it includes both layout of the factory and a focus on specific part numbers and processes.
Lean and Six Sigma are promoted as different approaches and different thought processes. Yet, upon close inspection, both approaches attack the same enemy and behave like two links within a chain – that is, they are dependent on each other for success. They both battle variation, but from two different points of view. The integration of Lean and Six Sigma takes two powerful problem-solving techniques and bundles them into a powerful package. The two approaches should be viewed as complements to each other rather than as equiva
lents of or replacements for each other (Pyzdek, 2000). In practice, manufacturers that have widely adopted lean practices record performance metrics superior to those achieved by plants that have not adopted lean practices. Those practices cited as lean in a recent industrial survey (Jusko, 1999) include
• quick changeover techniques to reduce setup time;
• adoption of manufacturing cells in which equipment and workstations are arranged sequentially to facilitate small-lot, continuous-flow production;
• just-in-time (JIT) continuous-flow production techniques to reduce lot sizes, setup time, and cycle time; and,
• JIT supplier delivery in which parts and materials are delivered to the shop floor on a frequent and as-needed basis.
(2) Differences between Lean and Six Sigma
There are some differences between Lean and Six Sigma as noted below.
• Lean focuses on improving manufacturing operations in variation, quality and productivity. However, Six Sigma focuses not only on manufacturing operations, but also on all possible processes including R&D and service areas.
• Generally speaking, a Lean approach attacks variation differently than a Six Sigma system does (Denecke, 1998) as shown in Figure 5.4. Lean tackles the most common form of process noise by aligning the organization in such a way that it can begin working as a coherent whole instead of as separate units. Lean seeks to co-locate, in sequential order, all the processes required to produce a product. Instead of focusing on the part number, Lean focuses on product flow and on the operator. Setup time, machine maintenance and routing of processes are important measures in Lean. However, Six Sigma focuses on defective rates and costs of poor quality due to part variation and process variation based on measured data.
• The data-driven nature of Six Sigma problem-solving lends itself well to lean standardization and the physical rearrangement of the factory. Lean provides a solid foundation for Six Sigma problem-solving where the system is measured by deviation from and improvements to the standard.
• While Lean emphasizes standardization and productivity, Six Sigma can be more effective at tackling process noise and cost of poor quality.
Seven Steps for Six Sigma Introduction
When a company intends to introduce Six Sigma for its new management strategy, we would like to recommend the following seven-step procedures:
1. Top-level management commitment for Six Sigma is first and foremost. The CEO of the corporation or business unit should genuinely accept Six Sigma as the management strategy. Then organize a Six Sigma team and set up the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company.
2. Start Six Sigma education for Champions first. Then start the education for WBs, GBs, BBs and MBBs in sequence. Every employee of the company should take the WB education first and then some of the WBs receive the GB education, and finally some of the GBs receive the BB education. However, usually MBB education is practiced in professional organizations.
3. Choose the area in which Six Sigma will be first introduced.
4. Deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. The most important is the company’s deployment of big CTQy from the standpoint of customer satisfaction. Appoint BBs as full-time project leaders and ask them to solve some important CTQ problems.
5. Strengthen the infrastructure for Six Sigma, including measurement systems, statistical process control (SPC), knowledge management (KM), database management system (DBMS) and so on.
6. Designate a Six Sigma day each month, and have the progress of Six Sigma reviewed by top-level management.
7. Evaluate the company’s Six Sigma performance from the customers’ viewpoint, benchmark the best company in the world, and revise the Six Sigma roadmap if necessary. Go to step 1 for further improvement.
First of all, a handful or a group of several members should be appointed as a Six Sigma team to handle all kinds of Six Sigma tasks. The team is supposed to prepare proper education and the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company. We can say that this is the century of the 3Cs, which are Changing society, Customer satisfaction and Competition in quality. The Six Sigma vision should be well matched to these 3Cs. Most importantly, all employees in the company should agree to and respect this long-term vision.
Second, Six Sigma can begin from proper education for all classes of the company. The education should begin from the top managers, so called Champions. If Champions do not understand the real meaning of Six Sigma, there is no way for Six Sigma to proceed further in the company. After Champion’s education, GB BB MBB education should be completed in sequence.
Third, we can divide Six Sigma into three parts according to its characteristics. They are R&D Six Sigma, manufacturing Six Sigma, and Six Sigma for non-manufacturing areas. The R&D Six Sigma is often called DFSS (Design for Six Sigma). It is usually not wise to introduce Six Sigma to all areas at the same time. The CEO should decide the order of introduction to these three areas. It is common to introduce Six Sigma to manufacturing processes first, and then service areas and R&D areas. However, the order really depends on the current circumstances of the company.
Fourth, deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. These CTQs can be deployed by policy management or by management by objectives. Some important CTQs should be given to BBs to solve as project themes. In principle, the BBs who lead the project teams work as full-time workers until the projects are finished.
1. Top-level management commitment for Six Sigma is first and foremost. The CEO of the corporation or business unit should genuinely accept Six Sigma as the management strategy. Then organize a Six Sigma team and set up the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company.
2. Start Six Sigma education for Champions first. Then start the education for WBs, GBs, BBs and MBBs in sequence. Every employee of the company should take the WB education first and then some of the WBs receive the GB education, and finally some of the GBs receive the BB education. However, usually MBB education is practiced in professional organizations.
3. Choose the area in which Six Sigma will be first introduced.
4. Deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. The most important is the company’s deployment of big CTQy from the standpoint of customer satisfaction. Appoint BBs as full-time project leaders and ask them to solve some important CTQ problems.
5. Strengthen the infrastructure for Six Sigma, including measurement systems, statistical process control (SPC), knowledge management (KM), database management system (DBMS) and so on.
6. Designate a Six Sigma day each month, and have the progress of Six Sigma reviewed by top-level management.
7. Evaluate the company’s Six Sigma performance from the customers’ viewpoint, benchmark the best company in the world, and revise the Six Sigma roadmap if necessary. Go to step 1 for further improvement.
First of all, a handful or a group of several members should be appointed as a Six Sigma team to handle all kinds of Six Sigma tasks. The team is supposed to prepare proper education and the long-term Six Sigma vision for the company. We can say that this is the century of the 3Cs, which are Changing society, Customer satisfaction and Competition in quality. The Six Sigma vision should be well matched to these 3Cs. Most importantly, all employees in the company should agree to and respect this long-term vision.
Second, Six Sigma can begin from proper education for all classes of the company. The education should begin from the top managers, so called Champions. If Champions do not understand the real meaning of Six Sigma, there is no way for Six Sigma to proceed further in the company. After Champion’s education, GB BB MBB education should be completed in sequence.
Third, we can divide Six Sigma into three parts according to its characteristics. They are R&D Six Sigma, manufacturing Six Sigma, and Six Sigma for non-manufacturing areas. The R&D Six Sigma is often called DFSS (Design for Six Sigma). It is usually not wise to introduce Six Sigma to all areas at the same time. The CEO should decide the order of introduction to these three areas. It is common to introduce Six Sigma to manufacturing processes first, and then service areas and R&D areas. However, the order really depends on the current circumstances of the company.
Fourth, deploy CTQs for all processes concerned. These CTQs can be deployed by policy management or by management by objectives. Some important CTQs should be given to BBs to solve as project themes. In principle, the BBs who lead the project teams work as full-time workers until the projects are finished.
Conducting An Initial Environmental Review For EMS
Conducting An Initial Environmental Review in ISO 14001 EMSAn initial environmental review covers all the aspects of an EMS. As a result of this review the organization knows its strengths and weaknesses, risks and opportunities regarding the current status of its EMS. The gap between the requirements of the EMS standard and the actual status of the organization shows which aspects the organization should focus its efforts on to improve the system. This leads directly to the development of an environmental management program that should fill the gaps.The Environmental review should focus on three key areas:- Examination of existing environmental management practices and procedures- Identification of significant environmental impacts and their priority- Identification of legal and regulatory requirements1. Examination of Existing Environmental Management Practices andProceduresThe methodology for assessing existing environmental management practices and procedures is proposed here using a questionnaire. The review team fills out this questionnaire by interviewing appropriate people, by analyzing existing documents and procedures dealing with environmental issues and by collecting information about environmental aspects of the organization’s operations, products and services.By conducting the initial environmental review, an organization-specific profile of strengths and weaknesses can be drawn up. Because the score in each EMS area shows the effort needed in terms of financial and human resources,the organization knows where to focus its efforts when building up an EMS and where the largest effort is needed.
2. Identification of Significant Environmental Aspects and their PriorityAn environmental policy requires top management to set priorities regarding environmental aspects. An initial review clearly shows where to set priorities regarding the EMS itself. But, it does not help to set priorities among different environmental problems. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Eenvironmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities, but no clear direction. One way to solve this problem is to develop a so called ?Environmental exposure portfolio?EThe first step of this portfolio analysis is to assess the exposure and therefore the importance of different environmental aspects for an organization’s overall performance.The appropriate perspective and priorities of the environmental policy will differ depending on this preliminary analysis. The analysis should be conducted from the perspective of the stakeholders of the organization, their needs and their importance for the success of the organization. The degree of exposure to different environmental aspects should guide the involvement and perspective of an organization when implementing an EMS. Evaluating exposure to environmental aspects is important, because this exposure is likely to influence the organization’s success sooner or later, either through new legislation, public or consumer perception and behavior or otherwise.The analysis of the expected exposure of an organization to different environmental problems and the weight given to these aspects by various stakeholders enables management to focus on environmental issues that are a high priority to the organization. This is represented in the quadrant in the upper right corner of the environmental exposure portfolio. However, the two quadrants on the left must also be observed, although less vigorously. Issues with low public priority, to which the firm contributes heavily become a problem as soon as the perception of the stakeholders and the public environmental policy changes (the quadrant in the upper left corner of the portfolio). That this can happen very rapidly is obvious, for example from Shell`s ?Brent Spar?Edumping case (detailed information about this case is available from Shell or Greenpeace at their respective WWW-sites). Investments in new production technology, products and services can increase the environmental impact of the organization when not anticipated early enough. In this case, a problem ranked in the lower right corner of the portfolio would shift to the field with the highest priority. Problems ranked in the lower left corner are of no priority. No measures should be taken here.
3. Identification of Legal and Regulatory RequirementsThe identification of legal and regulatory requirements assesses two levels of an organization:- production-related environmental regulations- product- and service-related environmental regulationsThe former addresses the production department while the latter addresses the marketingand R&D departments. Basically, three questions must be answered:- Which are the relevant environmental regulations? (= target)- Is the current situation in the organization known? (= actual)- Does the organization comply with relevant regulations? (=gap)The methodology used here is a questionnaire. To obtain information about environmental regulations the following information sources can be used:- governmental authorities- industry associations- daily newspaper- university publications (law departments)
2. Identification of Significant Environmental Aspects and their PriorityAn environmental policy requires top management to set priorities regarding environmental aspects. An initial review clearly shows where to set priorities regarding the EMS itself. But, it does not help to set priorities among different environmental problems. Many top managers feel pressure to do something for the environment and thus embark on some form of ?Eenvironmental activism?E often containing many isolated activities, but no clear direction. One way to solve this problem is to develop a so called ?Environmental exposure portfolio?EThe first step of this portfolio analysis is to assess the exposure and therefore the importance of different environmental aspects for an organization’s overall performance.The appropriate perspective and priorities of the environmental policy will differ depending on this preliminary analysis. The analysis should be conducted from the perspective of the stakeholders of the organization, their needs and their importance for the success of the organization. The degree of exposure to different environmental aspects should guide the involvement and perspective of an organization when implementing an EMS. Evaluating exposure to environmental aspects is important, because this exposure is likely to influence the organization’s success sooner or later, either through new legislation, public or consumer perception and behavior or otherwise.The analysis of the expected exposure of an organization to different environmental problems and the weight given to these aspects by various stakeholders enables management to focus on environmental issues that are a high priority to the organization. This is represented in the quadrant in the upper right corner of the environmental exposure portfolio. However, the two quadrants on the left must also be observed, although less vigorously. Issues with low public priority, to which the firm contributes heavily become a problem as soon as the perception of the stakeholders and the public environmental policy changes (the quadrant in the upper left corner of the portfolio). That this can happen very rapidly is obvious, for example from Shell`s ?Brent Spar?Edumping case (detailed information about this case is available from Shell or Greenpeace at their respective WWW-sites). Investments in new production technology, products and services can increase the environmental impact of the organization when not anticipated early enough. In this case, a problem ranked in the lower right corner of the portfolio would shift to the field with the highest priority. Problems ranked in the lower left corner are of no priority. No measures should be taken here.
3. Identification of Legal and Regulatory RequirementsThe identification of legal and regulatory requirements assesses two levels of an organization:- production-related environmental regulations- product- and service-related environmental regulationsThe former addresses the production department while the latter addresses the marketingand R&D departments. Basically, three questions must be answered:- Which are the relevant environmental regulations? (= target)- Is the current situation in the organization known? (= actual)- Does the organization comply with relevant regulations? (=gap)The methodology used here is a questionnaire. To obtain information about environmental regulations the following information sources can be used:- governmental authorities- industry associations- daily newspaper- university publications (law departments)
Emergency Preparedness and Response In ISO 14001
Emergency Preparedness and Response In ISO 14001
Under the Emergency Preparedness and Response requirement of ISO 14001:2004 (§4.4.7), the organization is required to establish procedures for identifying the potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents that can have an impact on the environment.
Identification of Potential Emergency and Accident Situations – Experience indicates that organizations infrequently have a preexisting procedure for identifying potential emergency and accident situations.The norm is to establish emergency and accident responses for a variety of emergency and accident situations irrespective of the potential for their occurrence. But ISO 14001 is specific about requiring a procedure to identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents. Adhering to the requirement of the procedure is a valuable exercise that helps organizations identify weaknesses in their own emergency planning and to plan for that which is most likely to occur.Because many environmental impacts of an emergency or accident situation are secondary in nature, it appears that all potential emergency or accident situations need to be identified before a determination of environmental impacts can be made. An organization that attempts to identify potential emergency or accident situations based on a review of its environmental aspects would likely miss the environmental impact potential of, say, an automobile accident.
There are five steps implied by the emergency preparedness and response requirement:
1) Identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents of all kinds;2) Paying particular attention to the potential environmental impacts of accidents and emergency situations, identify how the organization can prevent and mitigate associated adverse environmental impacts;3) Determine how the organization and its employees should respond to emergency situations and accidents;4) Periodically simulate emergency situations to test response capabilities; and,5) Review and revise procedures based on experience derived from actual and simulated emergency situations and accidents.
Accident and Emergency Situation Identification – In order to identify potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents, the organization should develop a procedure for systematically identifying accident and emergency situations, evaluating their probability of occurrence, their likely consequences, and their severity.Organizations often engage risk management specialists to assist in the identification of potential emergency or accident situations that could lead to human injury, environmental damage, or economic loss. While many checklists are available to facilitate this kind of evaluation, there is virtually no substitute for physical evaluation of facilities by knowledgeable personnel, whether employees or outside professionals.
Emergency Response Procedures – The organization is required to develop procedures for responding to emergency situations and accidents when they occur. Typically, response procedures include identifying public emergency response agencies and their capabilities, identifying individuals within the organization who are trained and able to provide assistance in emergencies, establishing an emergency communications network, and providing emergency lighting, signage, and equipment. Because Emergency Response Procedures are based on identified potential emergency situations and accidents specific to the organization, the emergency response plan will be unique for each organization.
Periodic Testing – The value of conducting emergency response exercises lies not only with simulating situations that could occur but also in identifying flaws in the response plan. Practice drills can be the most effective test of the system to give employees, emergency response personnel, and management the opportunity to walk through the plan and gain familiarity with its procedures. While a full-dress response exercise is valuable, testing of procedures can be effectively done on much smaller scales and still provide the benefits of testing. Above all, the organization should not let the impracticality of a full-dress exercise keep it from testing sub elements of the emergency response plan.
Review and Revise – ISO 14001 calls for continual improvement of the EMS. Periodically reviewing and revising emergency response plans based on the experience gained from the occurrence of emergency situations or accidents or in testing response plans is an example of continual improvement.
Written Response Plans – Many written emergency response plans are too cumbersome to be of value in an emergency situation – their value depends entirely upon previous training of persons who will be called upon to execute them. Yet, many organizations fail to provide the emergency response training necessary to make the plans functional.Keeping in mind that even the simplest, most direct emergency response plan requires training for effective implementation, an alternative for organizations to consider is establishment of abbreviated, readily available Immediate Response Directions established for each kind of potential emergency situation or accident. Such an emergency response plan might consist of a laminated card prepared for each potential emergency situation or accident and providing specific responsibilities and associated actions for employees and visitors, supervisors, emergency coordinators, and emergency directors.
Under the Emergency Preparedness and Response requirement of ISO 14001:2004 (§4.4.7), the organization is required to establish procedures for identifying the potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents that can have an impact on the environment.
Identification of Potential Emergency and Accident Situations – Experience indicates that organizations infrequently have a preexisting procedure for identifying potential emergency and accident situations.The norm is to establish emergency and accident responses for a variety of emergency and accident situations irrespective of the potential for their occurrence. But ISO 14001 is specific about requiring a procedure to identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents. Adhering to the requirement of the procedure is a valuable exercise that helps organizations identify weaknesses in their own emergency planning and to plan for that which is most likely to occur.Because many environmental impacts of an emergency or accident situation are secondary in nature, it appears that all potential emergency or accident situations need to be identified before a determination of environmental impacts can be made. An organization that attempts to identify potential emergency or accident situations based on a review of its environmental aspects would likely miss the environmental impact potential of, say, an automobile accident.
There are five steps implied by the emergency preparedness and response requirement:
1) Identify the potential for emergency situations and accidents of all kinds;2) Paying particular attention to the potential environmental impacts of accidents and emergency situations, identify how the organization can prevent and mitigate associated adverse environmental impacts;3) Determine how the organization and its employees should respond to emergency situations and accidents;4) Periodically simulate emergency situations to test response capabilities; and,5) Review and revise procedures based on experience derived from actual and simulated emergency situations and accidents.
Accident and Emergency Situation Identification – In order to identify potential for and responding to emergency situations and accidents, the organization should develop a procedure for systematically identifying accident and emergency situations, evaluating their probability of occurrence, their likely consequences, and their severity.Organizations often engage risk management specialists to assist in the identification of potential emergency or accident situations that could lead to human injury, environmental damage, or economic loss. While many checklists are available to facilitate this kind of evaluation, there is virtually no substitute for physical evaluation of facilities by knowledgeable personnel, whether employees or outside professionals.
Emergency Response Procedures – The organization is required to develop procedures for responding to emergency situations and accidents when they occur. Typically, response procedures include identifying public emergency response agencies and their capabilities, identifying individuals within the organization who are trained and able to provide assistance in emergencies, establishing an emergency communications network, and providing emergency lighting, signage, and equipment. Because Emergency Response Procedures are based on identified potential emergency situations and accidents specific to the organization, the emergency response plan will be unique for each organization.
Periodic Testing – The value of conducting emergency response exercises lies not only with simulating situations that could occur but also in identifying flaws in the response plan. Practice drills can be the most effective test of the system to give employees, emergency response personnel, and management the opportunity to walk through the plan and gain familiarity with its procedures. While a full-dress response exercise is valuable, testing of procedures can be effectively done on much smaller scales and still provide the benefits of testing. Above all, the organization should not let the impracticality of a full-dress exercise keep it from testing sub elements of the emergency response plan.
Review and Revise – ISO 14001 calls for continual improvement of the EMS. Periodically reviewing and revising emergency response plans based on the experience gained from the occurrence of emergency situations or accidents or in testing response plans is an example of continual improvement.
Written Response Plans – Many written emergency response plans are too cumbersome to be of value in an emergency situation – their value depends entirely upon previous training of persons who will be called upon to execute them. Yet, many organizations fail to provide the emergency response training necessary to make the plans functional.Keeping in mind that even the simplest, most direct emergency response plan requires training for effective implementation, an alternative for organizations to consider is establishment of abbreviated, readily available Immediate Response Directions established for each kind of potential emergency situation or accident. Such an emergency response plan might consist of a laminated card prepared for each potential emergency situation or accident and providing specific responsibilities and associated actions for employees and visitors, supervisors, emergency coordinators, and emergency directors.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)